Cited by 698Fatty Acid Research and HealthNutritional Studies and DietLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Effects of n−3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Diabetes Mellitus

Open access
The ASCEND Study Collaborative Group·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased intake of n-3 fatty acids has been associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease in observational studies, but this finding has not been confirmed in randomized trials. It remains unclear whether n-3 (also called omega-3) fatty acid supplementation has cardiovascular benefit in patients with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: We randomly assigned 15,480 patients with diabetes but without evidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease to receive 1-g capsules containing either n-3 fatty acids (fatty acid group) or matching placebo (olive oil) daily. The primary outcome was a first serious vascular event (i.e., nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, transient ischemic attack, or vascular death, excluding confirmed intracranial hemorrhage). The secondary outcome was a first serious vascular event or any arterial revascularization. RESULTS: During a mean follow-up of 7.4 years (adherence rate, 76%), a serious vascular event occurred in 689 patients (8.9%) in the fatty acid group and in 712 (9.2%) in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.08; P=0.55). The composite outcome of a serious vascular event or revascularization occurred in 882 patients (11.4%) and 887 patients (11.5%), respectively (rate ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09). Death from any cause occurred in 752 patients (9.7%) in the fatty acid group and in 788 (10.2%) in the placebo group (rate ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.05). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of nonfatal serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with diabetes without evidence of cardiovascular disease, there was no significant difference in the risk of serious vascular events between those who were assigned to receive n-3 fatty acid supplementation and those who were assigned to receive placebo. (Funded by the British Heart Foundation and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN60635500 ; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00135226 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1804989

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The inclusion rate in OMEMI was 26% of screened candidates, which is relatively low compared to other n-3 PUFA trials not targeting elderly patients.

    “A limitation to the study is the inclusion rate of 26 % of screened candidates, which is relatively low compared to other n-3 PUFA trials not targeting elderly patients 30-33 .”

    From Effects of n-3 Fatty Acid Supplements in Elderly Patients After Myocardial Infarction (2021) · cites this paper as [32]

    The participant-flow figures in the Effects on Cancer and Other Nonvascular Outcomes section report 121,254 people assessed for eligibility and 15,480 randomized in ASCEND—about 13%. On that screened-candidate basis, ASCEND’s inclusion rate was lower, not higher, than the stated 26% for OMEMI. The source does not report OMEMI’s own inclusion rate. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The STRENGTH, VITAL, ASCEND, ORIGIN, OMEGA, ALPHA-OMEGA, GISSI-HF and GISSI-P trials randomized patients to receive either a combination of EPA and DHA or placebo; yet only the GISSI trials noted a statistically significant effect on cardiovascular events and mortality.

    “The STRENGTH, VITAL, ASCEND, ORIGIN, OMEGA, ALPHA-OMEGA, GISSI-HF and GISSI-P trials randomized patients to receive either a combination of EPA and DHA or placebo; yet only the GISSI trials noted a statistically significant effect on cardiovascular events and mortality [96–103].”

    From Established and Emerging Lipid-Lowering Drugs for Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [100]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Clinical trials revealed that omega-3 PUFA supplementation of <1 g/d resulted in a very limited reduction in atherosclerotic CVD risk of major vascular events and CVD-caused deaths.

    “Clinical trials revealed that ω3 PUFA supplementation of <1 g/d resulted in a very limited reduction in atherosclerotic CVD risk of major vascular events and CVD‐caused deaths. 22 , 23 , 133 , 154”

    From Association Between Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Dyslipidemia: A Continuous Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (2023) · cites this paper as [133]

    The Procedures section describes a daily capsule containing 840 mg of n−3 fatty acids, below 1 g. The Primary and Secondary Outcomes section reports a small, nonsignificant difference in serious vascular events (8.9% versus 9.2%) and fewer vascular deaths only in exploratory analyses. Thus the paper supports limited evidence of benefit, but not the claim that supplementation established a reduction in both outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Earlier trials GISSI-Prevenzione, ASCEND, VITAL, and OMEMI evaluated low-dose EPA/DHA mixtures primarily in primary prevention settings or post-MI patients, often without significant baseline TG elevation and with limited use of statins in earlier trials.

    “Earlier trials such as GISSI-Prevenzione, ASCEND, VITAL, and OMEMI evaluated low-dose EPA/DHA mixtures primarily in primary prevention settings or post-MI patients, often without significant baseline TG elevation and with limited use of statins in earlier trials [87–90].”

    From Targeting Triglycerides in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Emerging Therapies (2026) · cites this paper as [88]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Across several major RCTs (REDUCE-IT, RESPECT-EPA, GISSI-HF, ASCEND), the magnitude of CV benefit equaled or exceeded the observed increase in AF risk.

    “Across several major RCTs, such as REDUCE-IT69, 125, RESPECT-EPA76, GISSI-HF77 and ASCEND79, 105; the magnitude of CV benefit equaled or exceeded the observed increase in AF risk.”

    From Effects of Omega-3 Fatty Acid Treatment on Risk for Atrial Fibrillation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 35 Trials including 114 592 Individuals (2026) · cites this paper as [79]

    The paper identifies ASCEND as a randomized trial and reports fewer vascular deaths in an exploratory analysis (Primary and Secondary Outcomes; page not provided). But it found no significant reduction in serious vascular events, and our copy does not report an increase in atrial fibrillation risk or compare that risk with cardiovascular benefit. The claimed benefit–risk comparison for ASCEND is therefore unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
The ASCEND Study Collaborative Group
Affiliations
MRC Population Health Research Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
The ASCEND Study Collaborative Group
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-10-18
Volume
379
Issue
16
Pages
1540-1550
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2900151286
Cited by
698
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 92 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 100 · 2020: 119 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
71.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Solvay
  • Mylan
  • Bayer U.S.
  • British Heart Foundation (SP/03/02, SP/08/010/25939, SP/14/1331114)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
omega-3 fatty acids, omega-3 supplementation, diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, vascular revascularization, mortality, olive oil placebo, cardiovascular risk
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aspirin, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Treatment Outcome, Dietary Supplements, Diabetes Complications, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review