Cited by 501Coffee research and impactsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tolerance to the humoral and hemodynamic effects of caffeine in man.

Open access
Robertson, D, Wade, D, Workman, R, Woosley, R L, Oates, J A·1981·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Acute caffeine in subjects who do not normally ingest methylxanthines leads to increases in blood pressure, heart rate, plasma epinephrine, plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, and urinary catecholamines. Using a double-blind design, the effects of chronic caffeine administration on these same variables were assessed. Near complete tolerance, in terms of both humoral and hemodynamic variables, developed over the first 1-4 d of caffeine. No long-term effects of caffeine on blood pressure, heart rate, plasma renin activity, plasma catecholamines, or urinary catecholamines could be demonstrated. Discontinuation of caffeine ingestion after 7 d of administration did not result in a detectable withdrawal phenomenon relating to any of the variables assessed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci110124

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 35 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 500

Metadata

Authors
Robertson, D., Wade, D., Workman, R., Woosley, R. L., & Oates, J. A.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
1981-04-01
Volume
67
Issue
4
Pages
1111-1117
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1970693682
Cited by
501
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
caffeine, tolerance (pharmacology and immunology), blood pressure, heart rate, plasma epinephrine, plasma norepinephrine, plasma renin activity, urinary catecholamines, methylxanthines, caffeine withdrawal, hemodynamic effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Caffeine, Catecholamines, Double-Blind Method, Drug Tolerance, Female, Hemodynamics, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Renin

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review