Cited by 158Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The effects of running and of inhibiting adult neurogenesis on learning and memory in rats.

Wojtowicz, J. Martin, Askew, Michele L., Winocur, Gordon·2008·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The presence of ongoing adult neurogenesis within the highly plastic hippocampal circuitry poses questions as to the relevance of new neurons to learning and memory. Correlational and causal evidence suggests that some, but not all, hippocampal tasks involve the new neurons. The evidence with regard to spatial learning in the water maze, one of the most commonly used hippocampal tasks, is contradictory. In this study we examined the effects of irradiation-induced reduction in neurogenesis on spatial learning and another standard hippocampal task, contextual fear conditioning, in rats that experienced normal cage conditions or voluntary running. The results indicate that reduced neurogenesis had little effect on spatial learning but severely impaired contextual fear conditioning. It was suggested that compensatory mechanisms within the hippocampus may have contributed selectively to sparing of spatial function. Performance on the fear conditioning task was weakly related to enhanced neurogenesis or running. The results improve our understanding of the functional role of adult neurogenesis in behaving animals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06128.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inhibiting the rate of cell proliferation in mice blocked aerobic exercise-induced improvements in contextual memory performance.

    “For example, inhibiting the rate of cell proliferation in mice was sufficient to impair pattern separation (Deng et al., 2010) and block AE-induced improvements in spatial (Clark et al., 2009) and contextual (Wojtowicz et al., 2008) memory performance, but only in conditions in which the task required fine spatial discriminations (i.e., where pattern separation was necessary; Creer et al., 2010).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wojtowicz, J. M., Askew, M. L., & Winocur, G.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Wojtowicz, J. Martin
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-03
Volume
27
Issue
6
Pages
1494-1502
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W2169145097
Cited by
158
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Toronto
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
adult neurogenesis, voluntary running, hippocampus, spatial learning, contextual fear conditioning, compensatory mechanisms, learning and memory, hippocampal plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Fear, Hippocampus, Learning, Male, Memory, Physical Conditioning, Animal, Random Allocation, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review