Cited by 62Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlRenin-Angiotensin System Studies

The Sympathetic Nervous System in Obesity Hypertension

Open access
Lohmeier, Thomas E., Iliescu, Radu·2013·Current Hypertension Reports

Abstract

Abundant evidence supports a role of the sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of obesity-related hypertension. However, the nature and temporal progression of mechanisms underlying this sympathetically mediated hypertension are incompletely understood. Recent technological advances allowing direct recordings of renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in conscious animals, together with direct suppression of RSNA by renal denervation and reflex-mediated global sympathetic inhibition in experimental animals and human subjects have been especially valuable in elucidating these mechanisms. These studies strongly support the concept that increased RSNA is the critical mechanism by which increased central sympathetic outflow initiates and maintains reductions in renal excretory function, causing obesity hypertension. Potential determinants of renal sympathoexcitation and the differential mechanisms mediating the effects of renal-specific versus reflex-mediated, global sympathetic inhibition on renal hemodynamics and cardiac autonomic function are discussed. These differential mechanisms may impact the efficacy of current device-based approaches for hypertension therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11906-013-0356-1

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lohmeier, T. E., & Iliescu, R.
Affiliations
University of Mississippi Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lohmeier, Thomas E.
  • Iliescu, Radu
Venue
Current Hypertension Reports
Published
2013-05-16
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
409-416
ISSN
  • 1522-6417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3111
OpenAlex
W1992123574
Cited by
62
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Hypertension Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL‐51971, P01HL051971)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
Keywords
sympathetic nervous system, renal sympathetic nerve activity, renal denervation, renal excretory function, renal hemodynamics, cardiac autonomic function, sympathoexcitation
MeSH terms
Animals, Denervation, Humans, Hypertension, Kidney, Obesity, Renin-Angiotensin System, Sympathetic Nervous System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review