Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,176

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Discourse Analysis

Blommaert, Jan, Bulcaen, Chris·2000·Annual Review of Anthropology

Abstract

▪ Abstract This paper provides a survey of critical discourse analysis (CDA), a recent school of discourse analysis that concerns itself with relations of power and inequality in language. CDA explicitly intends to incorporate social-theoretical insights into discourse analysis and advocates social commitment and interventionism in research. The main programmatic features and domains of enquiry of CDA are discussed, with emphasis on attempts toward theory formation by one of CDA's most prominent scholars, Norman Fairclough. Another section reviews the genesis and disciplinary growth of CDA, mentions some of the recent critical reactions to it, and situates it within the wider picture of a new critical paradigm developing in a number of language-oriented (sub) disciplines. In this critical paradigm, topics such as ideology, inequality, and power figure prominently, and many scholars productively attempt to incorporate social-theoretical insights into the study of language.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 153

  1. 10.2307/1170635 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Althusser L, 1971, Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays.
  3. 10.1075/pbns.22 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Barthes R, 1956, Mythologies.
  5. 10.4324/9780203448885 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Barton D, 2000, Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context.
  7. Barton D, 1991, Writing in the Community.
  8. 10.1146/annurev.an.19.100190.000423 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Baynham M, 1995, Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts.
  10. Baynham M, Slembrouck S, eds. 1999. Speech Representation and Institutional Discourse . Special Issue Text 19(4):459–592 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/0957926599010004005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/0957926599010004007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Birch D. 1998. Criticism, linguistic. In Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics , ed. J Mey, pp. 190–94. Oxford, UK: Pergamon/Elsevier
  14. Bloch M, 1975, Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Societies.
  15. 10.1075/lplp.20.3.01blo · DOI
  16. 10.1075/prag.7.1.04blo · doi:10.1075/prag.7.1.04blo
  17. Blommaert J, 1997, Workshopping: notes on professional vision in discourse analysis. Antwerp Pap. Linguist., Vol. 91.
  18. 10.1515/9783110808049 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Blommaert J, 1997, Political Linguistics.
  20. Bourdieu P, 1991, Language and Symbolic Power.
  21. Brenneis DL, 1984, Dangerous Words: Language and Politics in the Pacific.
  22. Briggs C, 1996, Disorderly Discourse: Narrative, Conflict and Inequality., 10.1093/oso/9780195087765.001.0001 · DOI
  23. Briggs C. 1997a. Notes on a ‘confession’: the construction of gender, sexuality and violence in an infanticide case. SeeBriggs 1997b, pp. 519–46 · DOI
  24. Briggs C, ed. 1997b. Conflict and Violence in Pragmatic Research . Special issue Pragmatics 7(4):451–633 · DOI
  25. Caldas-Coulthard CR. 1993. From discourse analysis to critical discourse analysis: the differential representation of women and men speaking in written news. In Techniques of Description: Spoken and Written Discourse , ed. JM Sinclair, M Hoey, G Fox, pp. 196–208. London: Routledge
  26. Caldas-Coulthard CR. 1996. ‘Women who pay for sex. And enjoy it’: transgression versus morality in women's magazines. SeeCaldas-Coulthard & Coulthard 1996, pp. 250–70
  27. Caldas-Coulthard CR, 1996, Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.
  28. Cameron D, 1995, Verbal Hygiene.
  29. Cameron D, 1992, Researching Language: Issues of Power and Method.
  30. 10.1075/pbns.36 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/0957926598009001001 · DOI
  32. Chouliaraki L, 1999, Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis.
  33. Clark R, 1989, Lang. Educ., 4, 249, 10.1080/09500789009541291 · DOI
  34. Clark R, 1990, Lang. Educ., 5, 41, 10.1080/09500789109541298 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/096394709800700203 · DOI
  36. Collins J, 1998, Understanding Tolowa Histories: Western Hegemonies and Native American Responses.
  37. Cope B, 2000, Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures.
  38. 10.1075/pbns.40 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0378-2166(88)90017-3 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1017/CBO9780511810190 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Duranti A, 1992, Rethinking Context.
  42. Eelen G. 1999. Ideology in politeness: a critical analysis . PhD thesis. Univ. Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. 353 pp.
