Cited by 433Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Carotid Baroreceptor Stimulation, Sympathetic Activity, Baroreflex Function, and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

Heusser, Karsten, Tank, Jens, Engeli, Stefan, Diedrich, André, Menne, Jan, Eckert, Siegfried, Peters, Tim, Sweep, Fred C.G.J. +4 more·2010·Hypertension

Abstract

In animals, electric field stimulation of carotid baroreceptors elicits a depressor response through sympathetic inhibition. We tested the hypothesis that the stimulation acutely reduces sympathetic vasomotor tone and blood pressure in patients with drug treatment–resistant arterial hypertension. Furthermore, we tested whether the stimulation impairs the physiological baroreflex regulation. We studied 7 men and 5 women (ages 43 to 69 years) with treatment-resistant arterial hypertension. A bilateral electric baroreflex stimulator at the level of the carotid sinus (Rheos) was implanted ≥1 month before the study. We measured intra-arterial blood pressure, heart rate, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (microneurography), cardiac baroreflex sensitivity (cross-spectral analysis and sequence method), sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity (threshold technique), plasma renin, and norepinephrine concentrations. Measurements were performed under resting conditions, with and without electric baroreflex stimulation, for ≥6 minutes during the same experiment. Intra-arterial blood pressure was 193±9/94±5 mm Hg on medications. Acute electric baroreflex stimulation decreased systolic blood pressure by 32±10 mm Hg (range: +7 to −108 mm Hg; P =0.01). The depressor response was correlated with a muscle sympathetic nerve activity reduction ( r 2 =0.42; P <0.05). In responders, muscle sympathetic nerve activity decreased sharply when electric stimulation started. Then, muscle sympathetic nerve activity increased but remained below the baseline level throughout the stimulation period. Heart rate decreased 4.5±1.5 bpm with stimulation ( P <0.05). Plasma renin concentration decreased 20±8% ( P <0.05). Electric field stimulation of carotid sinus baroreflex afferents acutely decreased arterial blood pressure in hypertensive patients, without negative effects on physiological baroreflex regulation. The depressor response was mediated through sympathetic inhibition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/hypertensionaha.109.140665

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An implantable device for bilateral electric baroreceptor stimulation that decreases sympathetic tone alleviates obesity-associated hypertension in experimental and clinical settings.

    “An implantable device for bilateral electric baroreceptor stimulation that decreases sympathetic tone alleviates obesity-associated hypertension in experimental and clinical settings (22–24).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heusser, K., Tank, J., Engeli, S., Diedrich, A., Menne, J., Eckert, S., Peters, T., Sweep, F. C. G. J., Haller, H., Pichlmaier, A. M., Luft, F. C., & Jordan, J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • From the Institute of Clinical Pharmacology (K.H., J.T., S.En., J.J.), Department of Internal Medicine (J.M., H.H.), and Division of Cardiothoracic, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery (A.M.P.), Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; Autonomic Dysfunction Service (A.D.), Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tenn; Department of Cardiology (S.Ec.), Ruhr University of Bochum, Bad Oeyenhausen, Germany; R&amp;D Consulting (T.P.), Riehen, Switzerland; Department of Chemical Endocrinology (F.C.G.J.S.),...
Venue
Hypertension
Published
2010-03
Volume
55
Issue
3
Pages
619-626
ISSN
  • 0194-911X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4563
OpenAlex
W2162619801
Cited by
433
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 39
FWCI
29.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hypertension (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL056693)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Keywords
carotid sinus, treatment-resistant hypertension, hypertension, muscle sympathetic nerve activity, baroreflex sensitivity, sympathetic vasomotor tone, blood pressure reduction, plasma renin, norepinephrine, heart rate, electrical field stimulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Carotid Sinus, Drug Resistance, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Feasibility Studies, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Neural Inhibition, Pressoreceptors, Prospective Studies, Renin, Stroke Volume, Sympathetic Nervous System, Baroreflex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review