CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 409Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyWorkplace Spirituality and LeadershipReligion and Society Interactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Religiosity/Spirituality and Mortality

Chida, Yoichi, Steptoe, Andrew, Powell, Lynda H.·2009·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
DOI 10.1159/000190791
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: The relationship between religiosity/spirituality and physical health has been the subject of growing interest in epidemiological research. We systematically reviewed prospective observational cohort studies of the association between this potentially protective psychological factor and mortality using meta-analytic methods. Methods: We searched general bibliographic databases: Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science and PubMed (up to 20 March, 2008). Two reviewers independently extracted data on study characteristics, quality, and estimates of associations. Random effects meta-analyses, subgrouping, and sensitivity analysis were performed. Results: There were 69 studies (28 articles) and 22 studies (11 articles) investigating the association between religiosity/spirituality and mortality in initially healthy populations and diseased populations, respectively. The results of the meta-analyses showed that religiosity/spirituality was associated with reduced mortality in healthy population studies (combined hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.76–0.87, p <0.001), but not in diseased population studies (combined hazard ratio = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.94–1.01, p = 0.19). Notably, the protective effect of religiosity/spirituality in the initially healthy population studies was independent of behavioral factors (smoking, drinking, exercising, and socioeconomic status), negative affect, and social support. We divided studies according to the aspects of religiosity/spirituality measure examined, and found that organizational activity (e.g. church attendance) was associated with greater survival in healthy population studies. Multi-dimensional aspects were related to survival in both the healthy and diseased populations. Religiosity/spirituality was negatively associated with cardiovascular mortality in healthy population studies. Conclusions: The current review suggests that religiosity/spirituality has a favorable effect on survival, although the presence of publication biases indicates that results should be interpreted with caution.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000190791

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 88 references

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037%2F0003-066X.58.1.36 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1159%2F000085535 · DOI
  3. 10.1037%2F0882-7974.13.2.242 · DOI
  4. 10.1001%2Farchinte.161.15.1881 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1023%2FA%3A1022904915837 · DOI
  6. 10.1207%2FS15324796ABM2301_10 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 408

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Chida, Y., Steptoe, A., & Powell, L. H.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Rush University Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2009
Volume
78
Issue
2
Pages
81-90
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
DOI
10.1159/000190791
OpenAlex
W2019612427
Cited by
409
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
Keywords
religiosity, spirituality, mortality, survival, church attendance, cardiovascular mortality, healthy population, publication bias
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Psychophysiology, Religion, Meditation, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review