The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 178 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism
Open accessAbstract
Research on cognitive control and executive function has long recognized the relevance of motivational factors. Recently, however, the topic has come increasingly to center stage, with a surge of new studies examining the interface of motivation and cognitive control. In the present article we survey research situated at this interface, considering work from cognitive and social psychology and behavioral economics, but with a particular focus on neuroscience research. We organize existing findings into three core areas, considering them in the light of currently vying theoretical perspectives. Based on the accumulated evidence, we advocate for a view of control function that treats it as a domain of reward-based decision making. More broadly, we argue that neuroscientific evidence plays a critical role in understanding the mechanisms by which motivation and cognitive control interact. Opportunities for further cross-fertilization between behavioral and neuroscientific research are highlighted.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review synthesizes behavioral and neuroscience research on how motivation shapes cognitive control, arguing that control is best understood as a form of reward-based decision making. It contends that neuroscience is essential for grounding the constructs of reward and effort and for explaining incentive effects, control dynamics, and effort costs.
Key findings
- Incentives generally improve executive control across selective attention, memory, response inhibition, task switching, and working memory; for example, Padmala & Pessoa’s reward cue ($20 vs. $00) reduced Stroop-like interference and facilitation effects. However, boundary conditions exist: very small payments can undermine performance, very large incentives can produce “choking under pressure,” and extrinsic rewards may reduce intrinsic motivation.
- Cognitive control carries an intrinsic cost: participants prefer lower-demand tasks and require substantially higher pay to choose high-demand tasks; neural signals in ventral striatum, ACC, and dorsolateral PFC track effort discounting and demand avoidance.
- Depletion effects are increasingly interpreted motivationally rather than as glucose or resource depletion; incentives can restore performance and error-related neural signals, and neural data show changes in reward and control networks rather than global metabolic decline.
- The review favors reward-based models over force-field and limited-resource accounts, proposing interactions between reward-related regions (ventromedial/orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, amygdala, midbrain dopamine) and control-related regions (lateral PFC, ACC, parietal cortex, insula), with ACC and dopamine as key interfaces.
Methods
- Narrative, selective review rather than a primary empirical study; it synthesizes cognitive psychology, social/personality psychology, behavioral economics, and neuroscience literatures.
- Organizes evidence under three headings: the incentive–performance relationship, temporal dynamics of control, and the cost of control; compares force-field, limited-resource, and reward-based decision-making theories.
- Draws on cited behavioral, fMRI, EEG, primate neurophysiology, and pharmacological studies; no new data, systematic search, or meta-analysis are reported.
Limitations
- The authors state that neuroscientific work on motivation and control is still early-stage, many mechanistic details remain unresolved, and depletion-related neural findings are sparse and inconsistent; reward and effort constructs also face circularity and measurement problems.
- Evident from the text: the review is selective and narrative, with no formal meta-analysis or systematic inclusion criteria; conclusions rely on cited studies rather than new experiments, and some figures/references appear incomplete in the provided text.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
120 Not checked yet · 54 Own interpretation · 13 No basis given
In the paper
“Lynn et al. (2012) found that experimental participants performing Stroop and working-memory tasks reported an increase in the urge to quit immediately following difficult, conflict-inducing trials.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lynn et al. 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the intensity and direction of control tend to vary over time, both in response to the details of the task and independent of them”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Eichele et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Esterman et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Weissman et al. 2006
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conflict adjustment effects have also been observed to increase in size following performance-contingent monetary rewards”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braem et al. 2012
- Not checked yetcites St ürmer et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Braem et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The attention-distraction group showed a subsequent reduction in measured working memory capacity, relative to the control group.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmeichel 2007
plaindirectn = 2- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the investment of cognitive effort can be driven by internal sources of motivation”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cacioppo et al. 1996
- Not checked yetcites Deci & Ryan 2000
- Not checked yetcites Nicholls 1984
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Enhanced performance was found on reward trials relative to nonreward trials, in terms of both error rates and response times.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padmala & Pessoa 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The introduction or enlargement of performance-contingent rewards or punishments results in improvements in task performance, specifically attributable to enhanced executive control.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padmala & Pessoa 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we advocate for a view of control function that treats it as a domain of reward-based decision making.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.
