Cited by 260Biosensors and Analytical DetectionSalivary Gland Disorders and FunctionsSARS-CoV-2 detection and testing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 156 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Saliva-Based Biosensors: Noninvasive Monitoring Tool for Clinical Diagnostics

Open access
Malon, Radha S. P., Sadir, Sahba, Balakrishnan, Malarvili, Córcoles, Emma P.·2014·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Saliva is increasingly recognised as an attractive diagnostic fluid. The presence of various disease signalling salivary biomarkers that accurately reflect normal and disease states in humans and the sampling benefits compared to blood sampling are some of the reasons for this recognition. This explains the burgeoning research field in assay developments and technological advancements for the detection of various salivary biomarkers to improve clinical diagnosis, management, and treatment. This paper reviews the significance of salivary biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and therapeutic applications, with focus on the technologies and biosensing platforms that have been reported for screening these biomarkers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2014/962903

Cites

156 of 156 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 157 references

1 of the 157 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 2009, The American Journal of Dentistry, 22, 241
  2. 2014, Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran, 25, 274
  3. 2014, Cukurova Medical Journal, 39, 7
  4. 2006, Medicina Oral Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 11, E309
  5. 2013, Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7, 3066
  6. 2010, Journal of Periodontology & Implant Dentistry, 2, 17
  7. 2010, Micronanoelectronic Technology, 12
  8. 2008, International Journal of Nanomedicine, 3, 211
  9. 1993, Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine, 4, 301
  10. 10.3858/BMBRep.2010.43.7.506 · DOI
  11. 2010, Testosterone and androgens in women
  12. 1984, The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 148, 441
  13. 2012, Endokrynologia Polska, 63, 183
  14. 2003, For the quantitative determination of progesterone by enzyme immunoassay in human saliva
  15. 2002, Annali Facoltà Di Medicina Veterinaria Di Parma, 23, 295
  16. 1992, European Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 30, 541
  17. 10.1016/j.snb.2008.03.018 · DOI
  18. 1996, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 91, 1145
  19. 1995, The American Journal of Gastroenterology, 90, 1820
  20. 1987, Clinical & Experimental Immunology, 70, 316
  21. 2004, Journal of the Egyptian Society of Parasitology, 34, 1095
  22. 2011, Salivary biomarkers for lung cancer detection
  23. 2000, Clinical Cancer Research, 6, 2363
  24. 2008, Molecular Medicine Reports, 1, 375
  25. 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine, 25, 101

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–258 of 258

Metadata

Authors
Malon, R. S. P., Sadir, S., Balakrishnan, M., & Córcoles, E. P.
Affiliations
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • Faculty of Biosciences and Medical Engineering (FBME), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Building VO1, Block A, Level 5, Room 27, 81310 Skudai, Johor, Malaysia
Corresponding author
Córcoles, Emma P.
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014
Volume
2014
Pages
1-20
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2153028986
Cited by
260
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (01H78)
  • Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia (01H78)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Salivary Gland Disorders and Functions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Keywords
salivary biomarkers, non-invasive diagnosis, diagnosis, biosensor platform, biomarker detection, therapeutic applications, saliva sampling
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Saliva, Salivary Gland Neoplasms, Biomarkers, Tumor, Biosensing Techniques, Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review