The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in maximal aerobic capacity with age in endurance-trained women: 7-yr follow-up
Abstract
On the basis of cross-sectional data, we previously reported that the absolute, but not the relative (%), rate of decline in maximal oxygen consumption (V˙o 2 max) with age is greater in endurance-trained compared with healthy sedentary women. We tested this hypothesis by using a longitudinal approach. Eight sedentary (63 ± 2 yr at follow-up) and 16 endurance-trained (57 ± 2) women were reevaluated after a mean follow-up period of 7 yr. At baseline,V˙o 2 max was ∼70% higher in endurance-trained women (48.1 ± 1.7 vs. 28.1 ± 0.8 ml · kg−1 · min−1 · yr−1). At follow-up, body mass, fat-free mass, maximal respiratory exchange ratio, and maximal rating of perceived exertion were not different from baseline in either group. The absolute rate of decline inV˙o 2 max was twice as great ( P < 0.01) in the endurance-trained (−0.84 ± 0.15 ml · kg−1 · min−1 · yr−1) vs. sedentary (−0.40 ± 0.12 ml · kg−1 · min−1 · yr−1) group, but the relative rates of decline were not different (−1.8 ± 0.3 vs. −1.5 ± 0.4% per year). Differences in rates of decline in V˙o 2 max were not related to changes in body mass or maximal heart rate. However, among endurance-trained women, the relative rate of decline inV˙o 2 max was positively related to reductions in training volume ( r = 0.63). Consistent with this, the age-related reduction inV˙o 2 max in a subgroup of endurance-trained women who maintained or increased training volume was not different from that of sedentary women. These longitudinal data indicate that the greater decrease in maximal aerobic capacity with advancing age observed in middle-aged and older endurance-trained women in general compared with their sedentary peers is due to declines in habitual exercise in some endurance-trained women. Endurance-trained women who maintain or increase training volume demonstrated age-associated declines in maximal aerobic capacity not different from healthy sedentary women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Exercise economy, referring to the oxygen or energy cost required to perform submaximal exercise, was mentioned in three studies [49,57,58], with in-depth analysis limited to just one study [58].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“However, when expressed as a percent loss per year, the relative rate (%·year−1) of decline was comparable between athletes and sedentary women [34,57,64].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Training volume emerged as a key and modifiable determinant of aerobic capacity where women who maintained training volume attenuated age-related declines [34,57].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Maximal heart rate consistently decreased with age regardless of fitness status [34,57,60,61,64], likely due to changes in intrinsic cardiac pacemaker function [70].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Longitudinal studies, which capture within-person changes, reported higher rates of decline compared to cross-sectional designs [34,35,43,57].”
From Effects of Aging on Determinants of Endurance Performance in Women Masters Athletes: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as [57]
5 more claims about this paper
Create a free account to see every claim other papers make about this one.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age-predicted maximal heart rate revisited
Tanaka, H., Monahan, K. D., & Seals, D. R. (2001) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01054-8 · Cited by 3,775 · cited 1×
“However, consistent with our previous crosssectional results (6, 18, 19), there was no obvious association between reductions in maximal heart rate and habitual exercise status.”
ResultSelf-citationPHYSICAL ACTIVITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY IN THE FIVE-CITY PROJECT1
SALLIS, J. F., HASKELL, W. L., WOOD, P. D., FORTMANN, S. P., ROGERS, T., BLAIR, S. N., & PAFFENBARGER, R. S. (1985) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113987 · Cited by 1,716
A physiological comparison of young and older endurance athletes
Heath, G. W., Hagberg, J. M., Ehsani, A. A., & Holloszy, J. O. (1981) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/jappl.1981.51.3.634 · Cited by 459 · cited 3×
“As an initial step, we used a meta-analytic approach to address this issue (6) and found that, in marked contrast to the prevailing view in men (7, 9, 11), the absolute rate of decline in V̇O2 max across age was greatest in the most physically active and smallest in the least active women (6).”
BackgroundMethod
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- 10.1001/jama.1989.03430170057028 · DOI · Paper page
- Buskirk ER, 1987, Fed Proc, 46, 1824
- 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.1.95 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1972.33.6.805 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1152/jappl.1995.78.5.1931 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.1.160 · DOI · Paper page
- Hagberg JM., 1987, Fed Proc, 46, 1830
- 10.1097/00005768-200110000-00020 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1249/00005768-199509000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00913847.1990.11710022 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.CIR.86.2.494 · DOI · Paper page
- Robinson S., 1938, Arbeitsphysiol, 10, 251
- Robinson S., 1973, Fed Proc, 32, 1628
- 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.4.1691 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.ATV.15.5.669 · DOI
- 10.1152/jappl.1997.83.6.1947 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/00005768-199710000-00013 · DOI
- 10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.3.H829 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Mental Exercise and Mental Aging: Evaluating the Validity of the “Use It or Lose It” Hypothesis
Salthouse, T. A. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00005.x · Cited by 679
Longitudinal Modeling of the Relationship between Age and Maximal Heart Rate
GELLISH, R. L., GOSLIN, B. R., OLSON, R. E., McDONALD, A., RUSSI, G. D., & MOUDGIL, V. K. (2007) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/mss.0b013e31803349c6 · Cited by 660
Exercise Attenuates the Major Hallmarks of Aging
Garatachea, N., Pareja-Galeano, H., Sanchis-Gomar, F., Santos-Lozano, A., Fiuza-Luces, C., Morán, M., Emanuele, E., Joyner, M. J., & Lucia, A. (2015) · Rejuvenation Research · doi:10.1089/rej.2014.1623 · Cited by 413
Tanaka, H., & Seals, D. R. (2003) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00320.2003 · Cited by 275
Self-citationDonato, A. J., Black, A. D., Jablonski, K. L., Gano, L. B., & Seals, D. R. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00438.x · Cited by 237
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eskurza, I., Donato, A. J., Moreau, K. L., Seals, D. R., & Tanaka, H.
- Affiliations
- Human Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Applied Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder 80309; and
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physiology
- Publisher
- American Physiological Society
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2303-2308
- ISSN
- 8750-7587
- 1522-1601
- Cited by
- 78
- References
- 3
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.