In the paper
“recent work has adopted an alternative perspective on the depletion effect, characterizing it as a motivational phenomenon.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht et al. 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similar incentive-induced performance improvements in control have been observed in a range of other tasks, tapping other facets of executive function.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Libby & Lipe 1992
- Not checked yetcites Leotti & Wager 2010
- Not checked yetcites Aarts et al. 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“depletion can be reduced or eliminated by performance incentives”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. 2006
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Muraven & Slessareva 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“they nonetheless combine with the observations described previously to show that the relationship is generally extremely strong.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“resource-based accounts rest upon the additional-and frankly unnecessary-assumption that the dynamics of motivation reflect levels of a limited-capacity resource.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“force-field theories such as CET can be interpreted in terms that align them with certain reward-based accounts.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when this principle is applied to force-field accounts of motivation, the resulting optimization process does not have a transparent psychological interpretation.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This dual mediating role exacerbates the measurement problem, since it is difficult to independently estimate (or manipulate) the performance-related and cost-related facets of effort.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kool & Botvinick (2014) confirmed that these predictions hold in the case of cognitive effort, just as they have been shown to hold in labor markets.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Reward-Based Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kool & Botvinick 2014
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“neuroscience may offer a solution to the problem of circularity associated with the construct of reward.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Absent a more compelling candidate, the resource in strength theory and related accounts remains an abstract one, manifesting only through its supposed impact on behavior.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Effort is a key ingredient in many (if not all) theories relating motivation to cognitive control”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bettman et al. 1990
- Not checked yetcites Bonner & Sprinkle 2002
- Not checked yetcites Camerer & Hogarth 1999
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“resource accounts have imported a motivational factor, according to which depletion makes the subject not less able to mobilize control, but simply less willing to do so”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagger et al. 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“autonomic effects on cardiac, pupillary, and metabolic function have been used to considerable effect as independent measures of effort”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fairclough & Houston 2004
- Not checked yetcites Silvestrini & Gendolla 2013
- Not checked yetcites Silvia et al. 2014
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neuroscience appears capable of playing a similar role when it comes to the effort construct.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kool et al. (2010) observed a consistent preference for the lower-demand source”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kool et al. 2010
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These and related considerations have led to a recent trend away from resource-based accounts of the depletion effect and toward motivational or reward-based accounts”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagger et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht & Schmeichel 2012
- Not checked yetcites Kurzban et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“when compared with resource accounts, reward-based models have the advantage of being more parsimonious.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Because the theory is not framed in terms of an optimization process, it is difficult for it to explain why one strategy might be preferred over another without moving outside the scope of the force-field mechanism.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A similar though less often noted problem attaches to a second construct that is central to many reward-based theories of motivation and control, namely the construct of effort.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If neural correlates of effort can be identified, this provides a way out of the potential circularity of effort-based explanation.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In reward-based accounts, the reluctance stems directly from the utility function, which changes shape based on the recent history of effort expenditure”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kool & Botvinick 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reward-based accounts of the relations between motivation and cognitive control also have some apparent advantages over force-field models.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“as current data in fact do suggest (Levy & Glimcher 2012)”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Levy & Glimcher 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“reward-based accounts center on an optimization process, in which different control operations are compared in terms of their associated net rewards”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is an obvious risk of circularity here: Choice is explained based on reward, but reward is inferred from choice.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is possible to map directly among the three approaches.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reward-based theories of the motivation-control interface appear to have an edge over other approaches.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“accumulating evidence has seriously undermined its plausibility”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Kurzban et al. 2013
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The problem becomes deeper when effort is also assumed to carry an inherent cost”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“findings from psychophysiology point the way to more central neuroscientific measures through which contact might be made with genuine mediating mechanisms.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Detailed behavioral analyses confirmed that this preference was not wholly driven by error avoidance or by minimization of time on task.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kool et al. 2010
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“reward-based theories carry their own special liability.This attaches to the construct of reward itself.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it is not clear from a psychological point of view exactly what force-field models are optimizing.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the depletion effect can be prevented by offering strong performance incentives (Muraven & Slessareva 2003).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Muraven & Slessareva 2003
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“it remains an ineluctable problem for any psychological theory that would leverage the notion of reward”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padoa-Schioppa 2011
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“high-reward conditions selectively amplify delayperiod activity within the lateral PFC, parietal cortex, and other components of the brain cognitive control network.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gilbert & Fiez 2004
- Not checked yetcites Krawczyk et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Pochon et al. 2002
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“evidence suggests that the ACC may serve as a key interface between reward and control networks”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kouneiher et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Vassena et al. 2014
