The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative MR Imaging of Brain Iron: A Postmortem Validation Study
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between transverse relaxation rates R2 and R2*, the most frequently used surrogate markers for iron in brain tissue, and chemically determined iron concentrations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee, and informed consent was obtained from each individual's next of kin. Quantitative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was performed at 3.0 T in seven human postmortem brains in situ (age range at death, 38-81 years). Following brain extraction, iron concentrations were determined with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry in prespecified gray and white matter regions and correlated with R2 and R2* by using linear regression analysis. Hemispheric differences were tested with paired t tests. RESULTS: The highest iron concentrations were found in the globus pallidus (mean ± standard deviation, 205 mg/kg wet mass ± 32), followed by the putamen (mean, 153 mg/kg wet mass ± 29), caudate nucleus (mean, 92 mg/kg wet mass ± 15), thalamus (mean, 49 mg/kg wet mass ± 11), and white matter regions. When all tissue samples were considered, transverse relaxation rates showed a strong linear correlation with iron concentration throughout the brain (r² = 0.67 for R2, r² = 0.90 for R2*; P < .001). In white matter structures, only R2* showed a linear correlation with iron concentration. Chemical analysis revealed significantly higher iron concentrations in the left hemisphere than in the right hemisphere, a finding that was not reflected in the relaxation rates. CONCLUSION: Because of their strong linear correlation with iron concentration, both R2 and R2* can be used to measure iron deposition in the brain. Because R2* is more sensitive than R2 to variations in brain iron concentration and can detect differences in white matter, it is the preferred parameter for the assessment of iron concentration in vivo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Andrews, N. C. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199912233412607 · Cited by 2,130
The effect of age on the non-haemin iron in the human brain
Hallgren, B., & Sourander, P. (1958) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1958.tb12607.x · Cited by 1,427
Bloch Equations with Diffusion Terms
Torrey, H. C. (1956) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.104.563 · Cited by 1,216
Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissues: The static dephasing regime
Yablonskiy, D. A., & Haacke, E. M. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910320610 · Cited by 1,198
Bottomley, P. A., Foster, T. H., Argersinger, R. E., & Pfeifer, L. M. (1984) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1118/1.595535 · Cited by 1,192
Imaging iron stores in the brain using magnetic resonance imaging
Haacke, E. M., Cheng, N. Y. C., House, M. J., Liu, Q., Neelavalli, J., Ogg, R. J., Khan, A., Ayaz, M., Kirsch, W., & Obenaus, A. (2005) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2004.10.001 · Cited by 995
Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review
Henkelman, R. M., Stanisz, G. J., & Graham, S. J. (2001) · NMR in Biomedicine · doi:10.1002/nbm.683 · Cited by 921
In vivo visualization of myelin water in brain by magnetic resonance
Mackay, A., Whittall, K., Adler, J., Li, D., Paty, D., & Graeb, D. (1994) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910310614 · Cited by 914
Ferritin and the response to oxidative stress
ORINO, K., LEHMAN, L., TSUJI, Y., AYAKI, H., TORTI, S. V., & TORTI, F. M. (2001) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj3570241 · Cited by 535
Gelman, N., Gorell, J. M., Barker, P. B., Savage, R. M., Spickler, E. M., Windham, J. P., & Knight, R. A. (1999) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.210.3.r99fe41759 · Cited by 373
Cited by
Langkammer, C., Schweser, F., Krebs, N., Deistung, A., Goessler, W., Scheurer, E., Sommer, K., Reishofer, G., Yen, K., Fazekas, F., et al. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.049 · Cited by 801
Self-citationSchweser, F., Deistung, A., Lehr, B. W., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.070 · Cited by 710
Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions
Haacke, E. M., Liu, S., Buch, S., Zheng, W., Wu, D., & Ye, Y. (2015) · Magnetic Resonance Imaging · doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.09.004 · Cited by 511
on behalf of the MAGNIMS study group (2015) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2015.157 · Cited by 473
Deistung, A., Schäfer, A., Schweser, F., Biedermann, U., Turner, R., & Reichenbach, J. R. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.09.055 · Cited by 442
Metadata
- Authors
- Langkammer, C., Krebs, N., Goessler, W., Scheurer, E., Ebner, F., Yen, K., Fazekas, F., & Ropele, S.
- Venue
- Radiology
- Published
- 2010-11
- Volume
- 257
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 455-462
- ISSN
- 0033-8419 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-1315
- OpenAlex
- W2125068099
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 38
- FWCI
- 14.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative MR Imaging of Brain Iron: A Postmortem Validation Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1148/radiol.10100495
- The paper
- Langkammer, C., Krebs, N., Goessler, W., Scheurer, E., Ebner, F., Yen, K., Fazekas, F., & Ropele, S. (2010). Quantitative MR Imaging of Brain Iron: A Postmortem Validation Study. Radiology. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.