Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 232

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Computational Model of How the Basal Ganglia Produce Sequences

Berns, Gregory S., Sejnowski, Terrence J.·1998·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

We propose a systems-level computational model of the basal ganglia based closely on known anatomy and physiology. First, we assume that the thalamic targets, which relay ascending information to cortical action and planning areas, are tonically inhibited by the basal ganglia. Second, we assume that the output stage of the basal ganglia, the internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), selects a single action from several competing actions via lateral interactions. Third, we propose that a form of local working memory exists in the form of reciprocal connections between the external globus pallidus (GPe) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN). As a test of the model, the system was trained to learn a sequence of states that required the context of previous actions. The striatum, which was assumed to represent a conjunction of cortical states, directly selected the action in the GP during training. The STN-to-GP connection strengths were modified by an associative learning rule and came to encode the sequence after 20 to 40 iterations through the sequence. Subsequently, the system automatically reproduced the sequence when cued to the first action. The behavior of the model was found to be sensitive to the ratio of the striatal-nigral learning rate to the STN-GP learning rate. Additionally, the degree of striatal inhibition of the globus pallidus had a significant influence on both learning and the ability to select an action. Low learning rates, which would be hypothesized to reflect low levels of dopamine, as in Parkinson's disease, led to slow acquisition of contextual information. However, this could be partially offset by modeling a lesion of the globus pallidus that resulted in an increase in the gain of the STN units. The parameter sensitivity of the model is discussed within the framework of existing behavioral and lesion data.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/089892998563815

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 232

Metadata

Authors
Berns, G. S., & Sejnowski, T. J.
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
1998-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
108-121
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2160017783
Cited by
232
References
9
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Computational Model of How the Basal Ganglia Produce Sequences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/089892998563815
The paper
Berns, G. S., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1998). A Computational Model of How the Basal Ganglia Produce Sequences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892998563815

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.