The DOI matches its Crossref record; 139 of the 139 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cooperative Breeding and its Significance to the Demographic Success of Humans
Abstract
The demographic success of humans compared with other closely related species can be attributed to the relatively rapid pace of reproduction and improved chances of survival. The assistance that mothers receive from others to help raise children is a common theme in explaining this gain in surviving fertility. Cooperative breeding in its broad definition describes such a social system in which nonmaternal helpers support offspring who are not their own. In traditional societies, kin and nonkin of different ages and sex contribute both to child care and to provisioning older children. This review discusses empirical evidence for human cooperative breeding and its demographic significance and highlights the ways in which humans are similar to and different from other cooperative breeders. An emphasis is placed on cross-cultural comparison and variability in allocare strategies. Because helping in humans occurs within a subsistence pattern of food sharing and labor cooperation, both kin selection and mutualism may explain why children are often raised with nonmaternal help. Cooperative breeding is relevant to debates in anthropology concerning the evolution of human life history, sociality, and psychology and has implications for demographic patterns in today's world as well as in the past.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
The Evolution of Reciprocal Altruism
Trivers, R. L. (1971) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/406755 · Cited by 11,010
Parental Investment and Sexual Selection
(2017) · Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man · doi:10.4324/9781315129266-7 · Cited by 9,510
Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man: The Darwinian Pivot
(2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315129266 · Cited by 7,252
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126
The Optimal Balance between Size and Number of Offspring
Smith, C. C., & Fretwell, S. D. (1974) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282929 · Cited by 2,918
Putting the Altruism Back into Altruism: The Evolution of Empathy
de Waal, F. B. M. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625 · Cited by 2,483 · cited 3×
“Second, kin-biased behaviors may be motivated by factors other than kin selection (Coall & Hertwig 2010, de Waal 2008, Silk 2006).”
BackgroundMothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding
(2010) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-3250 · Cited by 1,744
Worldwide Variation in Human Growth
Eveleth, P. B., & Tanner, J. M. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511629105 · Cited by 1,442
The !Kung San: Men, Women and Work in a Foraging Society.
Ingold, T., & Lee, R. B. (1981) · Man · doi:10.2307/2801993 · Cited by 1,400
Cited by
Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior
Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-394281-4.00002-7 · Cited by 770
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., et al. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400106x · Cited by 639
The Origins and Psychology of Human Cooperation
Henrich, J., & Muthukrishna, M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-081920-042106 · Cited by 457
Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00230 · Cited by 148
Self-citationAbraham, E., & Feldman, R. (2018) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.034 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Kramer, K. L.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Anthropology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2010-10-21
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 417-436
- ISSN
- 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4290
- OpenAlex
- W2111122711
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 139
- FWCI
- 1.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cooperative Breeding and its Significance to the Demographic Success of Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054
- The paper
- Kramer, K. L. (2010). Cooperative Breeding and its Significance to the Demographic Success of Humans. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.105054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.