Cited by 14Gastrointestinal motility and disordersVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates gastric vagal activity and motor function without increasing cardiac vagal activity

Hjelland, Ina Elen, Oveland, Nils Petter, Leversen, Katrine, Berstad, Arnold, Hausken, Trygve·2005·Digestion

Abstract

Background/Aims: We investigated whether increasing the efferent vagal activity by insulin-induced hypoglycemia would enhance gastric emptying and volumes in healthy subjects. Methods: Twenty healthy volunteers (10 males) were examined with and without vagal stimulation by insulin-induced hypoglycemia using a glucose clamp technique. Stomach function was tested by drinking meat soup (0.04 kcal ml–1) at a rate of 100 ml min–1 until maximal capacity. Intragastric volume at maximal drinking capacity was determined by three-dimensional ultrasound. Respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) was used as an index of cardiac vagal activity and plasma pancreatic polypeptide (PP) as a measure of gastric vagal activity, and skin conductance (SC) as a measure of sympathetic tone. Results: Insulin-induced hypoglycaemia increased drinking capacity (p = 0.002), gastric emptying (p = 0.02), PP (p = 0.004) and SC (p = 0.004), while intragastric volume was unchanged (p = 0.7) and RSA decreased (p = 0.03). Conclusion: Enhancement of gastric vagal activity by insulin-induced hypoglycemia increased drinking capacity and gastric emptying similarly, resulting in an unchanged intragastric volume. Enhanced efferent vagal activity to the stomach (as measured by PP) was not associated by enhanced cardiac vagal activity (as measured by RSA), possibly a consequence of stress-induced sympathetic activation during the procedure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000087600

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hjelland, I. E., Oveland, N. P., Leversen, K., Berstad, A., & Hausken, T.
Affiliations
Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
Venue
Digestion
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2005
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
43-48
ISSN
  • 0012-2823 (ISSN-L)
  • 1421-9867
OpenAlex
W2154347884
Cited by
14
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Digestion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
insulin-induced hypoglycemia, gastric emptying, gastric motility, cardiac vagal activity, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, pancreatic polypeptide, sympathetic activation, stress response
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Stomach, Vagus Nerve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review