The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Probiotic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifidobacteria in the Prevention and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Other Related Diseases: A Systematic Review of Randomized Human Clinical Trials
Open accessAbstract
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic inflammation of the small intestine and colon caused by a dysregulated immune response to host intestinal microbiota in genetically susceptible subjects. A number of fermented dairy products contain lactic acid bacteria (LAB) and bifidobacteria, some of which have been characterized as probiotics that can modify the gut microbiota and may be beneficial for the treatment and the prevention of IBD. The objective of this review was to carry out a systematic search of LAB and bifidobacteria probiotics and IBD, using the PubMed and Scopus databases, defined by a specific equation using MeSH terms and limited to human clinical trials. The use of probiotics and/or synbiotics has positive effects in the treatment and maintenance of UC, whereas in CD clear effectiveness has only been shown for synbiotics. Furthermore, in other associated IBD pathologies, such as pouchitis and cholangitis, LAB and bifidobacteria probiotics can provide a benefit through the improvement of clinical symptoms. However, more studies are needed to understand their mechanisms of action and in this way to understand the effect of probiotics prior to their use as coadjuvants in the therapy and prevention of IBD conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system
Kau, A. L., Ahern, P. P., Griffin, N. W., Goodman, A. L., & Gordon, J. I. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10213 · Cited by 2,588
Hou, J. K., Abraham, B., & El-Serag, H. (2011) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.44 · Cited by 1,009
Ramirez-Farias, C., Slezak, K., Fuller, Z., Duncan, A., Holtrop, G., & Louis, P. (2008) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114508019880 · Cited by 822
Tursi, A., Brandimarte, G., Papa, A., Giglio, A., Elisei, W., Giorgetti, G. M., Forti, G., Morini, S., Hassan, C., Pistoia, M. A., et al. (2010) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1038/ajg.2010.218 · Cited by 489
Bifidobacterium infantis35624 modulates host inflammatory processes beyond the gut
Groeger, D., O’Mahony, L., Murphy, E. F., Bourke, J. F., Dinan, T. G., Kiely, B., Shanahan, F., & Quigley, E. M. M. (2013) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.4161/gmic.25487 · Cited by 448 · cited 2×
“infantis 35624 (1 × 10(10) CFU) for six weeks to patients with mild- to moderate-active UC, during concurrent treatment with 5ASA, significantly reduced plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) levels versus the placebo-treated controls [66].”
BackgroundResultBenjamin, J. L., Hedin, C. R. H., Koutsoumpas, A., Ng, S. C., McCarthy, N. E., Hart, A. L., Kamm, M. A., Sanderson, J. D., Knight, S. C., Forbes, A., et al. (2011) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gut.2010.232025 · Cited by 361
Sources, isolation, characterisation and evaluation of probiotics
Fontana, L., Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Diaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., & Gil, A. (2013) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512004011 · Cited by 348
Ishikawa, H., Matsumoto, S., Ohashi, Y., Imaoka, A., Setoyama, H., Umesaki, Y., Tanaka, R., & Otani, T. (2011) · Digestion · doi:10.1159/000322977 · Cited by 197 · cited 1×
“Moreover, fecal pH was significantly lower after the synbiotic treatment [73].”
BackgroundProbiotics in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a randomized placebo-controlled crossover pilot study
Vleggaar, F. P., Monkelbaan, J. F., & van Erpecum, K. J. (2008) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0b013e3282f5197e · Cited by 110
Cited by
Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health
Valdes, A. M., Walter, J., Segal, E., & Spector, T. D. (2018) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.k2179 · Cited by 2,375
Mechanisms of action of probiotics
Plaza-Diaz, J., Ruiz-Ojeda, F. J., Gil-Campos, M., & Gil, A. (2019) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmy063 · Cited by 1,423
Self-citationThe gut microbiota in anxiety and depression—A systematic review
Simpson, C. A., Diaz-Arteche, C., Eliby, D., Schwartz, O. S., Simmons, J. G., & Cowan, C. S. M. (2021) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101943 · Cited by 912
Probiotic species in the modulation of gut microbiota: An overview
Azad, M. A. K., Sarker, M., Li, T., & Yin, J. (2018) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2018/9478630 · Cited by 803
Health benefits of fermented foods
Şanlier, N., Gökcen, B. B., & Sezgin, A. C. (2019) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408398.2017.1383355 · Cited by 789
Metadata
- Authors
- Saez-Lara, M. J., Gomez-Llorente, C., Plaza-Diaz, J., & Gil, A.
- Venue
- BioMed Research International
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 2015
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
- 2314-6133
- 2314-6141
- OpenAlex
- W2043666422
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 7.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
