The DOI matches its Crossref record; 179 of the 179 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory
Open accessAbstract
The ability to recognize a previously experienced stimulus is supported by two processes: recollection of the stimulus in the context of other information associated with the experience, and a sense of familiarity with the features of the stimulus. Although familiarity and recollection are functionally distinct, there is considerable debate about how these kinds of memory are supported by regions in the medial temporal lobes (MTL). Here, we review evidence for the distinction between recollection and familiarity and then consider the evidence regarding the neural mechanisms of these processes. Evidence from neuropsychological, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological studies of humans, monkeys, and rats indicates that different subregions of the MTL make distinct contributions to recollection and familiarity. The data suggest that the hippocampus is critical for recollection but not familiarity. The parahippocampal cortex also contributes to recollection, possibly via the representation and retrieval of contextual (especially spatial) information, whereas perirhinal cortex contributes to and is necessary for familiarity-based recognition. The findings are consistent with an anatomically guided hypothesis about the functional organization of the MTL and suggest mechanisms by which the anatomical components of the MTL interact to support the phenomenology of recollection and familiarity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For instance, the medial temporal, medial prefrontal, midline and parietal brain regions make up a ‘core network’ that is engaged during episodic recall and imagining the future [25–27,33–36]”
From Is episodic-like memory like episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [35]
In the citing paper
“the PHC has been implicated in memory for specific context information”
From Delay-dependent contributions of medial temporal lobe regions to episodic memory retrieval (2015) · cites this paper as Eichenbaum et al., 2007
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-0626 · Cited by 4,726
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research
Yonelinas, A. P. (2002) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.2002.2864 · Cited by 3,840
Self-citationA process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory
Jacoby, L. L. (1991) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(91)90025-f · Cited by 3,817
Object vision and spatial vision: Two cortical pathways
Mishkin, M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Macko, K. A. (1983) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(83)90190-x · Cited by 2,947
Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R., & Martin, A. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006 · Cited by 2,256
Hippocampus, space, and memory
Olton, D. S., Becker, J. T., & Handelmann, G. E. (1979) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00062713 · Cited by 2,018
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-02950.1986 · Cited by 1,997
How many memory systems are there?
Tulving, E. (1985) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.40.4.385 · Cited by 1,909
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
Differential Effects of Early Hippocampal Pathology on Episodic and Semantic Memory
Vargha-Khadem, F., Gadian, D. G., Watkins, K. E., Connelly, A., Van Paesschen, W., & Mishkin, M. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5324.376 · Cited by 1,746
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- 10.1037//0735-7044.107.5.715 · DOI
- Squire LR, 1994, Memory Systems, 203
- 10.1037//0003-066X.40.4.385 · DOI · Paper page
- Weis S, 2004, Neuroreport, 15, 2729
- 10.1037//0894-4105.12.3.323 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Pattern separation in the hippocampus
Yassa, M. A., & Stark, C. E. L. (2011) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2011.06.006 · Cited by 1,544
Interplay of Hippocampus and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Preston, A. R., & Eichenbaum, H. (2013) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.05.041 · Cited by 1,389
Self-citationTwo cortical systems for memory-guided behaviour
Ranganath, C., & Ritchey, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3338 · Cited by 1,377
Self-citationThe hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing
Bird, C. M., & Burgess, N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2335 · Cited by 1,313
The ventral visual pathway: an expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality
Kravitz, D. J., Saleem, K. S., Baker, C. I., Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (2012) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.011 · Cited by 1,204
Metadata
- Authors
- Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- Department of Psychology, University of California, Davis, California 95616;,
- Venue
- Annual Review of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2007-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-152
- ISSN
- 0147-006X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-4126
- PMC
- PMC2064941
- OpenAlex
- W2170972933
- Semantic Scholar
- 9d620ada4eec7c2732dc3b390cc95adc3d39387c
- Cited by
- 2,580
- References
- 169
- Citations by year
- 2026: 73 · 2025: 122 · 2024: 108 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 150 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 148 · 2017: 165 · 2016: 141 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 149 · 2013: 185 · 2012: 173
- FWCI
- 9.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Annual Review of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-71702, MH67821, MH059352, MH51570, R01MH051570, MH 52090, R01MH083734, P50MH071702, R01MH059352, R01MH052090)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS40813, P01NS040813)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- medial temporal lobe, recognition memory, recollection, familiarity, hippocampus, parahippocampal cortex, perirhinal cortex, contextual memory, spatial memory, memory retrieval
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Evoked Potentials, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Temporal Lobe, Parahippocampal Gyrus, Recognition, Psychology, Models, Animal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review