Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 571

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Incidence of Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hirsch, Lauren, Jette, Nathalie, Frolkis, Alexandra, Steeves, Thomas, Pringsheim, Tamara·2016·Neuroepidemiology
DOI 10.1159/000445751
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder. Epidemiological studies on the incidence of PD are important to better understand the risk factors for PD and determine the condition's natural history. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examine the incidence of PD and its variation by age and gender. Methods: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for epidemiologic studies of PD from 2001 to 2014, as a previously published systematic review included studies published until 2001. Data were analyzed separately for age group and gender, and meta-regression was used to determine whether a significant difference was present between groups. Results: Twenty-seven studies were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis of international studies showed rising incidence with age in both men and women. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the 80+ group, which may be explained by methodological differences between studies. While males had a higher incidence of PD in all age groups, this difference was only statistically significant for those in the age range 60-69 and 70-79 (p < 0.05). Conclusion: PD incidence generally increases with age, although it may stabilize in those who are 80+.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000445751

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Hirsch, L., Jette, N., Frolkis, A., Steeves, T., & Pringsheim, T.
ORCID
Hirsch, Lauren
Venue
Neuroepidemiology
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2016
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
292-300
ISSN
  • 0251-5350
  • 1423-0208
DOI
10.1159/000445751
Cited by
571
References
39
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.