Cited by 261Vitamin D Research StudiesNutrition and Health in AgingBone health and osteoporosis research

Vitamin D: A Review on Its Effects on Muscle Strength, the Risk of Fall, and Frailty

Open access
Halfon, Matthieu, Phan, Olivier, Teta, Daniel·2015·BioMed Research International

Abstract

Vitamin D is the main hormone of bone metabolism. However, the ubiquitary nature of vitamin D receptor (VDR) suggests potential for widespread effects, which has led to new research exploring the effects of vitamin D on a variety of tissues, especially in the skeletal muscle.In vitro studies have shown that the active form of vitamin D, calcitriol, acts in myocytes through genomic effects involving VDR activation in the cell nucleus to drive cellular differentiation and proliferation. A putative transmembrane receptor may be responsible for nongenomic effects leading to rapid influx of calcium within muscle cells. Hypovitaminosis D is consistently associated with decrease in muscle function and performance and increase in disability. On the contrary, vitamin D supplementation has been shown to improve muscle strength and gait in different settings, especially in elderly patients. Despite some controversies in the interpretation of meta-analysis, a reduced risk of falls has been attributed to vitamin D supplementation due to direct effects on muscle cells. Finally, a low vitamin D status is consistently associated with the frail phenotype. This is why many authorities recommend vitamin D supplementation in the frail patient.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1155/2015/953241

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis reported a modest positive effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength in elderly individuals with deficiency, but no effect on muscle mass, nor on muscle preservation during caloric restriction.

    “A meta-analysis reported a modest positive effect of vitamin D supplementation on muscle strength in elderly individuals with deficiency, but no effect on muscle mass, nor on muscle preservation during caloric restriction [57, 58].”

    From Muscle loss and GLP-1R agonists use (2025) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Emerging data suggest that vitamin D supplementation aimed at achieving serum concentrations above the reference value may augment increases in skeletal muscle mass, function, decrease recovery time from exercise, and increase both power and force production in older adults.

    “In addition to restoring deficient levels, data are also emerging to suggest that vitamin D supplementation aimed at achieving serum concentrations above the reference value may augment increases in skeletal muscle mass, function, decrease recovery time from exercise, and increase both power and force production in older adults [284,297,298].”

    From Nutritional Considerations for the Vegan Athlete (2023) · cites this paper as [297]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Halfon, M., Phan, O., & Teta, D.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Halfon, Matthieu
Venue
BioMed Research International
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015
Volume
2015
Pages
1-11
ISSN
  • 1110-7243 (ISSN-L)
  • 2314-6133
  • 2314-6141
OpenAlex
W2064785632
Cited by
261
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 6
FWCI
4.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BioMed Research International (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
Keywords
vitamin D, muscle strength, fall risk, frailty, vitamin D receptor, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3, vitamin D deficiency, vitamin D supplementation, gait, older adults, skeletal muscle, bone metabolism
MeSH terms
Accidental Falls, Aged, Cell Differentiation, Humans, Vitamin D, Frail Elderly, Receptors, Calcitriol, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Cells, Cell Proliferation, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review