Cited by 173Advanced Causal Inference TechniquesBirth, Development, and HealthStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Causal Inference in Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD) Research

Open access
Gage, Suzanne H., Munafò, Marcus R., Davey Smith, George·2016·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Studies of the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) often rely on prospective observational data, from which associations between developmental exposures and outcomes in later life can be identified. Typically, conventional statistical methods are used in an attempt to mitigate problems inherent in observational data, such as confounding and reverse causality, but these have serious limitations. In this review, we discuss a variety of methods that are increasingly being used in observational epidemiological studies to help strengthen causal inference. These methods include negative controls, cross-contextual designs, instrumental variables (including Mendelian randomization), family-based studies, and natural experiments. Applications within the DOHaD framework, and in relation to behavioral, psychiatric, and psychological domains, are considered, and the considerable potential for expanding the use of these methods is outlined.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033352

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breastfeeding, which is socially patterned in the UK but not in Brazil, was found to be associated with obesity only in the UK sample, whereas the association with IQ was observed in both the UK and Brazilian samples, indicating that the association with obesity is likely to be due to residual confounding, whilst that for IQ is more likely to be causal.

    “For example, breastfeeding, which is socially patterned in the UK but not in Brazil, was found to be associated with obesity only in the UK sample, whereas the association with IQ was observed in both the UK and Brazilian samples, indicating that the association with obesity is likely to be due to residual confounding, whilst that for IQ is more likely to be causal (64).”

    From Association Between Cannabis and Psychosis: Epidemiologic Evidence (2016) · cites this paper as [64]

    Split into 3 atoms — 2 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rothman K, Greenland S, Lash TL. 2008. Modern Epidemiology. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gage, S. H., Munafò, M. R., & Davey Smith, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • 1MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) at the University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2BN, United Kingdom; email: kz.davey-smith@bristol.ac.uk
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2016-01-04
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pages
567-585
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W1926125597
Cited by
173
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Cancer Research UK
  • British Heart Foundation
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K023195/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
developmental origins of health and disease, causal inference, observational studies, confounding, reverse causality, negative control, instrumental variables, Mendelian randomization, family studies, natural experiment, early life exposure, behavioral effects, mental health outcomes, psychological outcomes
MeSH terms
Health Status, Humans, Prospective Studies, Research Design, Epidemiologic Research Design, Causality, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review