Cited by 662Grit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationBehavioral Health and InterventionsEducation, Achievement, and Giftedness

Self-Control and Academic Achievement

Duckworth, Angela L., Taxer, Jamie L., Eskreis-Winkler, Lauren, Galla, Brian M., Gross, James J.·2019·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Self-control refers to the alignment of thoughts, feelings, and actions with enduringly valued goals in the face of momentarily more alluring alternatives. In this review, we examine the role of self-control in academic achievement. We begin by defining self-control and distinguishing it from related constructs. Next, we summarize evidence that nearly all students experience conflict between academic goals that they value in the long run and nonacademic goals that they find more gratifying in the moment. We then turn to longitudinal evidence relating self-control to academic attainment, course grades, and performance on standardized achievement tests. We use the process model of self-control to illustrate how impulses are generated and regulated, emphasizing opportunities for students to deliberately strengthen impulses that are congruent with, and dampen impulses that are incongruent with, academic goals. Finally, we conclude with future directions for both science and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103230

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Children who are better at self-regulation in early childhood are more likely to excel academically and socially, leading healthier lives with fewer behavioural problems.

    “Children who are better at self‐regulation in early childhood are more likely to excel academically and socially, leading healthier lives with fewer behavioural problems (Duckworth et al., 2019; Moffitt et al., 2011; Perry et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duckworth, A. L., Taxer, J. L., Eskreis-Winkler, L., Galla, B. M., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2019-01-04
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
373-399
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2907927286
Cited by
662
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 127 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 27
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institute on Aging (R24AG048081)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Keywords
self-control, academic performance, goal conflict, impulse control, standardized achievement tests, course grades, student motivation
MeSH terms
Self-Control, Academic Success, Humans, Students, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review