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These and related results provided the first neuroscientific evidence that motivational signals can modulate core components of cognitive control.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“DA neurons show phasic responses to reward cues”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schultz 1998
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Dixon & Christoff (2012) used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) adaptation methods to show that activity in lateral PFC is sensitive to the conjunction of task rule and trial reward value, such that activity was modulated only when there was repetition of both dimensions.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dixon & Christoff 2012
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Studies of reward-based decision making have, in parallel, identified a distinct network of relevant structures including ventromedial and orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum (including the nucleus accumbens), and amygdala, as well as the ventral tegmental area”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bartra et al. 2013
- Not checked yetcites Clithero & Rangel 2014
- Not checked yetcites Liu et al. 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Convergent evidence suggests that these effects within the control network are driven by input from the set of brain areas we have referred to collectively as the reward network.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“its involvement in this spiral pathway points to a potential role for DA in connecting control with motivation”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aarts et al. 2011
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a wide range of evidence indicates that the ACC is involved in reward-based decision making”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallis & Kennerley 2011
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“information from ventral cortical areas belonging to the reward network may flow to dorsal control areas via a spiral-like pathway running through the striatum via anatomically asymmetric projections to and from the ventral tegmental areas”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Haber et al. 2000
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“neuroscience offers to play a more pivotal role, occupying the critical path toward a causally adequate understanding of the motivation-control interface.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: unclear — It is unclear whether it could be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“tonic DA release has been linked to sustained motivational behaviors”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Howe et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“PFC neurons involved in working memory display tonically elevated baseline activity during trial blocks involving relatively large or preferred rewards, persisting even through isolated trials in which task cues indicate that no reward is available.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Watanabe 1996
- Not checked yetcites Watanabe et al. 2002
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Padmala & Pessoa (2011) proposed a model in which reward cues trigger motivational signals in subcortical reward structures, which then provide a source of increased drive to frontoparietal cognitive control regions, enabling more effective utilization of control processes.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padmala & Pessoa 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the results of such studies largely support the view that motivational signals enhance cognitive control functions by sharpening how task goals and other task-relevant information are represented, maintained, and utilized within lateral PFC and associated regions of the brain's control network.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the ubiquity of reward-related signals in the relevant areas seems to justify viewing them together as a coherent network that is focused in a broad sense upon reward processing.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Neuroscientific studies of cognitive control have identified a set of cortical and subcortical structures that appear to work together to implement control function.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Cole & Schneider 2007
- Not checked yetcites Duncan 2010
- Not checked yetcites Niendam et al. 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Anatomical data are certainly consistent with this possibility.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barbas & Pandya 1989
- Not checked yetcites Cavada et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Alexander et al. 1986
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Compared with a control group that performed a less demanding intervening task, the depleted group showed a reduction in task-induced activity in left inferior PFC, ACC, caudate nucleus, and cerebellum following the working memory task”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Persson et al. (2013)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Another fMRI study, by Wagner et al. (2013), suggests that depletion can involve changes in the functional connectivity between prefrontal control areas and other cortical areas with which they communicate.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al. (2013)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.
In the paper
“Here again, a weakening of error monitoring is observed at the neural level.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht & Gutsell (2007)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“These results were interpreted as indicating that the ACC provides a source of excitatory drive that results in increased connectivity selectively between task-relevant processing regions.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rowe et al. 2008
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hajcak et al. (2005), for example, observed a larger ERN on trials where a large reward for correct performance was at stake relative to trials involving a smaller potential reward”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hajcak et al. 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“after performing a cognitively depleting attention control task, a group of dieters showed enhanced orbitofrontal cortex responses to images of food items”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al. (2013)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Among subjects who responded to these incentives primarily by increasing accuracy, a restoration of ERN amplitude was also observed.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the account postulates that motivation signals, reflected in terms of phasic and tonic DA release, should lead to a preferential enhancement of proactive control.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braver 2012
- Not checked yetcites Braver et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a wide range of studies have reported an inverse relationship between activity in the executive network and a different set of regions, including ventromedial PFC and posterior cingulate cortex.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“this study also observed increased activity in the homologous right inferior PFC region”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Persson et al. (2013)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition to driving trial-to-trial shifts in control, performance monitoring can display its own longer-term dynamics.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the magnitude of posterror slowing returned to baseline when monetary performance incentives were introduced.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which suggests that under some circumstances depletion may induce not a simple reduction in frontal function but instead a redistribution of activity.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the most common finding in studies of incentive manipulations is that neural activity is modulated in a preparatory manner-i.e., prior to when responses are required”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braver 2012
- Not checked yetcites Braver et al. 2007
