Cited by 378Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition, Health, and Society StudiesDietary Effects on Health

Can We Say What Diet Is Best for Health?

Katz, D.L., Meller, S.·2014·Annual Review of Public Health

Abstract

Diet is established among the most important influences on health in modern societies. Injudicious diet figures among the leading causes of premature death and chronic disease. Optimal eating is associated with increased life expectancy, dramatic reduction in lifetime risk of all chronic disease, and amelioration of gene expression. In this context, claims abound for the competitive merits of various diets relative to one another. Whereas such claims, particularly when attached to commercial interests, emphasize distinctions, the fundamentals of virtually all eating patterns associated with meaningful evidence of health benefit overlap substantially. There have been no rigorous, long-term studies comparing contenders for best diet laurels using methodology that precludes bias and confounding, and for many reasons such studies are unlikely. In the absence of such direct comparisons, claims for the established superiority of any one specific diet over others are exaggerated. The weight of evidence strongly supports a theme of healthful eating while allowing for variations on that theme. A diet of minimally processed foods close to nature, predominantly plants, is decisively associated with health promotion and disease prevention and is consistent with the salient components of seemingly distinct dietary approaches. Efforts to improve public health through diet are forestalled not for want of knowledge about the optimal feeding of Homo sapiens but for distractions associated wit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182351

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Katz, D. L., & Meller, S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Public Health
Published
2014-03-18
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
83-103
ISSN
  • 0163-7525 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2093
OpenAlex
W2170900258
Cited by
378
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 8
FWCI
4.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Nutrition, Health, and Society Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
optimal diet, diet comparison, health promotion, disease prevention, plant-based diet, minimally processed foods, chronic disease, premature mortality, life expectancy, diet and gene expression, public health policy
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Health Status, Humans, Life Style, Public Health, Risk Factors, Diet, Vegetarian, Weight Loss, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review