  43. Errington JJ. 1998. Indonesian('s) development: on the state of a language of state. SeeSchieffelin et al 1998, pp. 271–84 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0013
  44. Fabian J, 1986, Language and Colonial Power.
  45. 10.1075/cll.7 · DOI
  46. Fairclough N, 1989, Language and Power.
  47. 10.1177/0957926592003002004 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Fairclough N, 1995, Media Discourse.
  49. Fairclough N, 1995, Critical Discourse Analysis.
  50. 10.1177/096394709600500105 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Fairclough N, Mauranen A. 1997. The conversationalization of political discourse: a comparative view. SeeBlommaert & Bulcaen 1997, pp. 89–119 · DOI
  52. Figueroa E, 1994, Sociolinguistic Metatheory.
  53. Firth A, 1995, The Discourse of Negotiation: Studies of Language in the Workplace.
  54. 10.1007/978-1-349-26135-2 · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26135-2
  55. Foucault M, 1971, L'Ordre du Discours.
  56. Foucault M, 1977, Discipline and Punish.
  57. Fowler R. 1996. On Critical Linguistics. SeeCaldas-Coulthard & Coulthard 1996, pp. 3–14
  58. Fowler R, 1979, Language and Control.
  59. 10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.002021 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Gal S, Woolard K, ed. 1995. Constructing Languages and Publics . Special Issue Pragmatics 5(2):129–282 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Giddens A, 1984, The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration.
  62. 10.1525/aa.1994.96.3.02a00100 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Grimshaw AD, 1990, Conflict Talk: Sociolinguistic Investigations of Arguments in Conversation.
  64. Grossen M, Orvig AS, eds. 1998. Clinical Interviews as Verbal Interactions: A Multidisciplinary Outlook . Special Issue Pragmatics 8(2):149–297 · DOI
  65. Gunnarsson BL, 1997, The Construction of Professional Discourse.
  66. Habermas J, 1984, The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society.
  67. Habermas J, 1987, The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason.
  68. Hall C, Sarangi S, Slembrouck S. 1997. Moral construction in social work discourse. See Gunnarson et al 1997, pp. 265– 91
  69. 10.1146/annurev.an.18.100189.000523 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1016/0378-2166(94)00008-3 · DOI
  71. Hawisher GE, 2000, Global Literacies and the World-Wide Web.
  72. 10.1017/CBO9780511841057 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1515/9783110885941 · DOI
  74. Heller M, 1999, Linguistic Minorities and Modernity: A Sociolinguistic Ethnography.
  75. Hodge R, 1979, Language as Ideology.
  76. Hodge R, 1993, Language as Ideology.
  77. Hymes DH, 1996, Ethnography, Linguistics, Narrative Inequality: Toward an Understanding of Voice.
  78. 10.1525/ae.1989.16.2.02a00040 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Irvine J. 1995. The family romance of colonial linguistics: gender and family in nineteenth-century representations of African languages. SeeGal & Wolard 1995, pp. 139–53. · DOI
  80. 10.1075/swll.5 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1515/9783110801064 · DOI · Paper page
  82. Jaworski A, 1999, The Discourse Reader.
  83. Joseph JE, 1990, Ideologies of Language.
  84. Kienpointner M, ed. 1999. Ideologies of Politeness . Special Issue Pragmatics 9(1):1–176 · DOI
  85. Kress G. 1994. Text and grammar as explanation. In Text, Discourse and Context: Representations of Poverty in Britain , ed. UH Meinhof, K Richardson, pp. 24–46. London: Longman
  86. Kress G, 1997, Before Writing. Rethinking the Paths to Literacy.
  87. Kress G, 1996, Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design.
  88. Kuzar R, 1997, Pragmatics, 7, 21
  89. Laclau E, 1985, Hegemony and Socialist Strategy.
  90. Laurendeau P. 1990. Theory of emergence: towards a historical-materialistic approach to the history of linguistics. SeeJoseph & Taylor 1990, pp. 206–20
  91. Linell P, Sarangi S, eds. 1998. Discourse Across Professional Boundaries . Special Issue Text 18(2):143–318 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Martin JR. 2000. Close reading: functional linguistics as a tool for critical discourse analysis. In Researching Language in Schools and Communities: Functional Linguistic Perspectives , ed. L Unsworth, pp. 275–302. London: Cassell
  93. 10.1177/0957926595006001004 · DOI
  94. 10.1177/0957926597008004005 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1075/prag.2.3.04mer · DOI
  96. 10.1075/pbcs.3 · DOI
  97. 10.4324/9780203267424 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Milroy J, 1999, Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English.
  99. 10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u · DOI · Paper page
  100. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.25.1.19 · DOI · Paper page
  101. 10.1093/applin/15.2.115 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Rampton B, 1995, Crossing: Language and Ethnicity Among Adolescents.
