Cited by 247Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFace Recognition and PerceptionAction Observation and Synchronization

Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior

Open access
Hassabis, Demis, Spreng, R. Nathan, Rusu, Andrei A., Robbins, Clifford A., Mar, Raymond A., Schacter, Daniel L.·2014·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The behaviors of other people are often central to envisioning the future. The ability to accurately predict the thoughts and actions of others is essential for successful social interactions, with far-reaching consequences. Despite its importance, little is known about how the brain represents people in order to predict behavior. In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, participants learned the unique personality of 4 protagonists and imagined how each would behave in different scenarios. The protagonists' personalities were composed of 2 traits: Agreeableness and Extraversion. Which protagonist was being imagined was accurately inferred based solely on activity patterns in the medial prefrontal cortex using multivariate pattern classification, providing novel evidence that brain activity can reveal whom someone is thinking about. Lateral temporal and posterior cingulate cortex discriminated between different degrees of agreeableness and extraversion, respectively. Functional connectivity analysis confirmed that regions associated with trait-processing and individual identities were functionally coupled. Activity during the imagination task, and revealed by functional connectivity, was consistent with the default network. Our results suggest that distinct regions code for personality traits, and that the brain combines these traits to represent individuals. The brain then uses this "personality model" to predict the behavior of others in novel situations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bht042

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The DMN and its imaginative capacities may instantiate this kind of creative dynamo, constituting sources of strongly internally coherent predictions, thus being capable of temporarily absorbing and then releasing free energy via the shaping of perception and driving of action.

    “The DMN and its imaginative capacities (Beaty et al., 2014, 2015, 2018; Hassabis et al., 2014) may instantiate this kind of (informational) creative dynamo, constituting sources of strongly internally coherent predictions, thus being capable of temporarily absorbing and then releasing free energy via the shaping of perception and driving of action.”

    From An Integrated World Modeling Theory (IWMT) of Consciousness (2020) · cites this paper as Hassabis et al., 2014

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassabis, D., Spreng, R. N., Rusu, A. A., Robbins, C. A., Mar, R. A., & Schacter, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit (GB)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Hassabis, Demis
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2013-03-05
Volume
24
Issue
8
Pages
1979-1987
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2107473960
Cited by
247
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 060941, R01MH060941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
personality models, medial prefrontal cortex, agreeableness, extraversion, default mode network, functional connectivity, social cognition, personality traits, multivariate pattern classification
MeSH terms
Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Imagination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Personality, Social Perception, Thinking, Young Adult, Theory of Mind

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review