CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 178

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados no Brasil: distribuição e evolução temporal 2008–2018

Louzada, Maria Laura da Costa, Cruz, Gabriela Lopes da, Silva, Karina Augusta Aparecida Nogueira, Grassi, Ana Giulia Forjaz, Andrade, Giovanna Calixto, Rauber, Fernanda, Levy, Renata Bertazzi, Monteiro, Carlos Augusto·2023·Revista de Saúde Pública
DOI 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744PMC PMC10118420
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJETIVO: Avaliar fatores sociodemográficos associados ao consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados e a evolução temporal do consumo no Brasil entre 2008 e 2018. MÉTODOS: Foram utilizados dados do consumo alimentar de indivíduos com idade ≥ 10 anos das Pesquisas de Orçamentos Familiares (POF) 2008–2009 e 2017–2018. Os alimentos foram agrupados segundo a classificação Nova. Modelos de regressão linear brutos e ajustados foram utilizados para avaliar a associação entre características sociodemográficas e o consumo de ultraprocessados em 2017–2018 e a variação temporal de seu consumo entre 2008 e 2018. RESULTADOS: Alimentos ultraprocessados representaram 19,7% das calorias em 2017–2018. A análise ajustada mostrou que seu consumo foi maior no sexo feminino (versus masculino) e nas regiões Sul e Sudeste (versus Norte), e menor em negros (versus brancos) e na área rural (versus urbana), além de diminuir com o aumento da idade e aumentar com escolaridade e renda. O consumo de ultraprocessados aumentou 1,02 pontos percentuais (pp) de 2008–2009 a 2017–2018, sendo este aumento mais expressivo em homens (+1,59 pp), negros (+2,04 pp), indígenas (+5,96 pp), na área rural (+2,43 pp), naqueles com até 4 anos de estudo (+1,18 pp), no quinto mais baixo de renda (+3,54 pp) e nas regiões Norte (+2,95 pp) e Nordeste (+3,11 pp). Por outro lado, seu consumo se reduziu na maior faixa de escolaridade (-3,30 pp) e no quinto mais alto de renda (-1,65 pp). CONCLUSÕES: Os segmentos socioeconômicos e demográficos que tiveram menor consumo relativo de ultraprocessados em 2017–2018 são justamente os que apresentaram um aumento mais expressivo na análise temporal, apontando para uma tendência de padronização nacional em um patamar de consumo mais alto.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. [1]Swinburn BA Kraak VI Allender S Atkins VJ Baker PI Bogard JR et al The Global Syndemic of Obesity, Undernutrition, and Climate Change: The Lancet Commission report Lancet 2019 393 10173 791 846 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8 30700377 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [3]Askari M Heshmati J Shahinfar H Tripathi N Daneshzad E Ultra-processed food and the risk of overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies Int J Obes 2020 44 10 2080 2091 10.1038/s41366-020-00650-z 32796919 · DOI
  3. [4]Lane MM Davis JA Beattie S Gómez‐Donoso C Loughman A O’Neil A et al Ultraprocessed food and chronic noncommunicable diseases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of 43 observational studies Obes Rev 2021 22 3 e13146 10.1111/obr.13146 33167080 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Pagliai G Dinu M Madarena MP Bonaccio M Iacoviello L Sofi F Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis Br J Nutr 2021 125 3 308 318 10.1017/S0007114520002688 32792031 PMC7844609 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6]Louzada MLC Costa CS Souza TN Cruz GL Levy RB Monteiro CA Impacto do consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados na saúde de crianças, adolescentes e adultos: revisão de escopo Cad Saude Publica 2021 37 Supl 1 e00323020 10.1590/0102-311X00323020 35475880 · DOI
  6. [7]Seferidi P Scrinis G Huybrechts I Woods J Vineis P Millett C The neglected environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods Lancet Planet Health 2020 4 10 e437 e438 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30177-7 33038314 · DOI
  7. [11]Moshfegh AJ Rhodes DG Baer DJ Murayi T Clemens JC Rumpler W V et al The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes Am J Clin Nutr 2008 88 2 324 332 10.1093/ajcn/88.2.324 18689367 · DOI
