Cited by 111Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

An Integrated View on Vascular Dysfunction in Alzheimer’s Disease

Open access
Klohs, Jan·2019·Neurodegenerative Diseases

Abstract

Background: Cerebrovascular disease is a common comorbidity in patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). It is believed to contribute additively to the cognitive impairment and to lower the threshold for the development of dementia. However, accumulating evidence suggests that dysfunction of the cerebral vasculature and AD neuropathology interact in multiple ways. Vascular processes even proceed AD neuropathology, implicating a causal role in the etiology of AD. Thus, the review aims to provide an integrated view on vascular dysfunction in AD. Summary: In AD, the cerebral vasculature undergoes pronounced cellular, morphological and structural changes, which alters regulation of blood flow, vascular fluid dynamics and vessel integrity. Stiffening of central blood vessels lead to transmission of excessive pulsatile energy to the brain microvasculature, causing end-organ damage. Moreover, a dysregulated hemostasis and chronic vascular inflammation further impede vascular function, where its mediators interact synergistically. Changes of the cerebral vasculature are triggered and driven by systemic vascular abnormalities that are part of aging, and which can be accelerated and aggravated by cardiovascular diseases. Key Messages: In AD, the cerebral vasculature is the locus where multiple pathogenic processes converge and contribute to cognitive impairment. Understanding the molecular mechanism and pathophysiology of vascular dysfunction in AD and use of vascular blood-based and imaging biomarker in clinical studies may hold promise for future prevention and therapy of the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000505625

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klohs, J.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Klohs, Jan
Venue
Neurodegenerative Diseases
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2019
Volume
19
Issue
3-4
Pages
109-127
ISSN
  • 1660-2854 (ISSN-L)
  • 1660-2862
OpenAlex
W3005672607
Cited by
111
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurodegenerative Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (32NE30_173678/1, 179277)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Universität Zürich
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, vascular dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease, cerebral microvasculature, blood flow regulation, vascular stiffness, pulsatile blood flow, hemostasis, vascular inflammation, aging, cardiovascular disease, cognitive impairment, imaging biomarkers, blood-based biomarkers
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Cerebrovascular Disorders, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review