Cited by 382Melanoma and MAPK PathwaysThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Relief of Feedback Inhibition of HER3 Transcription by RAF and MEK Inhibitors Attenuates Their Antitumor Effects in BRAF -Mutant Thyroid Carcinomas

Open access
Montero-Conde, Cristina, Ruiz-Llorente, Sergio, Dominguez, Jose M., Knauf, Jeffrey A., Viale, Agnes, Sherman, Eric J., Ryder, Mabel, Ghossein, Ronald A. +2 more·2013·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The RAF inhibitor vemurafenib (PLX4032) increases survival in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma, but has limited efficacy in patients with colorectal cancers. Thyroid cancer cells are also comparatively refractory to RAF inhibitors. In contrast to melanomas, inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling by PLX4032 is transient in thyroid and colorectal cancer cells. The rebound in extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in thyroid cells is accompanied by increased HER3 signaling caused by induction of ERBB3 (HER3) transcription through decreased promoter occupancy by the transcriptional repressors C-terminal binding protein 1 and 2 and by autocrine secretion of neuregulin-1 (NRG1). The HER kinase inhibitor lapatinib prevents MAPK rebound and sensitizes BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cells to RAF or MAP-ERK kinase inhibitors. This provides a rationale for combining ERK pathway antagonists with inhibitors of feedback-reactivated HER signaling in this disease. The determinants of primary resistance to MAPK inhibitors vary between cancer types, due to preferential upregulation of specific receptor tyrosine kinases, and the abundance of their respective ligands. Significance: Thyroid cancer cell lines with mutant BRAF are resistant to PLX4032. RAF inhibitors transiently inhibit the ERK pathway and de-repress HER3 transcription. In the context of constitutive NRG1 secretion, this results in an ERK and AKT rebound that diminishes the antitumor effects of RAF inhibitors, which is overcome by combination with lapatinib. Cancer Discov; 3(5); 520–33. ©2013 AACR. See related commentary by Girotti and Marais, p. 487 This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 471

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0531

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HER family and FGFR signaling are key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors.

    “This finding is consistent with prior studies identifying HER family and FGFR signaling as key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors (10–14,21,22) and recent functional genomic screens(40).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) identify HER2/HER3 signaling as a mediator of rebound signaling and reduced response to RAF or MEK inhibitors in BRAF-mutant thyroid cancer cells. Our copy does not identify FGFR signaling as a mediator; searches for “FGFR” and “fibroblast growth factor” found no supporting passage. The paper also emphasizes that the relevant reactivated receptors vary by cell type. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600 mutant cancers causes RTK-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling through wild type RAS and RAF, particularly in colorectal cancer.

    “BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600 mutant cancers leads to loss of negative feedback signals regulated by the MAPK pathway, leading to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling through wild type RAS and RAF, particularly in specific tumor types, such as colorectal cancer (9–12).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [10]

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Determinants of primary resistance differ among tumor types that up-regulate various RTKs or ligands in response to pathway inhibition.

    “Determinants of primary resistance are not the same in different tumor types that up-regulate various RTKs or their ligands in response to pathway inhibition (111-113).”

    From Targeting CDK4 and CDK6: From Discovery to Therapy (2016) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [31]Prahallad A Sun C Huang S Di NF Salazar R Zecchin D Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR Nature 2012 483 100 3 22281684

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montero-Conde, C., Ruiz-Llorente, S., Dominguez, J. M., Knauf, J. A., Viale, A., Sherman, E. J., Ryder, M., Ghossein, R. A., Rosen, N., & Fagin, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, 2Sloan Kettering Institute, Departments of 3Medicine and 4Pathology, and 5Molecular Pharmacology and Chemistry Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Corresponding author
Fagin, James A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2013-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
5
Pages
520-533
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2141787711
Cited by
382
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 22
FWCI
21.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • AstraZeneca
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Plexxikon
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ca072598-05)
  • Chugai Pharmaceutical
  • National Cancer Institute (CA72598, CA 50706, R01CA050706, R01CA072597, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
vemurafenib, RAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, product inhibition, MAPK signaling, neuregulin-1, lapatinib, Akt signaling, drug resistance, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Humans, Neoplasms, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review