Cited by 18Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Frontostriatal contribution to the interplay of flexibility and stability in serial prediction

Open access
Trempler, Ima, Schiffer, Anne-Marike, El-Sourani, Nadiya, Ahlheim, Christiane, Fink, Gereon R., Schubotz, Ricarda I.·2017·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Surprising events may be relevant or irrelevant for behavior, requiring either flexible adjustment or stabilization of our model of the world and according response strategies. Cognitive flexibility and stability in response to environmental demands have been described as separable cognitive states, associated with activity of striatal and lateral prefrontal regions, respectively. It so far remains unclear, however, whether these two states act in an antagonistic fashion and which neural mechanisms mediate the selection of respective responses, on the one hand, and a transition between these states, on the other. In this study, we tested whether the functional dichotomy between striatal and prefrontal activity applies for the separate functions of updating (in response to changes in the environment, i.e., switches) and shielding (in response to chance occurrences of events violating expectations, i.e., drifts) of current predictions. We measured brain activity using fMRI while 20 healthy participants performed a task that required to serially predict upcoming items. Switches between predictable sequences had to be indicated via button press while sequence omissions (drifts) had to be ignored. We further varied the probability of switches and drifts to assess the neural network supporting the transition between flexible and stable cognitive states as a function of recent performance history in response to environmental demands. Flexible switching between models was associated with activation in medial pFC (BA 9 and BA 10), whereas stable maintenance of the internal model corresponded to activation in the lateral pFC (BA 6 and inferior frontal gyrus). Our findings extend previous studies on the interplay of flexibility and stability, suggesting that different prefrontal regions are activated by different types of prediction errors, dependent on their behavioral requirements. Furthermore, we found that striatal activation in response to switches and drifts was modulated by participants' successful behavior toward these events, suggesting the striatum to be responsible for response selections following unpredicted stimuli. Finally, we observed that the dopaminergic midbrain modulates the transition between different cognitive states, thresholded by participants' individual performance history in response to temporal environmental demands.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn_a_01040

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in activity of the striatum and frontal areas may contribute to impulsivity and inflexibility.

    “The deficits activity of the striatum and frontal areas may contribute to impulsivity and inflexibility (Dalley et al., 2008; Sakagami and Pan, 2007; Trempler et al., 2017)”

    From Predictive coding in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic transdiagnostic review. (2025) · cites this paper as Trempler et al., 2017

    The Abstract and Discussion link prefrontal and striatal activity to cognitive flexibility, stability, and correct response selection. They do not show that deficits in those regions contribute to impulsivity, and the Discussion associates failure to adapt flexibly with increased activity in the substantia nigra, not a frontal or striatal activity deficit. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trempler, I., Schiffer, A.-M., El-Sourani, N., Ahlheim, C., Fink, G. R., & Schubotz, R. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Münster (DE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2017-02-01
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
298-309
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2516099833
Cited by
18
References
68
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
cognitive flexibility, cognitive stability, prediction error, prediction updating, medial prefrontal cortex, lateral prefrontal cortex, striatum, dopaminergic midbrain, response selection, surprise, environmental demands, performance history
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motor Activity, Neural Pathways, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen, Probability Learning, Visual Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult, Executive Function, Anticipation, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review