The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Spontaneous Inferences, Implicit Impressions, and Implicit Theories
Abstract
People make social inferences without intentions, awareness, or effort, i.e., spontaneously. We review recent findings on spontaneous social inferences (especially traits, goals, and causes) and closely related phenomena. We then describe current thinking on some of the most relevant processes, implicit knowledge, and theories. These include automatic and controlled processes and their interplay; embodied cognition, including mimicry; and associative versus rule-based processes. Implicit knowledge includes adult folk theories, conditions of personhood, self-knowledge to simulate others, and cultural and social class differences. Implicit theories concern Bayesian networks, recent attribution research, and questions about the utility of the disposition-situation dichotomy. Developmental research provides new insights. Spontaneous social inferences include a growing array of phenomena, but they have been insufficiently linked to other phenomena and theories. We hope the links suggested in this review begin to remedy this.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference
Pearl, J. (2009) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803161 · Cited by 11,653
Barsalou, L. W. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 · Cited by 5,936
Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition.
Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.2.291 · Cited by 4,263
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114
Dehumanization: An integrative review
Haslam, N. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4 · Cited by 2,919 · cited 1×
“Haslam (2006) proposed that there are two ways of dehumanizing others: “denying uniquely human attributes . . . represents them as animallike, and denying human nature . . . represents them as objects or automata” (p. 253).”
BackgroundFirst Impressions: Making Up Your Mind After a 100-Ms Exposure to a Face
Willis, J., & Todorov, A. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x · Cited by 2,300
Human abilities: emotional intelligence
Mayer, J. D., Roberts, R. D., & Barsade, S. G. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646 · Cited by 2,170
Social Cognitive Neuroscience: A Review of Core Processes
Lieberman, M. D. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654 · Cited by 2,010
Social evaluation by preverbal infants
Hamlin, J. K., Wynn, K., & Bloom, P. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06288 · Cited by 1,566
Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion
Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0903_1 · Cited by 1,484
Ito, T. A., & Urland, G. R. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.616 · Cited by 697
Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives
Sloman, S. (2005) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183115.001.0001 · Cited by 677
Perspective taking in children and adults: equivalent egocentrism but differential correction
Epley, N., Morewedge, C. K., & Keysar, B. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.002 · Cited by 594
Psychological essentialism in children
GELMAN, S. (2004) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.001 · Cited by 492
“Mother's Face Recognition in Newborn Infants: Learning and Memory”
Bushnell, I. W. R. (2001) · Infant and Child Development · doi:10.1002/icd.248 · Cited by 303
Seeing Versus Doing: Two Modes of Accessing Causal Knowledge.
Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2005) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.2.216 · Cited by 190
Gawronski, B. (2004) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280440000026 · Cited by 162 · cited 1×
“Gawronski (2004) focuses on implicit theories of situational influences.”
BackgroundBeauregard, K. S., & Dunning, D. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.606 · Cited by 134 · cited 1×
“Threatened self-esteem leads to “egocentric contrast” in perceiving others (Beauregard & Dunning 1998).”
BackgroundKammrath, L. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., & Mischel, W. (2005) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.605 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
The social distance theory of power
Magee, J. C., & Smith, P. K. (2013) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868312472732 · Cited by 620
Associative processes in intuitive judgment
Morewedge, C. K., & Kahneman, D. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.07.004 · Cited by 492
Bridging the Gap between Social Animal and Unsocial Machine: A Survey of Social Signal Processing
Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., Heylen, D., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I., D'Errico, F., & Schroeder, M. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/t-affc.2011.27 · Cited by 381
Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior
Hassabis, D., Spreng, R. N., Rusu, A. A., Robbins, C. A., Mar, R. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht042 · Cited by 247
Metadata
- Authors
- Uleman, J. S., Adil Saribay, S., & Gonzalez, C. M.
- Venue
- Annual Review of Psychology
- Publisher
- Annual Reviews
- Published
- 2008-01-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 329-360
- ISSN
- 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-2085
- OpenAlex
- W2161151711
- Cited by
- 505
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 19.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
