Cited by 72Neural dynamics and brain functionAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingNeural Networks and Applications

Bayesian spiking neurons II: learning

Deneve, Sophie·2008·Neural Computation

Abstract

In the companion letter in this issue (“Bayesian Spiking Neurons I: Inference”), we showed that the dynamics of spiking neurons can be interpreted as a form of Bayesian integration, accumulating evidence over time about events in the external world or the body. We proceed to develop a theory of Bayesian learning in spiking neural networks, where the neurons learn to recognize temporal dynamics of their synaptic inputs. Meanwhile, successive layers of neurons learn hierarchical causal models for the sensory input. The corresponding learning rule is local, spike-time dependent, and highly nonlinear. This approach provides a principled description of spiking and plasticity rules maximizing information transfer, while limiting the number of costly spikes, between successive layers of neurons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.2008.20.1.118

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deneve, S.
Affiliations
Group for Neural Theory, Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Ecole Normale Supérieure, College de France 75005 Paris, France
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
2008-01
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
118-145
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W2144540603
Cited by
71
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
Keywords
spiking neurons, Bayesian learning, spike-timing-dependent plasticity, spiking neural networks, information transmission, learning rules, Bayesian inference
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Algorithms, Animals, Bayes Theorem, Central Nervous System, Computer Simulation, Humans, Learning, Markov Chains, Nerve Net, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Time Perception, Poisson Distribution, Neural Networks, Computer, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review