Cited by 98Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Placebo EffectPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Sex-specific effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain

Edwards, Robert, Augustson, Erik M., Fillingim, Roger·2000·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Considerable research indicates that both high levels of anxiety and female sex are associated with increased sensitivity to experimental pain and greater experience of clinical pain. In general, however, previous research has not investigated the joint effects of sex and anxiety on pain responses. A single previous laboratory-based study indicated that anxiety was inversely related to pain thresholds among men but not among women. The present study examined the relation between pain-related anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain in a sex-dependent manner. DESIGN AND SETTING: A total of 215 (114 women, 101 men) chronic pain patients referred to a multidisciplinary treatment center completed questionnaires assessing anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain. RESULTS: Results generally supported the previous laboratory-based finding indicating that an inverse relation between anxiety and adjustment to chronic pain was present only among male patients. Although male patients with high pain-related anxiety reported greater pain severity, greater interference of pain, and lower levels of daily activity than male patients with low anxiety, this effect was not present among female patients. Moreover, the effects of pain-related anxiety on adjustment to chronic pain were not attributable to either hypervigilance or use of passive coping strategies. Potential explanations and implications for the present findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200003000-00008

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The stress-buffering hypothesis holds that social support can buffer the negative health consequences of stressors.

    “According to the stress-buffering hypothesis, negative consequences of stressors on health outcomes can be buffered by social support 86.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edwards, R., Augustson, E. M., & Fillingim, R.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Corresponding author
  • Edwards, Robert
  • Fillingim, Roger
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2000-03
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
46-53
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312918940
Cited by
98
References
55
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain-related anxiety, chronic pain, sex differences, pain intensity, pain interference, daily activities, hypervigilance, multidisciplinary pain management
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Characteristics, Sickness Impact Profile

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review