Cited by 105Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health and PsychiatrySchizophrenia research and treatment

Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

Open access
Corlett, Philip R, Fletcher, Paul C·2014·The Lancet Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s2215-0366(14)70298-6

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 45 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Mismatches between inputs and expectations are signalled and reduced by ignoring, changing, or updating.

    “Mismatches are signalled and minimised in several possible ways: they can be ignored (experiencing what we expect rather than what is presented by our senses), changed (altering the world to fit expectation), or updated (a changed model of the world).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Friston, 2009, The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Error minimisation can be viewed as a core survival principle.

    “Error minimisation can be seen as a core principle of survival (avoid surprises to stay alive) 8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Friston, 2009, The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationreasoning
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Anomalies in how prediction error arises, what it is like, and how it is responded to can explain the emergence of psychosis.

    “we propose that anomalies in the genesis of prediction error, its nature, and our responses to it can explain the emergence of psychosis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [8] Friston, 2009, The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] Gross, 1972, Sensory disorders in schizophrenia, Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Corlett, 2010, Toward a neurobiology of delusions, Prog Neurobiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    People with schizophrenia may also disregard evidence that contradicts their decision.

    “They might also ignore pieces of evidence that contradict that decision.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [4] Garety, 2001, A cognitive model of the positive symptoms of psychosis, Psychol Med source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Langdon, 2014, Jumping to delusions in early psychosis, Cogn Neuropsychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Wittorf, 2012, Specificity of jumping to conclusions and attributional biases: a comparison between patients with schizophrenia, depression, and anorexia nervosa, Cogn Neuropsychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Predictive coding models explain psychotic experiences as attempts to account for and reduce uncertainty.

    “Predictive coding models explain these experiences as attempts to account for and minimise uncertainty.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [10] Corlett, 2010, Toward a neurobiology of delusions, Prog Neurobiol source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. 10
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 3
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Predictive coding theory holds that the brain aims to predict the world and improve its predictions by reducing errors.

    “predictive coding theory, which asserts that the brain strives to predict the world and optimise its predictions by minimising errors.8”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Friston, 2009, The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Perturbed dopamine transmission is related to psychosis through disrupted learning mechanisms, linking psychotic experiences to neurochemistry.

    “relating perturbed dopamine transmission to psychosis via disrupted learning mechanisms, [12][13][14] thus linking psychotic experiences to neurochemistry.10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [12] Kapur, 2003, Psychosis as a state of aberrant salience: a framework linking biology, phenomenology, and pharmacology in schizophrenia, Am J Psychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [13] Miller, 1976, Schizophrenic psychology, associative learning and the role of forebrain dopamine, Med Hypotheses source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [14] Gray, 1991, The neuropsychology of schizophrenia, Behav Brain Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    The JTC bias may arise from altered noise in decision making.

    “For example, the JTC bias might arise because of altered noise in decision making.7”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Moutoussis, 2011, Bayesian modelling of Jumping-to-Conclusions bias in delusional patients, Cogn Neuropsychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    In early psychosis, the world becomes strange and unpredictable, with complex, distressing, and socially isolating experiences.

    “In the early phases of psychosis, the world becomes a strange, unpredictable place, with complex, distressing, and socially isolating experiences.9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Gross, 1972, Sensory disorders in schizophrenia, Arch Psychiatr Nervenkr source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Predictive coding includes top-down signalling through NMDA glutamate receptors and bottom-up prediction-error signalling through AMPA receptors.

    “In simplified terms, predictive coding includes top-down signalling via N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors and bottom-up (prediction error) signalling via α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole-propionic acid (AMPA) receptors.15”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [15] Friston, 2005, A theory of cortical responses, Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    The brain infers the causes of its inputs from experience and tests those inferences by predicting future inputs.

    “The brain infers the causes of its inputs on the basis of such experience and tests its inferences by making predictions about ensuing inputs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Friston, 2009, The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain?, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    The JTC bias is not specific, and on its own it has very limited explanatory value.

    “However, although the bias is invoked in this way to explain delusions, it is not specific 6 and, alone, its explanatory value is very restricted.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] Wittorf, 2012, Specificity of jumping to conclusions and attributional biases: a comparison between patients with schizophrenia, depression, and anorexia nervosa, Cogn Neuropsychiatry source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Bayesian analysis should not be confused with Bayesian processing.

