Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 475

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Notch Signaling Determines the M1 versus M2 Polarization of Macrophages in Antitumor Immune Responses

Wang, Yao-Chun, He, Fei, Feng, Fan, Liu, Xiao-Wei, Dong, Guang-Ying, Qin, Hong-Yan, Hu, Xing-Bin, Zheng, Min-Hua, Liang, Liang, Feng, Lei, Liang, Ying-Min, Han, Hua·2010·Cancer Research

Abstract

Macrophages are important tumor-infiltrating cells and play pivotal roles in tumor growth and metastasis. Macrophages participate in immune responses to tumors in a polarized manner: classic M1 macrophages produce interleukin (IL) 12 to promote tumoricidal responses, whereas M2 macrophages produce IL10 and help tumor progression. The mechanisms governing macrophage polarization are unclear. Here, we show that the M2-like tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) have a lower level of Notch pathway activation in mouse tumor models. Forced activation of Notch signaling increased M1 macrophages which produce IL12, no matter whether M1 or M2 inducers were applied. When Notch signaling was blocked, the M1 inducers induced M2 response in the expense of M1. Macrophages deficient in canonical Notch signaling showed TAM phenotypes. Forced activation of Notch signaling in macrophages enhanced their antitumor capacity. We further show that RBP-J–mediated Notch signaling regulates the M1 versus M2 polarization through SOCS3. Therefore, Notch signaling plays critical roles in the determination of M1 versus M2 polarization of macrophages, and compromised Notch pathway activation will lead to the M2-like TAMs. These results provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of macrophage polarization and shed light on new therapies for cancers through the modulation of macrophage polarization through the Notch signaling. Cancer Res; 70(12); 4840–9. ©2010 AACR.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0269

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 475

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y.-C., He, F., Feng, F., Liu, X.-W., Dong, G.-Y., Qin, H.-Y., Hu, X.-B., Zheng, M.-H., Liang, L., Feng, L., Liang, Y.-M., & Han, H.
Venue
Cancer Research
Published
2010-06-14
Volume
70
Issue
12
Pages
4840-4849
ISSN
  • 0008-5472 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-7445
OpenAlex
W2103412440
Cited by
475
References
11
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Notch Signaling Determines the M1 versus M2 Polarization of Macrophages in Antitumor Immune Responses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0269
The paper
Wang, Y.-C., He, F., Feng, F., Liu, X.-W., Dong, G.-Y., Qin, H.-Y., Hu, X.-B., Zheng, M.-H., Liang, L., Feng, L., Liang, Y.-M., & Han, H. (2010). Notch Signaling Determines the M1 versus M2 Polarization of Macrophages in Antitumor Immune Responses. Cancer Research. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-10-0269

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.