Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effects of motor unit losses on strength in older men and women

Doherty, T. J., Vandervoort, A. A., Taylor, A. W., Brown, W. F.·1993·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

The influence of age-associated motor unit loss on contractile strength was investigated in a representative sample of healthy, active young and older men and women. In 24 younger subjects (22–38 yr) and 20 older subjects (60–81 yr) spike-triggered averaging was employed to extract a sample of surface-recorded single motor unit action potentials (S-MUAPs) from the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles. The amplitude of the maximum compound muscle action potential of the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles was divided by the mean S-MUAP amplitude to estimate the numbers of motor units present. The maximum isometric twitch contraction (MTC) and maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) of the elbow flexors were also recorded in 18 of the younger subjects and in all older subjects. The estimated numbers of motor units were significantly reduced (47%, P < 0.001) in older subjects with a mean value of 189 +/- 77 compared with a mean of 357 +/- 97 in younger subjects. The sizes of the S-MUAPs, however, were significantly larger in older subjects (23%, P < 0.01). Significant but less marked age-associated reductions in the MTC (33%, P < 0.05) and MVC (33%, P < 0.001) were also found and were similar for both men and women. These results suggest that motor unit losses, even in healthy active individuals, are a primary factor in the age-associated reductions in contractile strength.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jappl.1993.74.2.868

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Doherty, T. J., Vandervoort, A. A., Taylor, A. W., & Brown, W. F.
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
1993-02-01
Volume
74
Issue
2
Pages
868-874
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W1829383913
Cited by
379
References
0
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.