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“alongside an increase in reaction times on trials associated with high control demands.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Persson et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“High reward rates create an opportunity cost for sloth, such that all actions (even those that are unrewarded) are performed with higher vigor (i.e., faster latencies) in order to attain more rewards per unit time.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Niv et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“human studies of motivation and control interactions have consistently observed incentive-linked activity in DA nuclei that predicts performance in control-demanding tasks”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aarts et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Adcock et al. 2006
- Not checked yetcites Krebs et al. 2012
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In a second experiment in the same report, a similar effect on ERN magnitude was observed when participants were told that their performance would be monitored and later compared with that of other participants.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hajcak et al. 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Bengtsson et al. (2009) observed a related effect by using fMRI.Here, participants who were informed that their cognitive ability was being assessed showed increased error-associated activity in dorsal ACC and lateral PFC relative to subjects performing the same task without the assessment cover story”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bengtsson et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, error monitoring can lapse with increasing time on task.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings suggest that reward incentives primarily target proactive (i.e., preparatory) control processes.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“but this effect was accompanied by reduced functional connectivity between orbitofrontal cortex and both right and left inferior frontal cortex.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although Boksem and colleagues (2006) characterized these findings in terms of mental fatigue, similar temporal dynamics are involved in what has been referred to as ego depletion”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Inzlicht & Gutsell (2007) found a reduction in ERN amplitude in a Stroop task when this task was performed following a depleting emotion-suppression task.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht & Gutsell (2007)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Boksem et al. (2006), who observed a steady reduction in posterror slowing over the course of two hours performing a cue-validity task.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Through concurrent EEG recording, the same study revealed a concurrent reduction in the magnitude of the ERN.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“A parallel reduction was seen in the N2”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. (2006)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The exertion of cognitive control is experienced as subjectively costly, as demonstrated in terms of demand-selection and economic discounting phenomena described above.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the social-personality literature has provided a wealth of data concerning the central role of goal representations as mediating between motivation and behavior (Fishbach & Ferguson 2007, Hockey 1997, Locke & Latham 2013).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Fishbach & Ferguson 2007
- Not checked yetcites Hockey 1997
- Not checked yetcites Locke & Latham 2013
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the reward circuits underlying motivational effects in control appear to strongly overlap with those involved in other varieties of reward-based choice”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The goal construct has, to date, been considered in a relatively simplified manner within neuroscience (i.e., in terms of simple task rules).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“At moments when participants chose the higher-demand option, greater activity was observed in the striatum, including nucleus accumbens, than when the lower-demand option was chosen.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schouppe et al. (2014)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“the ACC seems to be an important hub for physical effort-based decision making”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walton et al. 2006
- Not checked yetcites Hosokawa et al. 2013
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It seems clear, from the available evidence, that cognitive effort is closely tied to engagement of the executive control network, spanning dorsolateral PFC, ACC, and intraparietal cortex.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“McGuire & Botvinick (2010; see also Kool et al. 2013) found that the degree to which performance of a cognitively demanding task engaged these regions predicted the extent to which that same task would later be avoided.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites McGuire & Botvinick (2010)
- Not checked yetcites Kool et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“some ACC neurons code for physical effort demands during effort-based decision making (Hosokawa et al. 2013)”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hosokawa et al. 2013
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At an implementation level, the available data strongly suggest that motivational effects in control reflect interactions between two large-scale brain networks, one centrally involved in representing reward value and the other involved in implementing control function.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it suggests a view of control function that centers on an ongoing cost-benefit analysis, in which the potential rewards of control engagement are weighed against its inherent disutility.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Participants performed cognitive tasks to earn monetary rewards, and ventral striatum activity was found to increase at the time of reward delivery.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Botvinick et al. (2009)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neuroscientific data, although currently sparse, encourage this reorientation by showing that depletion is not generally accompanied by overall reductions in brain activity (as a metabolic account would predict)”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and that it involves changes in activity both in reward networks and in centers that have been linked with control costs.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“several neural structures, including dopaminergic projections, ventral striatum, ventromedial PFC, lateral PFC, and ACC appear to serve as critical channels for control-relevant motivational signals.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In the ventral striatum and ACC, DA levels appear to modulate effort-based decision making”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salamone et al. 2012
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“fMRI revealed elevated activity in both dorsal cingulate and dorsolateral PFC on trials in which the participant actively chose to forgo rather than engage for potential reward.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Magno et al. (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, these findings are consistent with a role for both dorsal ACC and dorsolateral PFC in cost-sensitive decision making related to the exertion of cognitive control”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Further research has revealed a role for both ACC and dorsolateral PFC in driving cognitive demand avoidance in decision making.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the available results from neuroscience resonate strongly with the view that cognitive control represents a domain of reward-based decision making within which operations are selected based on decision mechanisms related to those involved in other forms of reward-based choice.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Maddox & Markman (2010) further observed that nonlinear effects on cognitive control can result when incentives differ at local and global levels”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Maddox & Markman (2010)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“reward responses were reduced when a high degree of mental effort had been required by the task”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Botvinick et al. (2009)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Another behavioral finding that presents an interesting opportunity for neuroscientific research is that the impact of incentives on controlled information processing can depend strongly on how those incentives are framed.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“an apparent neural correlate of cognitive effort discounting, in which the subjective value of a reward is decremented by the cost in effort required to attain it”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Botvinick and colleagues (2009) and Kool et al. (2013) observed that ventral striatal reward responses correlated negatively with the degree of activity in both ACC and dorsolateral PFC during performance of the foregoing cognitive task.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Botvinick et al. (2009)
