Cited by 483Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Shape Representation in Area V4: Position-Specific Tuning for Boundary Conformation

Pasupathy, Anitha, Connor, Charles E.·2001·Journal of Neurophysiology

Abstract

Visual shape recognition in primates depends on a multi-stage pathway running from primary visual cortex (V1) to inferotemporal cortex (IT). The mechanisms by which local shape signals from V1 are transformed into selectivity for abstract object categories in IT are unknown. One approach to this issue is to investigate shape representation at intermediate stages in the pathway, such as area V4. We studied 109 V4 cells that appeared sensitive to complex shape in preliminary tests. To achieve a more complete picture of shape representation in V4, we tested each cell with a set of 366 stimuli, constructed by systematically combining convex and concave boundary elements into closed shapes. Using this large, diverse stimulus set, we found that all the cells in our sample responded to a wide variety of shapes and did not appear to encode any single type of global shape. However, for most cells the shapes evoking strongest responses were characterized by a consistent type of boundary conformation at a specific position within the stimulus. For example, a given cell might be tuned for shapes containing concave curvature at the right, with other parts of the shape having little or no effect on responses. Many cells were tuned for more complex boundary configurations (e.g., a convex angle adjacent to a concave curve). We quantified this kind of shape tuning with Gaussian functions on a curvature × position domain. These tuning functions fit the neural responses much better than tuning functions based on edge or axis orientation. Thus individual V4 cells appear to encode moderately complex boundary information at specific locations within larger shapes. This finding suggests that, at intermediate stages in the V1-IT transformation, complex objects are represented at least partly in terms of the configurations and positions of their contour components.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1152/jn.2001.86.5.2505

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some C2 units in the model show a tuning for boundary conformations consistent with recordings from V4.

    “some of the C 2 units in the model show a tuning for boundary conformations which is consistent with recordings from V4 (29)”

    From A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization (2007) · cites this paper as [29]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pasupathy, A., & Connor, C. E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurophysiology
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
2505-2519
ISSN
  • 0022-3077 (ISSN-L)
  • 1522-1598
OpenAlex
W1777366511
Cited by
483
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 31
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS 38034, P01NS038034)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
area V4, complex shapes, single neuron responses, visual cortex
MeSH terms
Animals, Electrophysiology, Female, Form Perception, Macaca mulatta, Neurons, Afferent, Photic Stimulation, Visual Cortex, Visual Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review