The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Intergroup Relations
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in Firms
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2893 · Cited by 4,164
Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range
Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3556658 · Cited by 3,592
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.413 · Cited by 2,385
Multidimensional Model of Racial Identity: A Reconceptualization of African American Racial Identity
Sellers, R. M., Smith, M. A., Shelton, J. N., Rowley, S. A. J., & Chavous, T. M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_2 · Cited by 1,748
The common ingroup identity model: recategorization and the reduction of intergroup bias.
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779343000004 · Cited by 1,559
“Benefits of Collaborative Learning.”
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091 · Cited by 1,107
Bell, S. T., Villado, A. J., Lukasik, M. A., Belau, L., & Briggs, A. L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206310365001 · Cited by 907
Can race be erased? Coalitional computation and social categorization.
Kurzban, R., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.251541498 · Cited by 870
Matsumoto, D., Yoo, S. H., & Fontaine, J. (2008) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022107311854 · Cited by 864
Assimilation and diversity: an integrative model of subgroup relations.
Hornsey, M. J., & Hogg, M. A. (2000) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_03 · Cited by 756
Social Identity Theory's Self-Esteem Hypothesis: A Review and Some Suggestions for Clarification
Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0201_3 · Cited by 689
A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice
Bigler, R. S., & Liben, L. S. (2006) · Advances in Child Development and Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80004-2 · Cited by 481
Extending the Benefits of Recategorization: Evaluations, Self-Disclosure, and Helping
Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Validzic, A., Matoka, K., Johnson, B., & Frazier, S. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1997.1327 · Cited by 470
Intergroup conflict: individual, group, and collective interests
Bornstein, G. (2003) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0702_129-145 · Cited by 365
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggression
Lickel, B., Miller, N., Stenstrom, D. M., Denson, T. F., & Schmader, T. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_6 · Cited by 345
The use of impression management tactics in structured interviews: A function of question type?
Ellis, A. P. J., West, B. J., Ryan, A. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2002) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.6.1200 · Cited by 293
Changing Interracial Evaluations and Behavior: The Effects of a Common Group Identity
Nier, J. A., Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Banker, B. S., Ward, C. M., & Rust, M. C. (2001) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430201004004001 · Cited by 215
Remorse, Confession, Group Identity, and Expectancies About Repeating a Transgression
Gold, G. J., & Weiner, B. (2000) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15324834basp2204_3 · Cited by 216
Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010) · Handbook of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy002028 · Cited by 133
Constituents of political cognition: Race, party politics, and the alliance detection system
Pietraszewski, D., Curry, O. S., Petersen, M. B., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.03.007 · Cited by 132
Self-Esteem and Favoritism Toward Novel In-Groups: The Self as an Evaluative Base.
Gramzow, R. H., & Gaertner, L. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.5.801 · Cited by 116
Group status and perceptions of homogeneity
Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792779843000045 · Cited by 105
Stewart, K., & Townley, G. (2020) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/ajcp.12456 · Cited by 75
Large-Scale Observational Evidence of Cross-Cultural Differences in Facial Behavior
McDuff, D., Girard, J. M., & Kaliouby, R. E. (2017) · Journal of Nonverbal Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10919-016-0244-x · Cited by 60
Effects of Stereotypes and Outcome Dependency on the Processing of Information about Group Members
Bogart, L. M., Ryan, C. S., & Stefanov, M. (1999) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430299021003 · Cited by 10
Moral Observer-Licensing in Cyberspace
Ran, Y., Hou, Y., Dong, Z., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs12050148 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Messick, D. M., & Mackie, D. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 1989-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45-81
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W4212904330
- Cited by
- 547
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.