The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Returns to Computer Use Revisited: Have Pencils Changed the Wage Structure Too?
Abstract
Are the large measured wage differentials for on-the-job computer use a true return to computer skills, or do they just reflect that higher wage workers use computers on their jobs? We examine this issue with three large cross-sectional surveys from Germany. First, we confirm that the estimated wage differential associated with computer use in Germany is very similar to the U. S. differential. Second, we also measure large differentials for on-the-job use of calculators, telephones, pens or pencils, or for those who work while sitting down. We argue that these findings cast some doubt on the literal interpretation of the computer use wage differential as reflecting true returns to computer use or skill.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08746 · Cited by 5,513
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2010) · doi:10.3386/w16082 · Cited by 2,180
Computing inequality: have computers changed the labor market?
Autor, D. H., Katz, L. F., & Krueger, A. B. (1998) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355398555874 · Cited by 1,830
Technical change, inequality, and the labor market
Acemoglu, D. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.40.1.7 · Cited by 1,767
The ‘Task Approach’ to Labor Markets – An Overview
Autor, D. H. (2013) · Journal for Labour Market Research · doi:10.1007/s12651-013-0128-z · Cited by 382
Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. W. (2016) · Handbook of the Economics of Education · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63459-7.00005-1 · Cited by 284
Violante, G. L. (2008) · The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics · doi:10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2388-1 · Cited by 238
Ill Communication: Technology, distraction & student performance
Beland, L.-P., & Murphy, R. (2016) · Labour Economics · doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2016.04.004 · Cited by 236
Causal Inference in Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Research
Gage, S. H., Munafò, M. R., & Davey Smith, G. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033352 · Cited by 173
(2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 143
Sleep, health, and human capital: Evidence from daylight saving time
Jin, L., & Ziebarth, N. R. (2020) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2019.12.003 · Cited by 68
Technology and Education: Computers, Software, and the Internet
Bulman, G., & Fairlie, R. (2016) · doi:10.3386/w22237 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- DiNardo, J. E., & Pischke, J.-S.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-02-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-303
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2107545377
- Cited by
- 603
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 59.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