  103. 10.1016/0271-5309(86)90024-8 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Sarangi S, 1996, Language, Bureaucracy and Social Control.
  105. Schäffner C, 1995, Language and Peace.
  106. 10.1177/0957926597008002002 · DOI · Paper page
  107. 10.1177/0957926598009003006 · DOI · Paper page
  108. 10.1177/0957926599010004006 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1177/0957926599010004008 · DOI
  110. Schieffelin BB, Doucet RC. 1998. The ‘real’ Haitian Creole: ideology, metalinguistics, and orthographic choice. SeeSchieffelin et al 1998, pp. 285–316 · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195105612.003.0014
  111. Schieffelin BB, 1998, Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory., 10.1093/oso/9780195105612.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Silverstein M. 1979. Language structure and linguistic ideology. In The Elements: A Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels , ed. PR Clyne, WF Hanks, CL Hofbauer, pp. 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguist. Soc.
  113. Silverstein M. 1996. Monoglot ‘standard’ in America: standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology , ed. D. Brenneis, RS Macaulay, pp. 284–306. Boulder, CO: Westview · DOI · Paper page
  114. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.401 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Silverstein M, 1996, Natural Histories of Discourse.
  116. 10.1080/10350339309384421 · DOI
  117. Slembrouck S. 1995. Channel. SeeVerschueren et al 1995, pp. 1–20. · doi:10.1075/hop.1.cha1
  118. Spitulnik D. 1998. Mediating unity and diversity: the production of language ideologies in Zambian broadcasting. SeeSchieffelin et al 1998, pp. 163–88 · DOI
  119. Street B, 1995, Social Literacies: Critical Approaches to Literacy in Development, Ethnography and Education.
  120. Stubbs M. 1997. Whorf's children: critical comments on CDA. In Evolving Models of Language , ed. A Ryan, A Wray, pp. 100–16. Milton Keynes, UK: Multilingual Matters
  121. Talbot M. 1992. The construction of gender in a teenage magazine. SeeFairclough 1992a, pp. 174–99
  122. Thompson JB, 1990, Ideology and Modern Culture.
  123. 10.1177/096394709800700305 · DOI
  124. 10.1177/096394709700600201 · DOI · Paper page
  125. van Dijk T, 1987, Communicating Racism: Ethnic Prejudice in Thought and Talk.
  126. van Dijk T, 1991, Racism and the Press.
  127. van Dijk T, 1993, J. Pragmat., 9, 739
  128. 10.4135/9781483326184 · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.1177/0957926593004002006 · DOI · Paper page
  130. van Dijk T. 1995. Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. SeeSchäffner & Wenden 1995, pp. 17–33
  131. van Dijk T. 1997. What is political discourse analysis? SeeBlommaert & Bulcaen 1997, pp. 11–52 · DOI · Paper page
  132. van Dijk T, 1998, Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach.
  133. 10.1177/0957926593004002004 · DOI · Paper page
  134. van Leeuwen T. 1996. The representation of social actors. SeeCaldas-Coulthard & Coulthard 1996, pp. 32–70
  135. 10.1177/1461445699001001005 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Verschueren J, 1999, Selected Pap. 6th Int. Pragmat. Conf.
  137. Verschueren J, 1995, Handbook of Pragmatics 1995.
  138. 10.1177/096394709800700302 · DOI
  139. 10.1177/0957926598009003005 · DOI · Paper page
  140. 10.1177/096394709500400301 · DOI · Paper page
  141. 10.1177/096394709600500106 · DOI
  142. 10.1093/applin/19.1.136 · DOI · Paper page
  143. Williams G, 1992, Sociolinguistics: A Sociological Critique.
  144. Wilson J, 1990, Politically Speaking. The Pragmatic Analysis of Political Language.
  145. 10.1075/ct.7 · DOI · Paper page
  146. Wodak R. 1995. Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. SeeVerschueren et al 1995, pp. 204–10 · DOI · Paper page
  147. Wodak R, 1996, Disorders of Discourse.
  148. Wodak R. 1997. Critical discourse analysis and the study of doctor-patient interaction. SeeGunnarsson et al 1997, pp. 173–200
  149. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.175 · DOI · Paper page
  150. 10.1525/ae.1985.12.4.02a00090 · DOI · Paper page
  151. Woolard K, 1989, Double Talk: Bilingualism and the Politics of Ethnicity in Catalonia., 10.1515/9781503624443 · DOI · Paper page
  152. Woolard KA. 1998. Language ideology as a field of inquiry. SeeSchieffelin et al 1998, pp. 3–47 · DOI · Paper page
  153. 10.1146/annurev.an.23.100194.000415 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C.
Venue
Annual Review of Anthropology
Published
2000-10
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
447-466
ISSN
  • 0084-6570 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-4290
OpenAlex
W3023465288
Cited by
1,176
References
4
FWCI
22.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Discourse Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447
The paper
Blommaert, J., & Bulcaen, C. (2000). Critical Discourse Analysis. Annual Review of Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.29.1.447

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.