  8. [12]Moubarac JC Batal M Louzada MLC Martinez Steele E Monteiro CA Consumption of ultra-processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada Appetite 2017 108 512 520 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 27825941 · DOI
  9. [13]Cediel G Reyes M Louzada MLC Martinez Steele E Monteiro CA Corvalán C et al Ultra-processed foods and added sugars in the Chilean diet (2010) Public Health Nutr 2018 21 1 125 133 10.1017/S1368980017001161 28625223 PMC10260868 · DOI
  10. [14]Khandpur N Cediel G Obando DA Jaime PC Parra DC Sociodemographic factors associated with the consumption of ultra-processed foods in Colombia Rev Saude Publica 2020 54 19 10.11606/s1518-8787.2020054001176 32049210 PMC7006913 · DOI
  11. [15]Marrón-Ponce JA Sánchez-Pimienta TG Louzada MLC Batis C Energy contribution of NOVA food groups and sociodemographic determinants of ultra-processed food consumption in the Mexican population Public Health Nutr 2018 21 1 87 93 10.1017/S1368980017002129 28937354 PMC10260747 · DOI
  12. [16]Adams J White M Characterisation of UK diets according to degree of food processing and associations with socio-demographics and obesity: cross-sectional analysis of UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey (2008–12) Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2015 12 1 160 10.1186/s12966-015-0317-y PMC4683717 26684833 · DOI
  13. [17]Baraldi LG Martinez Steele E Canella DS Monteiro CA Consumption of ultra-processed foods and associated sociodemographic factors in the USA between 2007 and 2012: evidence from a nationally representative cross-sectional study BMJ Open 2018 8 3 e020574 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020574 PMC5855172 29525772 · DOI
  14. [20]Monteiro CA Cannon GJ The role of the transnational ultra-processed food industry in the pandemic of obesity and its associated diseases: problems and solutions World Nutr 2019 10 1 89 99 10.26596/wn.201910189-99 · DOI
  15. [21]Maia EG Passos CM Levy RB Martins APB Mais LA Claro RM What to expect from the price of healthy and unhealthy foods over time? The case from Brazil Public Health Nutr 2020 23 4 579 588 10.1017/S1368980019003586 31937385 PMC7058424 · DOI
  16. [23]Zagorsky JL Smith PK The association between socioeconomic status and adult fast-food consumption in the U.S Econ Hum Biol 2017 27 Part A 12 25 10.1016/j.ehb.2017.04.004 28472714 · DOI
  17. [24]Moubarac JC Batal M Martins APB Claro R Levy RB Cannon G et al Processed and ultra-processed food products: consumption trends in Canada from 1938 to 2011 Can J Diet Pract Res 2014 75 1 15 21 10.3148/75.1.2014.15 24606955 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [25]Marrón-Ponce JA Tolentino-Mayo L Hernandez-F M Batis C Trends in ultra-processed food purchases from 1984 to 2016 in Mexican households Nutrients 2018 11 1 45 10.3390/nu11010045 30587779 PMC6356651 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [26]Vandevijvere S Jaacks LM Monteiro CA Moubarac JC Girling‐Butcher M Lee AC et al Global trends in ultraprocessed food and drink product sales and their association with adult body mass index trajectories Obes Rev 2019 20 Suppl 2 10 19 10.1111/obr.12860 31099480 · DOI
  20. [27]Rodrigues RM De Carli E Araújo MC Verly E Junior Marchioni DML Bezerra IN et al Limitações na comparação dos Inquéritos Nacionais de Alimentação de 2008–2009 e 2017–2018 Rev Saude Publica 2021 55 Supl 1 3s 10.11606/s1518- PMC9586432 34910053 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Louzada, M. L. D. C., Cruz, G. L. D., Silva, K. A. A. N., Grassi, A. G. F., Andrade, G. C., Rauber, F., Levy, R. B., & Monteiro, C. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública. Departamento de Nutrição. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Universidade de São Paulo. Núcleo de Pesquisas Epidemiológicas em Nutrição e Saúde. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
  • Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil
ORCID
Venue
Revista de Saúde Pública
Publisher
Universidade de São Paulo. Agência de Bibliotecas e Coleções Digitais
Published
2023-03-15
Volume
57
Issue
1
Pages
12
ISSN
  • 1518-8787
  • 0034-8910
DOI
10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004744
PMC
PMC10118420
Cited by
178
References
3
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review