- Not checked yetcites Kool et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a shift toward reduced willingness to engage in physical effort for reward when DA inputs to these structures are blocked (Salamone et al. 2012).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Salamone et al. 2012
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, taken together, existing neuroscientific results appear most consistent with a rewardbased perspective on control function.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Optogenetics, for example, has already allowed a clear demonstration of the causal role of dopaminergic neurons in driving motivated behavior in rodent models (Ilango et al. 2014).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Ilango et al. 2014
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“behavioral research has recently begun to move away from the idea that depletion reflects diminished levels of glucose or some other metabolic resource and has turned instead to the idea that it may arise from motivational factors.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One important construct in behavioral research on goals, which to our knowledge has been neglected in neuroscientific work, is that of goal commitment, the discrete shift from goal selection to goal pursuit (Nenkov & Gollwitzer 2012).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Nenkov & Gollwitzer 2012
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“a decreased willingness to engage in physical work to earn rewards following ACC lesions (Walton et al. 2006)”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Walton et al. 2006
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This helps explain what might otherwise be a mysterious aspect of control function: the fact that people do not always invest the maximum amount of effort in cognitive tasks they have chosen to perform.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Hosokawa et al. (2013) reported neurons in macaque ACC that coded the value of chosen actions, net the cost of physical effort.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hosokawa et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Nevertheless, the striatum would appear to be a plausible candidate to mediate in effort-based choice, given the key role it is widely believed to play in go/no-go decisions in general (Frank & Claus 2006).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Frank & Claus 2006
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The idea that physical effort is associated with subjective disutility has a very long history and a rich bed of empirical support.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- It may state two separate claims as one. 36
- Probably not a substantial claim. 33
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“paradoxical effects can arise when incentive magnitude becomes either very small or very large.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gneezy & Rustichini 2000
- Not checked yetcites Ariely et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites Baumeister 1984
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the proposal that conflict may act as an aversive signal prompting task avoidance”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Botvinick 2007
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“some research has suggested the existence of an undermining effect, according to which the introduction of extrinsic (e.g., monetary) rewards can reduce the intrinsic motivation associated with a task”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Murayama et al. 2010
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Control is motivated.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > -Arnold Palmer
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“self-control exertion at Time 1 leads to the motivated switching of task priorities, wherein mental work becomes increasingly aversive, making mental leisure increasingly attractive”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht et al. 2014
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we argue that neuroscientific evidence plays a critical role in understanding the mechanisms by which motivation and cognitive control interact.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Abstract
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“incentives are liable to trigger performance improvements primarily in task settings where adjustments in the intensity or direction of control tend to be efficacious”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Camerer & Hogarth 1999
- Not checked yetcites Bonner et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Awasthi & Pratt 1990
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“engagement in a control-demanding activity is followed by reduced persistence and/or poorer performance on a second task, compared to when that second task is preceded by a less demanding activity.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hagger et al. 2010
- Not checked yetcites Muraven & Baumeister 2000
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“control is known to vary in response to ongoing performance monitoring.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites St ürmer et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Boksem et al. 2006
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although all of these studies have observed enhancements in control with increasing incentives, it is important to note that this relationship is not inviolable.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Camerer & Hogarth 1999
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Traditionally, these types of depletion effects have been explained in terms of a structural constraint on the capacity for sustained cognitive control”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Dynamics of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Baumeister et al. 1998
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Baumeister and colleagues (Gailliot et al. 2007, Masicampo & Baumeister 2008) have proposed that the resource underlying behavioral depletion effects and related phenomena is in fact blood glucose.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gailliot et al. 2007
- Not checked yetcites Masicampo & Baumeister 2008
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“CET does not explicitly specify the basis for strategy choice.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In forcefield accounts, as represented by CET, cognitive actions are the result of equilibrium being reached between driving and restraining forces.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“resources have been decried as theoretical”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hockey 1997
- Not checked yetcites Inzlicht et al. 2014
- Not checked yetcites Kurzban et al. 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“such theories introduce effort as a variable mediating between incentives and performance.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Reward-based theories are founded on the idea that behavioral choices reflect comparisons of reward or value.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Some initial evidence for the role of glucose was provided in studies that found glucose administration reversed the depletion effect”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Resource Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gailliot et al. 2007
