Cited by 94

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Persistent Loss of Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Increased Cell Death following Adolescent, but Not Adult, Chronic Ethanol Exposure

Broadwater, Margaret A., Liu, Wen, Crews, Fulton T., Spear, Linda P.·2014·Developmental Neuroscience

Abstract

Although adolescence is a common age to initiate alcohol consumption, the long-term consequences of exposure to alcohol at this time of considerable brain maturation are largely unknown. In studies utilizing rodents, behavioral evidence is beginning to emerge suggesting that the hippocampus may be persistently affected by repeated ethanol exposure during adolescence, but not by comparable alcohol exposure in adulthood. The purpose of this series of experiments was to explore a potential mechanism of hippocampal dysfunction in adults exposed to ethanol during adolescence. Given that disruption in adult neurogenesis has been reported to impair performance on tasks thought to be hippocampally related, we used immunohistochemistry to assess levels of doublecortin (DCX), an endogenous marker of immature neurons, in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus 3-4 weeks after adolescent (postnatal day, PD28-48) or adult (PD70-90) intermittent ethanol exposure to 4 g/kg ethanol administered intragastrically. We also investigated another neurogenic niche, the subventricular zone (SVZ), to determine if the effects of ethanol exposure were region specific. Levels of cell proliferation and cell death were also examined in the DG via assessing Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 immunoreactivity, respectively. Significantly less DCX was observed in the DG of adolescent (but not adult) ethanol-exposed animals about 4 weeks after exposure when these animals were compared to control age-mates. The effects of adolescent ethanol on DCX immunoreactivity were specific to the hippocampus, with no significant exposure effects emerging in the SVZ. In both the DG and the SVZ there was a significant age-related decline in neurogenesis as indexed by DCX. The persistent effect of adolescent ethanol exposure on reduced DCX in the DG appears to be related to significant increases in cell death, with significantly more cleaved caspase-3-positive immunoreactivity observed in the adolescent ethanol group compared to controls, but no alterations in cell proliferation when indexed by Ki67. These results suggest that a history of adolescent ethanol exposure results in lowered levels of differentiating neurons, probably due at least in part to increased cell death of immature neurons. These effects were evident in adulthood, weeks following termination of the chronic exposure, and may contribute to previously reported behavioral deficits on hippocampal-related tasks after chronic ethanol exposure in adolescence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000362874

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03668.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1097/01.alc.0000175012.77756.d9 · DOI
  3. 10.1152/jn.00101.2007 · DOI
  4. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.737 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.013 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00121-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0735-7044.107.6.1093 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1006/nlme.1996.3752 · DOI
  9. 10.1097/01.alc.0000147657.51745.a7 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.054 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0607207103 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1768-09.2009 · DOI
  13. 10.1002/hipo.20163 · DOI
  14. 10.1515/RNS.2011.027 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/hipo.20153 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.058 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/cne.10874 · DOI
  18. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182:3<311::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1186/1742-4682-5-26 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2004.04.005 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.009 · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01214.x · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.009 · DOI
  25. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-04.2004 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/S1461145710000246 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/adb.12075 · DOI
  28. 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03123.x · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80778-3 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.016 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/cercor/13.6.620 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.011 · DOI
  33. 10.1002/hipo.20665 · DOI
  34. 10.1002/cne.22647 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.11.001 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.09.031 · DOI
  37. 10.1038/6365 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0204-04.2004 · DOI
  39. 10.1111/acer.12125 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 94

Metadata

Authors
Broadwater, M. A., Liu, W., Crews, F. T., & Spear, L. P.
Venue
Developmental Neuroscience
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2014
Volume
36
Issue
3-4
Pages
297-305
ISSN
  • 0378-5866
  • 1421-9859
Cited by
94
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review