Cited by 103Estrogen and related hormone effectsHormonal and reproductive studiesAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

Effects of estrogen and progesterone administration on extracellular fluid.

Stachenfeld, Nina S., Taylor, Hugh S.·2004·Journal of Applied Physiology

Abstract

To determine the effect of estrogen and progesterone on plasma volume (PV) and extracellur fluid volume (ECFV), we suppressed endogenous estrogen and progesterone by using the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist ganirelix acetate in seven healthy women (22 ± 1 yr). Subjects were administered GnRH antagonist for 16 days. Beginning on day 5 of GnRH antagonist administration, subjects were administered estrogen (E 2) for 11 days, and beginning on day 12 of GnRH antagonist administration, subjects added progesterone (E 2-P 4) for 4 days. On days 2, 9, and 16 of GnRH antagonist administration, we estimated ECFV (inulin washout), transcapillary escape rate of albumin (TER alb), and PV (Evans blue dye). Plasma E 2 concentration increased from 17.9 ± 4.5 (GnRH antagonist) to 195.9 ± 60.1 (E 2, P < 0.05) to 245.6 ± 62.9 pg/ml (E 2-P 4, P < 0.05). Compared with GnRH antagonist (1.3 ± 0.5 ng/ml), plasma P 4 concentration was unchanged during E 2(0.9 ± 0.3 ng/ml) and increased to 9.4 ± 3.1 ng/ml during E 2-P 4( P < 0.05). Both E 2(44.1 ± 3.1 ml/kg) and E 2-P 4(47.7 ± 2.8 ml/kg) increased PV compared with GnRH antagonist (42.8 ± 1.3 ml/kg, P < 0.05). Within-subjects TER alb was a strong negative predictor of PV (mean r = 0.92 ± 0.03, P < 0.05), and TER alb was lowest during E 2-P 4(5.7 ± 0.5, 4.1.0 ± 1.1, and 2.8 ± 0.9%/h, P < 0.05, for GnRH antagonist, E 2, and E 2-P 4, respectively). ECFV was reduced during E 2(227 ± 31 ml/kg, P < 0.05) compared with both GnRH antagonist (291 ± 37 ml/kg) and E 2-P 4(283 ± 19 ml/kg). Thus the percentage of extracellular fluid in the plasma compartment increased to 21.0% ( P < 0.05) during E 2 compared with GnRH antagonist (16.1%) and E 2-P 4(17.2%) admistration. Thus E 2 increased PV via actions on the capillary endothelium to lower TER alb and favor intravascular water retention, whereas during E 2-P 4 PV increased via the combined responses of ECFV expansion and lower TER alb.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/japplphysiol.01032.2003

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stachenfeld, N. S., & Taylor, H. S.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Physiology
Published
2004-03
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
1011-1018
ISSN
  • 0161-7567 (ISSN-L)
  • 8750-7587
  • 1522-1601
OpenAlex
W2143893112
Cited by
103
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL-071159-01A1, R01-HL-62240-01A1, R01HL062240, R01HL071159)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
estrogen, progesterone, extracellular volume, plasma volume, Evans blue, ganirelix, GnRH antagonist, women, fluid balance, plasma protein binding, albumin binding, estrogen-progesterone interaction, hormone replacement therapy, hyperlipidemia
MeSH terms
Adult, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone, Luteal Phase, Plasma Volume, Progesterone, Extracellular Fluid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review