Cited by 100Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Predictive coding in autism spectrum disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Open access
Gonzalez-Gadea, Maria Luz, Chennu, Srivas, Bekinschtein, Tristan A., Rattazzi, Alexia, Beraudi, Ana, Tripicchio, Paula, Moyano, Beatriz, Soffita, Yamila +6 more·2015·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Predictive coding has been proposed as a framework to understand neural processes in neuropsychiatric disorders. We used this approach to describe mechanisms responsible for attentional abnormalities in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We monitored brain dynamics of 59 children (8-15 yr old) who had ASD or ADHD or who were control participants via high-density electroencephalography. We performed analysis at the scalp and source-space levels while participants listened to standard and deviant tone sequences. Through task instructions, we manipulated top-down expectation by presenting expected and unexpected deviant sequences. Children with ASD showed reduced superior frontal cortex (FC) responses to unexpected events but increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation to expected events. In contrast, children with ADHD exhibited reduced cortical responses in superior FC to expected events but strong PFC activation to unexpected events. Moreover, neural abnormalities were associated with specific control mechanisms, namely, inhibitory control in ASD and set-shifting in ADHD. Based on the predictive coding account, top-down expectation abnormalities could be attributed to a disproportionate reliance (precision) allocated to prior beliefs in ASD and to sensory input in ADHD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.00543.2015

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gonzalez-Gadea et al. (2015) found a reduced P300 amplitude for unexpected deviant stimuli in children with ADHD, which could reflect weaker top-down expectations resulting from an overemphasis on novel sensory evidence.

    “Indeed, Gonzalez-Gadea et al. (2015) found a reduced P300 amplitude for unexpected deviant stimuli in children with ADHD which could reflect weaker top-down expectations resulting from an overemphasis on novel sensory evidence.”

    From Are prediction error modifications domain specific in autism but domain general in ADHD? (2025) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Gadea et al. (2015)

    The 'Top-Down Expectation Indexed by the P300' section reports reduced P300 responses to unexpected deviants in children with ASD, not ADHD; the ADHD group showed a higher P300 response to unexpected deviants than to standard sequences. The 'Top-Down Expectation in Children with ADHD' section does suggest that novel sensory evidence receives high precision relative to task instructions, but it reports reduced P300 amplitude for expected deviants. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Children with autism spectrum disorder showed reduced activity in the bilateral superior frontal cortex in response to unexpected events and increased late activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to expected events.

    “Conversely, children with ASD showed reduced activity in the bilateral superior frontal cortex in response to unexpected events, and increased late activation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to expected events (Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015

    The P300 source-space results report reduced right superior frontal cortex activation in children with ASD during unexpected deviants, not reduced bilateral superior frontal activation (Fig. 6A–B). They also report greater late dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation in the ASD group during expected deviants (Fig. 4C–D). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Compared to healthy controls, individuals with autism spectrum disorder showed reduced P3 peak and reduced bilateral superior frontal cortex activation in response to unexpected events and increased late activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to expected events.

    “Compared to HC, individuals with ASD showed reduced P3 peak and reduced bilateral superior frontal cortex activation in response to unexpected events and increased late activation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in response to ex­ pected events (Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ADHD showed reduced attention-related P3 in the superior frontal cortex, coupled with increased late frontal activation to unexpected stimuli.

    “ADHD showed reduced attention-related P3 in the superior frontal cortex, coupled with increased late frontal activa­ tion to unexpected stimuli (Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015).”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015

  • Individuals with ADHD showed increased responsivity to task-irrelevant stimuli.

    “Contrariwise to ASD, individuals with ADHD showed an increased responsivity to task-irrelevant stimuli (Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015)”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Gonzalez-Gadea et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publish- ing, 2013.
  2. Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR. A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: II. Event-related potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 114: 184 -198, 2003.
  3. Bullmore ET, Suckling J, Overmeyer S, Rabe-Hesketh S, Taylor E, Brammer MJ. Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 18: 32-42, 1999.
  4. Frith U. Autism: Explaining the Enigma. Oxford: Blackwell, 1989.
  5. O'Connor K. Auditory processing in autism spectrum disorder: a review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 36: 836 -854, 2012.
  6. Wechsler D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation, 2003.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gonzalez-Gadea, M. L., Chennu, S., Bekinschtein, T. A., Rattazzi, A., Beraudi, A., Tripicchio, P., Moyano, B., Soffita, Y., Steinberg, L., Adolfi, F., Sigman, M., Marino, J., Manes, F., & Ibanez, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina;
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Programa Argentino para Niños, Adolescentes y Adultos con Condiciones del Espectro Autista (PANAACEA), Buenos Aires, Argentina;
  • Instituto de Neurología Cognitiva (AR)
  • Centro Interdisciplinario de Tourette, TOC, TDAH, y Trastornos Asociados (CITTTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina;
  • Favaloro University (AR)
  • Universidad Torcuato Di Tella (AR)
  • Facultad de Psicologia, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Cordoba, Argentina; and
  • Australian Research Council (AU)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2015-11
Volume
114
Issue
5
Pages
2625-2636
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W2168796115
Cited by
100
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
predictive coding, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, top-down expectations, superior frontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, inhibitory control, set-shifting, children
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Attention, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Auditory Perception, Child, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Male, Event-Related Potentials, P300

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review