Cited by 1,020Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Ablation of hippocampal neurogenesis impairs contextual fear conditioning and synaptic plasticity in the dentate gyrus

Open access
Saxe, Michael D., Battaglia, Fortunato, Wang, Jing-Wen, Malleret, Gael, David, Denis J., Monckton, James E., Garcia, A. Denise R., Sofroniew, Michael V. +4 more·2006·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Although hippocampal neurogenesis has been described in many adult mammals, the functional impact of this process on physiology and behavior remains unclear. In the present study, we used two independent methods to ablate hippocampal neurogenesis and found that each procedure caused a limited behavioral deficit and a loss of synaptic plasticity within the dentate gyrus. Specifically, focal X irradiation of the hippocampus or genetic ablation of glial fibrillary acidic protein-positive neural progenitor cells impaired contextual fear conditioning but not cued conditioning. Hippocampal-dependent spatial learning tasks such as the Morris water maze and Y maze were unaffected. These findings show that adult-born neurons make a distinct contribution to some but not all hippocampal functions. In a parallel set of experiments, we show that long-term potentiation elicited in the dentate gyrus in the absence of GABA blockers requires the presence of new neurons, as it is eliminated by each of our ablation procedures. These data show that new hippocampal neurons can be preferentially recruited over mature granule cells in vitro and may provide a framework for how this small cell population can influence behavior.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0607207103

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Contradictory studies have found either no effect of reduced neurogenesis on hippocampal cognition or only on certain types of hippocampal cognitive tests, and one study found that absence of new neurons improves cognitive function.

    “On the other hand, contradictory studies have found either no effect of reduced neurogenesis on hippocampal cognition (Groves et al., 2013; Saxe et al., 2006; Shors et al., 2002) or only on certain types of hippocampal cognitive tests (Shors et al., 2002). One study has even found that the absence of new neurons improves cognitive function (Saxe et al., 2007).”

    From Adult neurogenesis, glia, and the extracellular matrix (2019) · cites this paper as Saxe et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saxe, M. D., Battaglia, F., Wang, J.-W., Malleret, G., David, D. J., Monckton, J. E., Garcia, A. D. R., Sofroniew, M. V., Kandel, E. R., Santarelli, L., Hen, R., & Drew, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • *Center For Neurobiology and Behavior,
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2006-11-14
Volume
103
Issue
46
Pages
17501-17506
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W2108461283
Cited by
1,020
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 83 · 2013: 61 · 2012: 73
FWCI
14.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
adult hippocampal neurogenesis, contextual fear conditioning, dentate gyrus, synaptic plasticity, long-term potentiation, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neural progenitor cells, X-ray irradiation, spatial learning, granule cells, GABAergic inhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Conditioning, Psychological, Electrophysiology, Fear, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Hippocampus, Male, Memory, Mice, Transgenic, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Thymidine Kinase, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review