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This approach views the operation of the control as involving an ongoing series of decisions, each aimed at maximizing expected utility.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Reward-Based Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dayan 2012
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In many settings, the answer assumed is that one may infer such values from the individual's overt choices.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“effort actually plays not one but two mediating roles.First, it determines the quality of performance (and thus, indirectly, the performance-dependent income), and second, it scales the cost associated with task engagement.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These measures are necessarily indirect, serving only as potential biomarkers or reporter variables indicating the level of effort; they clearly cannot mediate the relationship between incentives and performance.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Effort is purported to explain the relationship between incentives and performance, but it is also measured or inferred from the observed relationship between these two.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The basic idea is to conceptualize action as the result of forces, akin to physical forces, that attract an individual toward a goal or else impede progress toward that goal.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Force-Field Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Atkinson & Birch 1978
- Not checked yetcites Berridge 2004
- Not checked yetcites Hull 1943
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the optimal amount of effort to invest is the one that maximizes net reward, i.e., the”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“based on behavior alone, values cannot be measured independently of choice.Consequently, the assertion that choices maximize values is intrinsically circular.The observation that values are actually computed in the brain essentially breaks this circularity.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padoa-Schioppa 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The idea that cognitive control may be inherently costly or aversive has cropped up not only in the depletion literature but also in connection with other topics”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Taylor 1981
- Not checked yetcites Bonner & Sprinkle 2002
- Not checked yetcites Smith & Walker 1993
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Shenhav et al. (2013) presented a theory centering on the concept of the expected value of control (EVC).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Reward-Based Models
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If these assertions are correct, if neuroscience offers a way to ground otherwise circular notions of reward and effort, then the role of neuroscience assumes central importance in the study of motivation and cognitive control.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > From Metaphor to Mechanism
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A different set of regions, including the ventromedial frontal and medial parietal cortices, has been widely reported to decline in activity during performance of control-demanding tasks and has thus sometimes been referred to as the default mode or task-negative network”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buckner et al. 2008
- Not checked yetcites Fox et al. 2005
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Jimura et al. (2010) found selective behavioral performance enhancements and individual differences effects of motivational context, which were statistically mediated by a shift in lateral PFC activity dynamics from a transient mode (activated late in the trial, during the response period) to a sustained and anticipatory mode (activated both tonically and early in the trial during working memory”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Jimura et al. 2010
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study by Gläscher and colleagues (2012) identified a region within medial PFC associated with performance in both reward and cognitive control tasks; the investigators proposed that this region might play a mediating role in linking reward and control networks.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gläscher et al. 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“strong direct connectivity exists between ventromedial frontal areas involved in reward processing and lateral PFC areas strongly implicated in control (Barbas & Pandya 1989, Cavada et al. 2000), alongside a pathway connecting the two areas via the caudate nucleus (Alexander et al. 1986).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Barbas & Pandya 1989
- Not checked yetcites Cavada et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Alexander et al. 1986
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“DA is known to have a range of effects on cellular physiology, such as altering neuronal excitability (Henze et al. 2000, Nicola et al. 2000) and enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (Durstewitz & Seamans 2008, Thurley et al. 2008).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Henze et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Nicola et al. 2000
- Not checked yetcites Durstewitz & Seamans 2008
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“When task events signaled an increasing opportunity for reward on one dimension, rising ACC activity was observed along with a greater behavioral bias toward the relevant target dimension.Moreover, the increase in ACC activity was accompanied by a shift in connectivity between the dorsolateral PFC and other PFC regions associated with each dimension”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Rowe et al. 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This suggests that motivational context can exert a sustained influence on PFC activity and that incentives can affect cognitive control in both a trial-by-trial and a contextual (block-based) manner.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the lateral PFC may house a discrete set of hierarchically organized subregions, subserving different levels of control function”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Badre 2008
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This structure has long been known to play a critical role in monitoring action selection and task performance as well as in triggering compensatory adjustments in cognitive control”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. 2013
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“a number of investigators have proposed that the ACC might play a central role in bridging between reward and control processing.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
hedgedconditional- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Etzel and colleagues ( J.A. Etzel, M.W. Cole, J.M. Zacks, K.N.Kay & T.S. Braver, manuscript submitted) used fMRI pattern classification methods to demonstrate that task rules could be decoded more effectively on incentive trials compared to intermixed nonincentive trials.Moreover, the patterns of activity associated with each task were more distinct from each other, which suggests that incentives”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Etzel et al., manuscript submitted
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“neurons in dorsolateral PFC that code for specific locations were found to display sustained activity over the delay, consistent with a role in working memory maintenance.More importantly, on trials in which large rewards were offered for accurate recall, this delay-period activity was selectively enhanced.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Leon & Shadlen 1999
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“several investigators have suggested that a corresponding hierarchy resides within the medial PFC, which serves to regulate the lateral hierarchy based on motivational inputs”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Holroyd & Yeung 2012
- Not checked yetcites Kouneiher et al. 2009
- Not checked yetcites O'Reilly 2010
hedgeddirect- Asserted: fails — The authors may not put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.
