The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reconstruction of Brachial Artery Pressure From Noninvasive Finger Pressure Measurements
Abstract
Background Pulse wave distortions, mainly caused by reflections, and pressure gradients, caused by flow in the resistive vascular tree, may cause differences between finger and brachial artery pressures. These differences may limit the use of finger pressure measurements. We investigated whether brachial artery pressure waves could be reconstructed from finger pressure measurements by correcting for the pressure gradient in addition to correction for pulse wave distortion with a previously described filter. Methods and Results Finger artery pressure (with Finapres), intra-arterial brachial artery pressure (BAP), Riva-Rocci/Korotkoff (RRK), oscillometric, and return-to-flow (RTF) measurements were simultaneously performed in 57 healthy elderly subjects and patients with vascular disease and/or hypertension. A generalized waveform filter was used to correct for pulse wave distortions. Correction equations for the pressure gradient, based on finger pressure, RRK, RTF, or oscillometric measurements, were obtained in 28 randomly selected subjects and tested in 29. Before reconstruction, Finapres underestimated mean and diastolic BAP (finger pressure minus BAP: systolic, −3.2±16.9 mm Hg; mean, −13.0±10.5 mm Hg; diastolic, −8.4±9.0 mm Hg [mean±SD]). After filtering, reconstructed BAP waves were similar to actual BAP in shape but not in pressure level. Optimal correction for the pressure gradient with an equation based on RTF measurements reduced the pressure differences to meet American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria (reconstructed finger pressure minus BAP: systolic, 3.7±7.0 mm Hg; mean, 0.7±4.6 mm Hg; and diastolic, 1.0±4.9 mm Hg). Conclusions BAP waves can be reconstructed from noninvasive finger pressure registrations when finger pressure waves are corrected for pulse wave distortion and individual pressure gradients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parati, G., Casadei, R., Groppelli, A., Di Rienzo, M., & Mancia, G. (1989) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/01.hyp.13.6.647 · Cited by 899
KARAMANOGLU, M., O'ROURKE, M. F., AVOLIO, A. P., & KELLY, R. P. (1993) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/14.2.160 · Cited by 873
Cited by
Becker, H. F., Jerrentrup, A., Ploch, T., Grote, L., Penzel, T., Sullivan, C. E., & Peter, J. H. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000042706.47107.7a · Cited by 931
Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology
Imholz, B. (1998) · Cardiovascular Research · doi:10.1016/s0008-6363(98)00067-4 · Cited by 834
Principles and Techniques of Blood Pressure Measurement
Ogedegbe, G., & Pickering, T. (2010) · Cardiology Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2010.07.006 · Cited by 554
Nisenbaum, M. G., Melo, N. R. D., Giribela, C. R. G., Morais, T. L. D., Guerra, G. M., de Angelis, K., Mostarda, C., Baracat, E. C., & Consolim-Colombo, F. M. (2014) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.01.006 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Bos, W. J. W., van Goudoever, J., van Montfrans, G. A., van den Meiracker, A. H., & Wesseling, K. H.
- Venue
- Circulation
- Published
- 1996-10-15
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1870-1875
- ISSN
- 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4539
- OpenAlex
- W2104988375
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reconstruction of Brachial Artery Pressure From Noninvasive Finger Pressure Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1870
- The paper
- Bos, W. J. W., van Goudoever, J., van Montfrans, G. A., van den Meiracker, A. H., & Wesseling, K. H. (1996). Reconstruction of Brachial Artery Pressure From Noninvasive Finger Pressure Measurements. Circulation. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.94.8.1870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.