Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion as a Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular Events in Women: Results From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE)

von Mering, Gregory O., Arant, Christopher B., Wessel, Timothy R., McGorray, Susan P., Bairey Merz, C. Noel, Sharaf, Barry L., Smith, Karen M., Olson, Marian B., Johnson, B. Delia, Sopko, George, Handberg, Eileen, Pepine, Carl J., Kerensky, Richard A.·2004·Circulation

Abstract

Background— Coronary vascular dysfunction has been linked to atherosclerosis and adverse cardiovascular outcomes in men, but these relationships have not been firmly established in women. Methods and Results— As part of the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, 163 women referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography underwent coronary reactivity assessment with quantitative coronary angiography and intracoronary Doppler flow before and after intracoronary administration of acetylcholine, adenosine, and nitroglycerin and were then followed up for clinical outcomes. History of hypertension was present in 61%, dyslipidemia in 54%, diabetes in 26%, and current tobacco use in 21% of women enrolled. Seventy-five percent had no or only mild epicardial coronary artery disease (CAD). Over a median follow-up of 48 months, events occurred in 58 women. On bivariate analysis, women with an event had significantly less change in coronary cross-sectional area (ΔCSA) in response to acetylcholine ( P =0.0006) and nitroglycerin ( P =0.04). In addition, women with abnormal coronary dilator response to acetylcholine had less time free from cardiovascular events ( P =0.004). In multivariable analysis, after controlling for age, hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, tobacco use, and CAD severity, %ΔCSA with acetylcholine ( P =0.001) independently predicted events. When the outcome was restricted to only death, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and stroke, %ΔCSA with acetylcholine remained a significant predictor ( P =0.006). Conclusions— In women in this study, impaired coronary vasomotor response to acetylcholine was independently linked to adverse cardiovascular outcomes regardless of CAD severity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/01.cir.0000115525.92645.16

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
von Mering, G. O., Arant, C. B., Wessel, T. R., McGorray, S. P., Bairey Merz, C. N., Sharaf, B. L., Smith, K. M., Olson, M. B., Johnson, B. D., Sopko, G., Handberg, E., Pepine, C. J., & Kerensky, R. A.
Venue
Circulation
Published
2004-02-17
Volume
109
Issue
6
Pages
722-725
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2142653039
Cited by
369
References
14
FWCI
12.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion as a Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular Events in Women: Results From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.0000115525.92645.16
The paper
von Mering, G. O., Arant, C. B., Wessel, T. R., McGorray, S. P., Bairey Merz, C. N., Sharaf, B. L., Smith, K. M., Olson, M. B., Johnson, B. D., Sopko, G., Handberg, E., Pepine, C. J., & Kerensky, R. A. (2004). Abnormal Coronary Vasomotion as a Prognostic Indicator of Cardiovascular Events in Women: Results From the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000115525.92645.16

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.