In the paper
“DA may sharpen cortical tuning (Gamo & Arnsten 2011), which could have the effect of heightening perceptual sensitivity and enhancing top-down attentional or control signals.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Gamo & Arnsten 2011
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Shenhav and colleagues (2013), who propose that the dorsal ACC computes the expected value of control, as defined previously, using this as a basis for selecting among candidate control functions, which are then implemented in other sectors of the lateral PFC.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“incentive cues occurring before the imperative stimulus were found to trigger activity in core components of the reward network (dopaminergic midbrain, caudate/putamen, and nucleus accumbens) as well as in lateral frontoparietal components of the control network.More strikingly, during the same period these two sets of regions also showed increased functional connectivity”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Padmala & Pessoa 2011
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vast majority of neuroscientific research on the relationship between motivation and control adopts what we have termed the reward-based perspective, viewing control operations as guided by a utility-maximization principle.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > A Tale of Two Systems
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Experimental support for this account has been provided in studies showing that during an oddball targetdiscrimination task, the long-run average reward value (across minute timescales) had a distinct influence on task reaction times (Guitart-Masip et al. 2011) and that this effect is modulated by pharmacological manipulation of DA levels (Beierholm et al. 2013).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Guitart-Masip et al. 2011
- Not checked yetcites Beierholm et al. 2013
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which is widely interpreted as an ERP correlate of conflict detection.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Because the latter network tends to become more active when the subject is at rest, i.e., not engaged in effortful, controlled information processing, it is often referred to as the default mode network (Buckner et al. 2008).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Buckner et al. 2008
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“theoretical work implicating tonic DA release in the vigor (i.e., intensity, speed) of responding (Niv et al. 2007).Under this account, tonic DA encodes the long-run average reward rate of the environment.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Niv et al. 2007
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Esposito and colleagues (2014), who found that inducing mental exhaustion-resulting from sustained performance of a novel task-led to both increased activity (resting-state fluctuations) in the default mode network and decreased activation of the frontoparietal executive network.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Esposito et al. (2014)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- The authors state this as an assumption: Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.
In the paper
“These results were interpreted as indicating an overmotivation effect, with an imbalance between activation in subcortical (reward-related) versus prefrontal (cognitive) regions leading toward a shift from more goal-directed to habitual guidance of behavior”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mobbs et al. 2009
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The authors interpret this finding as reflecting a reduction in top-down control of reward representations in orbitofrontal cortex.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wagner et al. (2013)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Compared to low-incentive trials, high-incentive trials were associated with both poorer performance and increased activity in the DA midbrain and dorsal striatum.Moreover, these effects were linked, in that participants showing the strongest responses in these regions also showed the largest incentive-linked performance decrements.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mobbs et al. 2009
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Braver and colleagues (Braver 2012, Braver et al. 2007) proposed a theory of dual mechanisms of control, under which proactive control processes reflect context-triggered updating and active maintenance of task goals in lateral PFC and are dependent upon phasic and tonic DA modulation of PFC neuronal activity.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Relationship Between Incentives and Performance: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Braver 2012
- Not checked yetcites Braver et al. 2007
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“At the behavioral level, motivation impacts the dynamics of cognitive control on both short timescales, through performance monitoring, and longer timescales, as in the ego-depletion effect.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > Control Dynamics: Neuroscientific Findings
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A second general conclusion from the available neuroscientific data, again consistent with reward-based behavioral models, is that the exertion of control carries an intrinsic subjective cost and that this cost plays an important role in shaping control function.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“which suggests that a promotion focus (a focus on advancement and accomplishment) should produce better performance when incentives are framed in terms of monetary gain than when they are framed in terms of the avoidance of loss, whereas a prevention focus (a focus on safety and security) should produce the converse pattern.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Higgins 2000
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Initial studies have suggested that the circuitry underlying cognitive effort-based decision making overlaps with that relating to physical effort, but it is also partially distinctive (see Schmidt et al. 2012).”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schmidt et al. 2012
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“rising incentives can be understood as making it”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > DISCUSSION
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“which is the difference between (a) the rewards expected from mobilizing control with a particular direction and intensity and (b) the inherent cost associated with this mobilization.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. (2013)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Croxson and colleagues (2009) observed an analogous integration between reward and effort demands in dorsal ACC, alongside signals correlating with net value in both ventral striatum and midbrain.”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Croxson et al. (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Shenhav et al. (2013), focusing specifically on the dorsal ACC, proposed that a core function of this structure is to compute the expected value of control”
§ Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism > The Cost of Control: Neuroscientific Findings
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Shenhav et al. (2013)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The authors state this as an assumption.
Decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.
“An important assumption that enters into most reward-based models is that decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Parsimony is a legitimate criterion for comparing psychological theories.
“claims based upon parsimony cannot withstand contrary empirical evidence.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Circularity in explaining choice via reward is a theoretical problem that must be resolved.
“There is an obvious risk of circularity here: Choice is explained based on reward, but reward is inferred from choice.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Neural correlates of effort can serve as independent measures of effort that are dissociable from performance.
“If neural correlates of effort can be identified, this provides a way out of the potential circularity of effort-based explanation.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.
“Depletion effects, however, are postulated to involve more than a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion: They are understood to involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Consequently, modern theories of motivation increasingly describe motivational states as the output of a computation (calculation), where the expected value of an action is weighed against anticipated costs. These include energetic costs, as all goal pursuit will require the expenditure of metabolic energy, opportunity costs, as the pursuit of one goal might block progress towards another, hedonic”
From Motivation in the Service of Allostasis: The Role of Anterior Mid-Cingulate Cortex (2019) · cites this paper as Botvinick and Braver, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In short, studies have provided evidence for a widespread influence of incentive reward on executive functioning and, more broadly, cognitive control which is also observed on the level of attentional control (Botvinick & Braver, 2015).”
From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Botvinick & Braver, 2015
In the citing paper
“An acute or chronic impairment in explaining-away prediction errors represents a form of “cognitive stress” and will be registered by higher model levels on the cognitive hierarchy involved in monitoring the cognitive performance of the lower levels of the internal model (85).”
From Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice? (2016) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“As alluded to above, a persistent impairment of minimizing prediction errors in a specific processing stream is likely registered by higher systems for self-monitoring (85) and creates the continuing experience of an unpredictable environment of bewildering complexity.”
From Can Bayesian Theories of Autism Spectrum Disorder Help Improve Clinical Practice? (2016) · cites this paper as [85]
In the citing paper
“This article will be included because it offers the unique perspective of CC's interconnection with motivation which may offer insight into possible connections with embodied cognition, especially with respects to the reward-based models.”
From The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015)
In the citing paper
“This article also provides explicit definitions which will benefit the theory situation process.”
From The Ergonomics of Learning: A Proposed Update to Bloom’s Taxonomy (2025) · cites this paper as Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015)
Citations
Cites
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
The Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527
Social psychology: handbook of basic principles
Higgins, E., & Kruglanski, A. (2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.45-3496 · Cited by 5,535
Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.74.5.1252 · Cited by 5,312
Plans and the structure of behavior.
Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960) · doi:10.1037/10039-000 · Cited by 4,630
Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons
Schultz, W. (1998) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1 · Cited by 4,564
Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle?
Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.2.247 · Cited by 4,510
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Atkinson JW, 1978, An Introduction to Motivation
- Awasthi V, 1990, Account. Rev., 65, 797
- Tops M, 2004, Gedrag Organ., 17, 32
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nigg, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12675 · Cited by 1,518
Toward a rational and mechanistic account of mental effort
Shenhav, A., Musslick, S., Lieder, F., Kool, W., Griffiths, T. L., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. M. (2017) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationDorsal anterior cingulate cortex and the value of control
Shenhav, A., Cohen, J. D., & Botvinick, M. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4384 · Cited by 624
Self-citationThe dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in acute and chronic pain
Seminowicz, D. A., & Moayedi, M. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2017.03.008 · Cited by 502
DeLuca, V., Rothman, J., Bialystok, E., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1811513116 · Cited by 446
Metadata
- Authors
- Botvinick, M., & Braver, T.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Corresponding author
- Botvinick, Matthew
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2015-01-03
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 83-113
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2166756161
- Cited by
- 909
- References
- 221
- Citations by year
- 2026: 67 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 21
- FWCI
- 4.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R13AG042291)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH066078, R21MH097260, R01MH098815, R37 MH0660708)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- motivation, cognitive control, executive function, reward-based decision-making, neural mechanisms, behavioral economics, social psychology, cognitive psychology, control functions
- MeSH terms
- Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Cerebrum, Executive Function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review