Cited by 101Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-beingReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Meditation for Work Stress, Anxiety and Depressed Mood in Full‐Time Workers

Open access
Manocha, R., Black, D., Sarris, J., Stough, C.·2011·Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

Objective. To assess the effect of meditation on work stress, anxiety and mood in full‐time workers. Methods. 178 adult workers participated in an 8‐week, 3‐arm randomized controlled trial comparing a “mental silence” approach to meditation (n = 59) to a “relaxation” active control (n = 56) and a wait‐list control (n = 63). Participants were assessed before and after using Psychological Strain Questionnaire (PSQ), a subscale of the larger Occupational Stress Inventory (OSI), the State component of the State/Trait Anxiety Inventory for Adults (STAI), and the depression‐dejection (DD) subscale of the Profile of Mood States (POMS). Results. There was a significant improvement for the meditation group compared to both the relaxation control and the wait‐list groups the PSQ (P = .026), and DD (P = .019). Conclusions. Mental silence‐orientated meditation, in this case Sahaja Yoga meditation, is a safe and effective strategy for dealing with work stress and depressive feelings. The findings suggest that “thought reduction” or “mental silence” may have specific effects relevant to work stress and hence occupational health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2011/960583

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The active control meditation was designed to match the mindfulness meditation intervention in structure, duration, and frequency while excluding explicit mindfulness techniques.

    “The ACM meditation was novel, informed by prior studies (Lindsay et al., 2019; Manocha et al., 2011; Ruscio et al., 2016) and designed to match the MM intervention in structure, duration, and frequency, while excluding explicit mindfulness techniques.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [11]Manuso testimony to the president’s commission on mental health, vol. 2, appendix. US government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA, 1978
  2. [13]British Occupational Health Research Foundation Workplace Interventions for People with Common Mental Health Problems: Evidence Review and Recommendations 2005 London, UK BOHRF
  3. [20]Bruning NS Frew DR Can stress intervention strategies improve self-esteem, manifest anxiety, and job satisfaction? A longitudinal field experiment Journal of Health and Human Resources Administration 1986 9 1 110 124
  4. [28]Benson H Beary JF Carol MP The relaxation response Psychiatry 1974 37 37 46 4810622
  5. [30]Osipow SH Occupational Stress Inventory: Revised Edition (OSI-R): Professional Manual 1984 Odessa, Fla, USA Psychological Assessment Resources
  6. [35]Taylor AW Wilson DH Dal Grande E Mental health status of the South Australian population Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2000 24 1 29 34 10777975
  7. [39]Manocha R Black D Ryan J Stough C Spiro D Changing definitions of meditation: physiological corollorary Journal of the International Society of Life Sciences 2010 28 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Manocha, R., Black, D., Sarris, J., & Stough, C.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Manocha, R.
Venue
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
2011
Issue
1
Pages
960583-960583
ISSN
  • 1741-427X (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-4288
OpenAlex
W1993449216
Cited by
101
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (cc-by)
Funders
Australian National Health & Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
meditation, occupational stress, anxiety, depressive mood, Sahaja Yoga, relaxation, full-time employees, occupational health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review