Cited by 1,022Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

EGFR-Mediated Reactivation of MAPK Signaling Contributes to Insensitivity of BRAF -Mutant Colorectal Cancers to RAF Inhibition with Vemurafenib

Open access
Corcoran, Ryan B., Ebi, Hiromichi, Turke, Alexa B., Coffee, Erin M., Nishino, Michiya, Cogdill, Alexandria P., Brown, Ronald D., Della Pelle, Patricia +8 more·2012·Cancer Discovery

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

BRAF mutations occur in 10% to 15% of colorectal cancers and confer adverse outcome in the metastatic setting. Although RAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib (PLX4032) have proven effective in the treatment of BRAF-mutant melanoma, they are surprisingly ineffective in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers, and the reason for this disparity remains unclear. Compared with BRAF-mutant melanoma cells, BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells were less sensitive to vemurafenib, and phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (P-ERK) suppression was not sustained in response to treatment. Although transient inhibition of P-ERK by vemurafenib was observed in colorectal cancer, rapid ERK reactivation occurred through epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated activation of RAS and CRAF. BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers expressed greater levels of phospho-EGFR than BRAF-mutant melanomas, suggesting that colorectal cancers are specifically poised for EGFR-mediated resistance. Combined RAF and EGFR inhibition blocked reactivation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells and markedly improved efficacy in vitro and in vivo. These findings support the evaluation of combined RAF and EGFR inhibition in patients with BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Significance: BRAF valine 600 (V600) mutations occur in 10% to 15% of colorectal cancers, yet these tumors show a surprisingly low clinical response rate (∼5%) to selective RAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib, which have produced dramatic response rates (60%–80%) in melanomas harboring the identical BRAF V600 mutation. We found that EGFR-mediated MAPK pathway reactivation leads to resistance to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers and that combined RAF and EGFR inhibition can lead to sustained MAPK pathway suppression and improved efficacy in vitro and in tumor xenografts. Cancer Discovery; 2(3); 227–35. ©2012 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 193

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-11-0341

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BRAFi (PLX4032 or vemurafenib) induces rapid feedback activation of EGFR in BRAF V600E-mutated CRC cell lines, supporting continued proliferation in the presence of BRAF inhibition.

    “For example, BRAFi (PLX4032 or vermurafenib) induces a rapid, marked feedback activation of EGFR in the BRAF (V600E)-mutated CRC cell lines, supporting continued proliferation in the presence of BRAF inhibition [9, 11].”

    From An integrative gene expression signature analysis identifies CMS4 KRAS-mutated colorectal cancers sensitive to combined MEK and SRC targeted therapy (2022) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results and Discussion explicitly say that vemurafenib did not increase EGFR activation: phospho-EGFR did not rise from 0 to 48 hours. The paper instead reports rapid reactivation of downstream MAPK signaling mediated by EGFR that was already active before treatment. Thus it supports the resistance mechanism, but contradicts the claim that treatment rapidly activates EGFR itself. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600 mutant cancers causes RTK-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling through wild type RAS and RAF, particularly in colorectal cancer.

    “BRAF inhibition in BRAFV600 mutant cancers leads to loss of negative feedback signals regulated by the MAPK pathway, leading to receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling through wild type RAS and RAF, particularly in specific tumor types, such as colorectal cancer (9–12).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) support EGFR-mediated reactivation of RAS, CRAF and MAPK signaling after vemurafenib treatment in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. The citing sentence also presents loss of MAPK-regulated negative feedback as the cause; the Discussion offers that mechanism as a possibility and says further study is needed to establish it. The paper does not explicitly establish that the RAS and RAF involved are wild type. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HER family and FGFR signaling are key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors.

    “This finding is consistent with prior studies identifying HER family and FGFR signaling as key mediators of adaptive feedback to RAS-MAPK pathway inhibitors (10–14,21,22) and recent functional genomic screens(40).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results (page not provided) identify EGFR, a HER-family receptor, as the predominant mediator of MAPK reactivation after RAF inhibition in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer cells. The Discussion (page not provided) describes a possible feedback mechanism but says it remains unproven. Our copy does not establish FGFR signaling as a mediator, so it supports only the EGFR portion of the broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adaptive feedback resistance has been a key limitation in prior clinical efforts to target the RAS-MAPK pathway.

    “However, adaptive feedback resistance has been a key limitation in prior clinical efforts to target the RAS-MAPK pathway.”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links the poor response of BRAF-mutant colorectal cancers to vemurafenib with EGFR-mediated reactivation of MAPK signaling, supporting feedback resistance as a limitation in that setting. The paper does not establish that it was a key limitation across prior clinical efforts to target the RAS–MAPK pathway more broadly; its mechanistic evidence comes from cell and xenograft studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • RTK-driven feedback reactivation of RAS-MAPK signaling has been identified as a key driver of resistance in BRAFV600E cancers treated with BRAF inhibitors (colorectal cancer in particular) and in KRAS-mutant cancers treated with MEK inhibitors.

    “For example, RTK-driven feedback reactivation of RAS-MAPK signaling has been identified as a key driver of resistance in BRAFV600E cancers treated with BRAF inhibitors (colorectal cancer in particular) and in KRAS-mutant cancers treated with MEK inhibitors (11,12,32).”

    From Vertical Pathway Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive Feedback Resistance to KRASG12C Inhibition (2020) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Results and Discussion (page not provided) identify EGFR-driven RAS–MAPK reactivation as a mechanism of reduced sensitivity to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant colorectal cancer. Our copy does not support the separate claim about RTK-driven resistance to MEK inhibitors in KRAS-mutant cancers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corcoran, R. B., Ebi, H., Turke, A. B., Coffee, E. M., Nishino, M., Cogdill, A. P., Brown, R. D., Della Pelle, P., Dias-Santagata, D., Hung, K. E., Flaherty, K. T., Piris, A., Wargo, J. A., Settleman, J., Mino-Kenudson, M., & Engelman, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Tufts Medical Center (US)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, 2Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 3Division of Gastro-enterology, Tufts Medical Center, and Departments of 4Pathology and 5Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; and 6Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California
Corresponding author
Engelman, Jeffrey A.
Venue
Cancer Discovery
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
227-235
ISSN
  • 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
  • 2159-8290
OpenAlex
W2110682589
Cited by
1,022
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 88 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 66 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 86 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 25
FWCI
39.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (P50CA127003, R01CA166480, U01CA141457, R01CA140594, P50CA090578, K08CA120060, R01CA137008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Melanoma and MAPK Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
BRAF V600 mutation, colorectal cancer, vemurafenib, RAF inhibitors, EGFR, MAPK signaling, drug resistance, Raf-1, Ras, combination therapy, BRAF-mutant melanoma
MeSH terms
Vemurafenib, Animals, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Indoles, Male, Mice, Nude, Sulfonamides, Colorectal Neoplasms, HT29 Cells, MAP Kinase Signaling System, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, Cell Line, Tumor, raf Kinases, Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf, Cell Growth Processes, Mice, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review