Cited by 65Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and DisordersAutophagy in Disease and Therapy

Mitochondria-dependent phase separation of disease-relevant proteins drives pathological features of age-related macular degeneration

Open access
La Cunza, Nilsa, Tan, Li Xuan, Thamban, Thushara, Germer, Colin J., Rathnasamy, Gurugirijha, Toops, Kimberly A., Lakkaraju, Aparna·2021·JCI Insight

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) damages the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), the tissue that safeguards photoreceptor health, leading to irreversible vision loss. Polymorphisms in cholesterol and complement genes are implicated in AMD, yet mechanisms linking risk variants to RPE injury remain unclear. We sought to determine how allelic variants in the apolipoprotein E cholesterol transporter modulate RPE homeostasis and function. Using live-cell imaging, we show that inefficient cholesterol transport by the AMD risk-associated ApoE2 increases RPE ceramide, leading to autophagic defects and complement-mediated mitochondrial damage. Mitochondrial injury drives redox state–sensitive cysteine-mediated phase separation of ApoE2, forming biomolecular condensates that could nucleate drusen. The protective ApoE4 isoform lacks these cysteines and is resistant to phase separation and condensate formation. In Abca –/– Stargardt macular degeneration mice, mitochondrial dysfunction induces liquid-liquid phase separation of p62/SQSTM1, a multifunctional protein that regulates autophagy. Drugs that decrease RPE cholesterol or ceramide prevent mitochondrial injury and phase separation in vitro and in vivo. In AMD donor RPE, mitochondrial fragmentation correlates with ApoE and p62 condensates. Our studies demonstrate that major AMD genetic and biological risk pathways converge upon RPE mitochondria, and identify mitochondrial stress-mediated protein phase separation as an important pathogenic mechanism and promising therapeutic target in AMD.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci.insight.142254

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reduced internalization ability of lipApoE2 may protect it against its potentially deleterious structural property.

    “its reduced internalization ability may protect it against this potentially deleterious structural property”

    From Decreased lipidated ApoE‐receptor interactions confer protection against pathogenicity of ApoE and its lipid cargoes in lysosomes (2025) · cites this paper as [73]

    The Results section on ApoE trafficking reports that ApoE2 has structural differences associated with impaired intracellular trafficking and cholesterol transport. It does not establish that lipidated ApoE2 has reduced internalization or that reduced internalization protects against those structural effects; intracellular trafficking is not the same as internalization. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
La Cunza, N., Tan, L. X., Thamban, T., Germer, C. J., Rathnasamy, G., Toops, K. A., & Lakkaraju, A.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, and
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Lakkaraju, Aparna
Venue
JCI Insight
Published
2021-05-10
Volume
6
Issue
9
ISSN
2379-3708 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3142189813
Cited by
65
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCI Insight (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY023299, R01EY030668, Diversity Supplement Fellowship, P30EY016665, P30EY002162)
  • Research to Prevent Blindness/American Macular Degeneration Foundation (Catalyst Award for Innovative Research Approaches to AMD)
  • BrightFocus Foundation (M2015350)
  • Macular Society UK (AMD research grant)
  • Retina Research Foundation (Rebecca Meyer Brown Professorship)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, retinal pigment epithelium, apolipoprotein E, APOE2, APOE ε4, cholesterol transport, ceramide, autophagy, complement system, mitochondrial damage, liquid-liquid phase separation, biomolecular condensates, p62, drusen, mitochondrial fragmentation, genetic risk variants
MeSH terms
Intravital Microscopy, Sequestosome-1 Protein, Biomolecular Condensates, Animals, Autophagy, Ceramides, Cholesterol, Complement System Proteins, Macular Degeneration, Mitochondria, Mice, Knockout, Oxidative Stress, Mice, Apolipoprotein E4, Apolipoprotein E2, Retinal Pigment Epithelium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review