Cited by 53

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

GPER Agonist G1 Attenuates Neuroinflammation and Dopaminergic Neurodegeneration in Parkinson Disease

Guan, Jing, Yang, Beibei, Fan, Yi, Zhang, Ji·2017·Neuroimmunomodulation

Abstract

Objective: Epidemiological studies have shown that women of reproductive age have much less possibility of developing Parkinson disease (PD) than men. The beneficial effect of estrogen also has been well-described in both culture and animal models of PD. G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is a membrane-associated estrogen receptor, and displayed a neuroprotective role in a mouse model of PD. Since GPER is highly expressed in microglia, we speculate that GPER mediates the neuroprotective function of estradiol through suppressing the neuroinflammation of PD. Methods: We investigated the effects of GPER agonist G1 and GPER antagonist G15 on the neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neuron, the activation of microglia, and the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 in 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced animal model of parkinsonism. Furthermore, we confirmed the effects of GPER activation on the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 in an in vitro MPP+ model in BV2 microglial cells. Results: After 12-day treatment with G1, mice showed an increase in the number of tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoreactive cells, reduced activation of microglia, and the abatement of proinflammatory cytokines, and the anti-inflammatory effect of G1 was abolished by G15. Meanwhile, in vitro studies demonstrated that GPER activation also reduced the release of proinflammatory cytokines from BV2 microglial cells after MPP+ stimulation. Conclusion: Our data suggest that GPER mediates the anti-neuroinflammatory effect of estrogen in experimental PD progression.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000478908

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. 10.1111/jnc.13529 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s00415-016-8384-9 · DOI
  3. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001776 · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s13105-012-0159-x · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000338409 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.mce.2014.02.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/nchembio.168 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nchembio775 · DOI
  9. 10.1677/JOE-09-0066 · DOI
  10. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.001499 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/brb3.449 · DOI
  12. 10.3892/mmr.2015.3601 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.nbd.2015.05.017 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2015.07.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.05.022 · DOI
  16. 10.1074/jbc.M112.341867 · DOI
  17. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a4a577 · DOI
  18. 10.1159/000467141 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/7854_2014_356 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.2741/433 · DOI
  21. 10.1155/2015/628192 · DOI
  22. 10.1186/s40035-015-0042-0 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1038/sj.mp.4001007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Guan, J., Yang, B., Fan, Y., & Zhang, J.
Venue
Neuroimmunomodulation
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2017
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
60-66
ISSN
  • 1021-7401
  • 1423-0216
Cited by
53
References
3
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2017-08-16)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review