Cited by 405Air Quality and Health ImpactsAsthma and respiratory diseasesIndoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure

Association between air pollution and lung function growth in southern California children: results from a second cohort

Gauderman, W. James, Gilliland, G. Frank, Vora, Hita, Avol, Edward, Stram, Daniel, McConnell, Rob, Thomas, Duncan, Lurmann, Fred +4 more·2002·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

A cohort of 1,678 Southern California children, enrolled as fourth graders in 1996, was followed for 4 years to determine whether the growth in lung function of the children was associated with their exposure to ambient air pollutants. These subjects comprised the second cohort of fourth grade children participating in the Children's Health Study. Significant deficits in lung function growth rate were associated with exposure to acid vapor, NO(2), particles with aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 microm (PM(2.5)), and elemental carbon. For example, the average annual growth rates of maximal midexpiratory flow and forced expiratory volume in 1 second were reduced by approximately 11% (p = 0.005) and 5% (p = 0.03), respectively, across the observed range of acid exposure. Exposure to acid vapor was also associated with reductions in the ratio of maximal midexpiratory flow to forced vital capacity (p = 0.02), whereas exposure to ozone was correlated with reduced growth in peak flow rate (p = 0.006). Larger deficits in lung function growth rate were observed in children who reported spending more time outdoors. These findings provide important replication of our previous findings of an effect of air pollution on lung function growth that were based on the first fourth-grade cohort from the Children's Health Study (Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:1383-1390).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.2111021

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Long-term exposures to ozone have been associated with lower lung function and deteriorated or abnormal lung development in children.

    “Long-term exposures to ozone have been associated with lower lung function and deteriorated or abnormal lung development in children (31, 32).”

    From Ozone pollution: A Major health hazard worldwide (2019) · cites this paper as [32]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [3]3. Particulate air pollution and daily mortality: replication and validation of selected studies, 1995. Phase I report of the Particle Epidemiology Evaluation Project. Health Effects Institute, Cambridge, MA.
  2. [8]8. Wiley, J., J. Robinson, T. Piazza, L. Stork, and K. Pladsen. 1993. Final report-study of children's activity patterns.
  3. [31]31. Bates, D. 1995. Ozone: a review of recent experimental, clinical, and epidemiological evidence, with notes on causation-Part 1. Can. Respir. J. 2:25-31.
  4. [32]32. Bates, D. 1995. Ozone: a review of recent experimental, clinical, and epidemiological evidence, with notes on causation-Part 2. Can. Respir. J. 2:161-171.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gauderman, W. J., Gilliland, G. F., Vora, H., Avol, E., Stram, D., McConnell, R., Thomas, D., Lurmann, F., Margolis, H. G., Rappaport, E. B., Berhane, K., & Peters, J. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles; Sonoma Technology Inc., Petaluma; and California Environmental Protection Agency, Sacramento, California
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
166
Issue
1
Pages
76-84
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2804108711
Cited by
405
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 22
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Indoor Air Quality and Microbial Exposure
Keywords
air pollution, lung function growth, children, ambient air pollutants, nitrogen dioxide, PM2.5, elemental carbon, ozone, forced expiratory volume, Children's Health Study, outdoor time, replication
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, California, Child, Environmental Exposure, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Lung, Male, Residence Characteristics, Respiratory Mechanics, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review