Cited by 621Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Cuffless Blood Pressure Estimation Algorithms for Continuous Health-Care Monitoring

Kachuee, Mohammad, Kiani, Mohammad Mahdi, Mohammadzade, Hoda, Shabany, Mahdi·2017·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

GOAL: Continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring can provide invaluable information about individuals' health conditions. However, BP is conventionally measured using inconvenient cuff-based instruments, which prevents continuous BP monitoring. This paper presents an efficient algorithm, based on the pulse arrival time (PAT), for the continuous and cuffless estimation of the systolic BP, diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) values. METHODS: The proposed framework estimates the BP values through processing vital signals and extracting two types of features, which are based on either physiological parameters or whole-based representation of vital signals. Finally, the regression algorithms are employed for the BP estimation. Although the proposed algorithm works reliably without any need for calibration, an optional calibration procedure is also suggested, which can improve the system's accuracy even further. RESULTS: The proposed method is evaluated on about a thousand subjects using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) and the British Hypertension Society (BHS) standards. The method complies with the AAMI standard in the estimation of DBP and MAP values. Regarding the BHS protocol, the results achieve grade A for the estimation of DBP and grade B for the estimation of MAP. CONCLUSION: We conclude that by using the PAT in combination with informative features from the vital signals, the BP can be accurately and reliably estimated in a noninvasive fashion. SIGNIFICANCE: The results indicate that the proposed algorithm for the cuffless estimation of the BP can potentially enable mobile health-care gadgets to monitor the BP continuously.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2016.2580904

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kachuee, M., Kiani, M. M., Mohammadzade, H., & Shabany, M.
Affiliations
Sharif University of Technology (IR)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2017-04
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
859-869
ISSN
  • 0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2531
OpenAlex
W2431637923
Cited by
621
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 67 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 14
FWCI
14.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
cuffless blood pressure measurement, pulse arrival time, continuous blood pressure monitoring, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, vital signs, regression estimation, calibration, non-invasive blood pressure measurement, mobile health monitoring
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Humans, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Monitors, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review