The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Persistent Loss of Hippocampal Neurogenesis and Increased Cell Death following Adolescent, but Not Adult, Chronic Ethanol Exposure
Abstract
Although adolescence is a common age to initiate alcohol consumption, the long-term consequences of exposure to alcohol at this time of considerable brain maturation are largely unknown. In studies utilizing rodents, behavioral evidence is beginning to emerge suggesting that the hippocampus may be persistently affected by repeated ethanol exposure during adolescence, but not by comparable alcohol exposure in adulthood. The purpose of this series of experiments was to explore a potential mechanism of hippocampal dysfunction in adults exposed to ethanol during adolescence. Given that disruption in adult neurogenesis has been reported to impair performance on tasks thought to be hippocampally related, we used immunohistochemistry to assess levels of doublecortin (DCX), an endogenous marker of immature neurons, in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus 3-4 weeks after adolescent (postnatal day, PD28-48) or adult (PD70-90) intermittent ethanol exposure to 4 g/kg ethanol administered intragastrically. We also investigated another neurogenic niche, the subventricular zone (SVZ), to determine if the effects of ethanol exposure were region specific. Levels of cell proliferation and cell death were also examined in the DG via assessing Ki67 and cleaved caspase-3 immunoreactivity, respectively. Significantly less DCX was observed in the DG of adolescent (but not adult) ethanol-exposed animals about 4 weeks after exposure when these animals were compared to control age-mates. The effects of adolescent ethanol on DCX immunoreactivity were specific to the hippocampus, with no significant exposure effects emerging in the SVZ. In both the DG and the SVZ there was a significant age-related decline in neurogenesis as indexed by DCX. The persistent effect of adolescent ethanol exposure on reduced DCX in the DG appears to be related to significant increases in cell death, with significantly more cleaved caspase-3-positive immunoreactivity observed in the adolescent ethanol group compared to controls, but no alterations in cell proliferation when indexed by Ki67. These results suggest that a history of adolescent ethanol exposure results in lowered levels of differentiating neurons, probably due at least in part to increased cell death of immature neurons. These effects were evident in adulthood, weeks following termination of the chronic exposure, and may contribute to previously reported behavioral deficits on hippocampal-related tasks after chronic ethanol exposure in adolescence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“That is adolescent animals displayed reduced neurogenesis, 26 d after exposure where adult exposed animals did not.”
From The long-term cognitive consequences of adolescent exposure to recreational drugs of abuse (2018) · cites this paper as Broadwater et al. 2014
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neurogenesis in adolescent brain is potently inhibited by ethanol
Crews, F. T., Mdzinarishvili, A., Kim, D., He, J., & Nixon, K. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.090 · Cited by 265
Self-citationAge‐Dependent Inhibition of Long‐Term Potentiation by Ethanol in Immature Versus Mature Hippocampus
Swartzwelder, H. S., Wilson, W. A., & Tayyeb, M. I. (1995) · Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1111/j.1530-0277.1995.tb01011.x · Cited by 196
Vetreno, R. P., & Crews, F. T. (2012) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.08.046 · Cited by 183
Self-citationThe effects of running and of inhibiting adult neurogenesis on learning and memory in rats.
Wojtowicz, J. M., Askew, M. L., & Winocur, G. (2008) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06128.x · Cited by 158 · cited 2×
“Given that neurogenesis is implicated in context fear retention [11, 12, 13, 14, 15], it is possible that alterations in neurogenesis in the DG as a result of adolescent ethanol exposure may have contributed to deficits in context fear retention previously observed in a separate group of animals [6].”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1111/j.1530-0277.1998.tb03668.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/01.alc.0000175012.77756.d9 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00101.2007 · DOI
- 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.5.737 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.08.013 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00121-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0735-7044.107.6.1093 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1006/nlme.1996.3752 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.alc.0000147657.51745.a7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.11.054 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0607207103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1768-09.2009 · DOI
- 10.1002/hipo.20163 · DOI
- 10.1515/RNS.2011.027 · DOI
- 10.1002/hipo.20153 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.03.058 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.10874 · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200003)182:3<311::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-9 · DOI
- 10.1186/1742-4682-5-26 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.alcohol.2004.04.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pbb.2006.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01214.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.nbd.2008.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3063-04.2004 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1461145710000246 · DOI
- 10.1111/adb.12075 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.0953-816X.2003.03123.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80778-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.016 · DOI
- 10.1093/cercor/13.6.620 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2010.04.011 · DOI
- 10.1002/hipo.20665 · DOI
- 10.1002/cne.22647 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.alcohol.2009.11.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.09.031 · DOI
- 10.1038/6365 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0204-04.2004 · DOI
- 10.1111/acer.12125 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Effect of alcohol use on the adolescent brain and behavior
Lees, B., Meredith, L. R., Kirkland, A. E., Bryant, B. E., & Squeglia, L. M. (2020) · Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172906 · Cited by 411
The long-term cognitive consequences of adolescent exposure to recreational drugs of abuse
Mooney-Leber, S. M., & Gould, T. J. (2018) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.046672.117 · Cited by 140
“However, findings from Broadwater et al. (2014) indicate that age-related changes in neurogenesis and cell death differ in the duration of the effect.”
BackgroundResultSakharkar, A. J., Vetreno, R. P., Zhang, H., Kokare, D. M., Crews, F. T., & Pandey, S. C. (2016) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-016-1196-y · Cited by 122
Self-citationSeemiller, L. R., & Gould, T. J. (2020) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107234 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadwater, M. A., Liu, W., Crews, F. T., & Spear, L. P.
- Venue
- Developmental Neuroscience
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 297-305
- ISSN
- 0378-5866
- 1421-9859
- PMC
- PMC4125431
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review