Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 184

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Executive Function in Patients with Remitted Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia and Its Relationship with Functional Outcome

Martínez-Arán, A., Penadés, R., Vieta, E., Colom, F., Reinares, M., Benabarre, A., Salamero, M., Gastó, C.·2002·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have reported that differences in cognitive performance between schizophrenic and bipolar patients seem to be smaller than expected. Patients with schizophrenia have consistently shown frontal executive dysfunctions, but studies regarding executive abilities in bipolar patients are scarce and discrepant. As executive function has been associated with psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia, we wanted to investigate if such a relationship is also present in bipolar disorder and the differences between the two groups. Methods: Executive function was assessed in 49 euthymic (at least 6 months in remission, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale ≤8 and Young Mania Rating Scale ≤6) bipolar and in 49 schizophrenic, residual-type (with at least 1 year without acute exacerbation and predominant negative symptomatology) patients, by the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), FAS Test (COWAT) and Trail Making Test. Baseline clinical and psychosocial variables were controlled and psychopathology evaluated by means of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Results: The two groups showed a similar pattern of cognitive deficits in tests of executive function, except for the number of categories achieved in the WCST, which was significantly lower in the schizophrenic group (F = 7.26; p = 0.009). Functional outcome was predicted by the negative syndrome (PANSSN) and perseverative errors (WCST) in schizophrenic patients, and general psychopathology (PANSSG) was the best predictor of functional outcome in the bipolar group. Conclusion: Executive function was a good predictor of functional outcome in the schizophrenic group, whereas clinical variables were more predictive of the bipolar one. Patterns of cognitive disturbances in tasks of executive function are similar in both groups but quantitatively more marked in schizophrenia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000049342

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 184

Metadata

Authors
Martínez-Arán, A., Penadés, R., Vieta, E., Colom, F., Reinares, M., Benabarre, A., Salamero, M., & Gastó, C.
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2001-12-07
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
39-46
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2036598910
Cited by
184
References
10
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Executive Function in Patients with Remitted Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia and Its Relationship with Functional Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1159/000049342
The paper
Martínez-Arán, A., Penadés, R., Vieta, E., Colom, F., Reinares, M., Benabarre, A., Salamero, M., & Gastó, C. (2002). Executive Function in Patients with Remitted Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia and Its Relationship with Functional Outcome. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049342

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.