Cited by 93Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Opioid Use

Associations among Gender, Coping Patterns and Functioning for Individuals with Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review

Open access
El-Shormilisy, Nina, Strong, Jenny, Meredith, Pamela J·2015·Pain Research and Management

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Developing strategies for coping with chronic pain is an integral part of successfully living with this often debilitating health condition. While gender differences in pain coping strategies have long been investigated, the relationship between gender‐specific engagement in coping and associated functioning in individuals experiencing chronic pain is yet to be clearly understood. OBJECTIVE: The present systematic review focused on studies that address these relationships to critically evaluate the available evidence. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using MEDLINE via Ovid, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL, with 7247 titles retrieved. To be included, studies had to be in English, focus on adult participants, consider chronic nonmalignant pain, use measures of coping and functioning (or disability), report on gender‐specific outcomes (for coping and functioning [or disability]), and investigate a relationship among gender, coping and functioning. One researcher screened abstracts and full‐text articles, and extracted and tabulated data, while two researchers independently assessed potential articles for eligibility and methodological quality. RESULTS: Only seven studies met the inclusion criteria – six of high quality and one of moderate quality. The presented findings suggest that women in pain are more likely to use coping strategies considered to be maladaptive, resulting in poorer functioning, while men tend to engage in coping strategies considered to be adaptive, leading to better functional outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: While there is some evidence supporting gender‐specific engagement in coping and associated functioning, future research is necessary to expand understanding of these interrelations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/490610

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Experimental pain studies show that receiving social support during a pain task attenuates blood pressure, heart rate, and cortisol reactivity and is associated with lower pain intensity and unpleasantness and higher pain threshold.

    “experimental pain studies that demonstrate receiving social support during a pain task not only attenuates blood pressure, heart rate, and cortisol reactivity, but is also associated with reduced pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings and increased pain threshold 98–100.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
El-Shormilisy, N., Strong, J., & Meredith, P. J.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
El-Shormilisy, Nina
Venue
Pain Research and Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
48-55
ISSN
  • 1203-6765 (ISSN-L)
  • 1918-1523
OpenAlex
W1568878503
Cited by
93
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pain Research and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acquire (CQUniversity) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
chronic pain, gender differences, pain coping, maladaptive coping, functional outcome, disability, chronic non-cancer pain, women
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Sex Factors, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review