    “So, Bayesian analysis should not be conflated with Bayesian processing.26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Bowers, 2012, Bayesian just-so stories in psychology and neuroscience, Psychol Bull source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    The brain is embedded in an environment that should be described in social and environmental terms.

    “The brain is embedded in an environment that should be described in terms that include the social and the environmental.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Clark, 2013, Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science, The Behav Brain Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    The balance between extinction and reconsolidation of memories may be disrupted in people with psychosis, with less extinction learning and possible strengthening of beliefs during extinction trials.

    “This balance between extinction and reconsolidation of memories might be disrupted in people with psychosis, such that there is reduced extinction learning and possibly even belief-strengthening on extinction trials.22”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Corlett, 2009, Why do delusions persist?, Front Hum Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Delusions, though fixed and resistant to contradictory evidence, can expand to incorporate such evidence in a way that strengthens the delusional belief rather than abandoning it.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    In animal conditioning, pairings of a stimulus with a salient event teach the animal that the stimulus predicts the event; presenting the stimulus without the event produces extinction learning.

    “when an animal is exposed to pairings between an environmental stimulus (eg, a tone) and a salient event (eg, an electric shock), it learns that the tone predicts the shock.If the tone is then presented in the absence of shock, extinction learning occurs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] Eisenhardt, 2007, Extinction learning, reconsolidation and the internal reinforcement hypothesis, Neurobiol Learn Mem source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unlike cognitive neuropsychiatry, computational psychiatry formally specifies the processes and parameters by which they deviate from healthy processing, making it both qualitative and quantitative.

    “However, computational psychiatry includes a formal specification of the processes and the parametric means through which they deviate from healthy processing; in short, unlike cognitive neuropsychiatry, computational psychiatry is both qualitative (which parameters change?) and quantitative (by how much?). 1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Montague, 2012, Computational psychiatry, Trends Cogn Sci source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Computational psychiatry: a Rosetta Stone linking the brain to mental illness

    Within predictive coding, prediction error may lead to an updated belief or may be suppressed.

    “This characteristic can be considered within the predictive coding framework, where prediction error might lead to an updated belief or might be suppressed.22”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [22] Corlett, 2009, Why do delusions persist?, Front Hum Neurosci source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • Rests on an assumption: Delusions, though fixed and resistant to contradictory evidence, can expand to incorporate such evidence in a way that strengthens the delusional belief rather than abandoning it.
13 of 13
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Delusions, though fixed and resistant to contradictory evidence, can expand to incorporate such evidence in a way that strengthens the delusional belief rather than abandoning it.

    “One puzzling characteristic of delusions is that, although they are fixed and impervious to contradictory evidence, they can nevertheless show remarkable elasticity, expanding to incorporate contradictory evidence in such a way that the delusional belief is strengthened rather than relinquished.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The physical anatomy of the brain implements Bayesian mechanisms of top-down prediction of sensory inputs and bottom-up prediction errors.

    “The physical anatomy of the brain embodies Bayesian mechanisms of top-down prediction of sensory inputs and bottom-up prediction errors.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The separate but complementary findings from the ground-truth and computational analyses support the value of computational methods for understanding neurodevelopmental and psychiatric conditions and informing clinical practice.

    “The distinct but complementary results provided by the ground truth and computational levels of analysis in our study underwrite the utility of computational approaches in better understanding neuro-developmental and psychiatric conditions with the aim of influencing clinical practice 47–49.”

    From Adults with autism overestimate the volatility of the sensory environment (2017) · cites this paper as [48]

    The paper’s opening and concluding discussions (page numbers not provided) argue that computational psychiatry links levels of analysis, helps explain mental illness, and offers a path toward clinical use. It does not specifically address neurodevelopmental conditions. The ground-truth and computational results are identified as findings of the citing authors’ own study, not findings attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 105

Authors
Corlett, P. R., & Fletcher, P. C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Paul C
Venue
The Lancet Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-10
Volume
1
Issue
5
Pages
399-402
ISSN
2215-0366 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986402015
Cited by
105
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 4
FWCI
5.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (095692, 093875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
computational psychiatry, psychosis, cognitive modeling, reinforcement learning, neurochemistry, pharmacological interventions, cognitive intervention, social interaction, brain-behavior relationship, cognitive neuropsychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review