Cited by 202Gut microbiota and healthGastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel Disease

A Clostridia-rich microbiota enhances bile acid excretion in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome

Open access
Zhao, Ling, Yang, Wei, Chen, Yang, Huang, Fengjie, Lu, Lin, Lin, Chengyuan, Huang, Tao, Ning, Ziwan +20 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective An excess of fecal bile acids (BAs) is thought to be one of the mechanisms for diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D). However, the factors causing excessive BA excretion remains unclear. Given the importance of gut microbiota in BA metabolism, we hypothesized that gut dysbiosis might contribute to excessive BA excretion in IBS-D. Design Metabolomic and metagenomic analyses were performed of specimens from 290 IBS-D patients and 89 healthy volunteers. By transplanting human microbiota and manipulating specific microbiome species in mice, the effects of microbiota on host BA metabolism were assessed at metabolic, genetic and protein levels. Effects of individual and mixed BAs on enterohepatic feedback pathways were also tested in vitro and in vivo . Results Total fecal BAs were excessively excreted in 24.5% of IBS-D patients. Their fecal metagenomes showed increased abundances of Clostridia and BA-transforming genes ( hdhA and bais ). The increases of Clostridia bacteria (e.g. C. scindens ) were positively associated with the levels of fecal BAs and serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4), while being negatively correlated with serum fibroblast growth factor 19 (FGF19). Both Clostridia -rich human microbiota and C. scindens enhanced levels of serum C4 and hepatic conjugated BAs in mice recipients and reduced ileal FGF19 expression. Inhibition of Clostridium species by vancomycin yielded opposite findings. Clostridia -derived BAs (e.g. conjugated and free ursodeoxycholic acid) significantly suppressed intestinal FGF19 expression. Conclusion The Clostridia -rich microbiota contributes to excessive BA excretion in IBS-D patients. This study provided the basis for more precise clinical diagnosis and management for IBS-D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci130976

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In PI-IBS neuronal signalling remained sensitised 2 years after the infection.

    “For example, in PI-IBS neuronal signalling remained sensitised 2 years after the infection. 53”

    From Irritable bowel syndrome (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Introduction discusses bile acids and visceral hypersensitivity in IBS-D, while the Results examine bile-acid excretion; neither addresses neuronal signalling in post-infectious IBS. Searches for PI-IBS, neuronal sensitisation, and a two-year period after infection found no supporting passage in our copy. Page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 62

  1. [1]Enck P et al Irritable bowel syndrome Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016 2 16014 27159638 PMC5001845
  2. [2]Liu L Xiao QF Zhang YL Yao SK A cross-sectional study of irritable bowel syndrome in nurses in China: prevalence and associated psychological and lifestyle factors J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 2014 15 6 590 597 10.1631/jzus.B1300159 24903997 PMC4116852 · DOI
  3. [3]Kwan AC Hu WH Chan YK Yeung YW Lai TS Yuen H Prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome in Hong Kong J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002 17 11 1180 1186 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2002.02871.x 12453277 · DOI
  4. [4]Endo Y Shoji T Fukudo S Epidemiology of irritable bowel syndrome Ann Gastroenterol 2015 28 2 158 159 25830818 PMC4367204
  5. [5]Lacy BE Weiser K De Lee R The treatment of irritable bowel syndrome Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2009 2 4 221 238 10.1177/1756283X09104794 21180545 PMC3002524 · DOI
  6. [7]Jailwala J Imperiale TF Kroenke K Pharmacologic treatment of the irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review of randomized, controlled trials Ann Intern Med 2000 133 2 136 147 10.7326/0003-4819-133-2-200007180-00013 10896640 · DOI
  7. [8]Camilleri M Bile acid diarrhea: prevalence, pathogenesis, and therapy Gut Liver 2015 9 3 332 339 25918262 PMC4413966
  8. [10]Peleman C Camilleri M Busciglio I Burton D Donato L Zinsmeister AR Colonic transit and bile acid synthesis or excretion in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-diarrhea without bile acid malabsorption Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017 15 5 720 727.e1 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.11.012 27856362 PMC5401790 · DOI
  9. [11]Camilleri M Carlson P Acosta A Busciglio I Colonic mucosal gene expression and genotype in irritable bowel syndrome patients with normal or elevated fecal bile acid excretion Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2015 309 1 G10 G20 10.1152/ajpgi.00080.2015 25930081 PMC4491506 · DOI
  10. [12]Wong BS et al Increased bile acid biosynthesis is associated with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012 10 9 1009 1015.e3 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.05.006 22610000 PMC3565429 · DOI
  11. [13]Camilleri M Advances in understanding of bile acid diarrhea Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 8 1 49 61 10.1586/17474124.2014.851599 24410472 PMC4211077 · DOI
  12. [14]Fromm H Malavolti M Bile acid-induced diarrhoea Clin Gastroenterol 1986 15 3 567 582 3742841
  13. [15]Dior M et al Interplay between bile acid metabolism and microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome Neurogastroenterol Motil 2016 28 9 1330 1340 10.1111/nmo.12829 27060367 · DOI
  14. [16]Bajor A Törnblom H Rudling M Ung KA Simrén M Increased colonic bile acid exposure: a relevant factor for symptoms and treatment in IBS Gut 2015 64 1 84 92 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-305965 24727487 · DOI
  15. [17]Kim NH Park JH Park JS Joung YH The effect of deoxycholic acid on secretion and motility in the rat and guinea pig large intestine J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2017 23 4 606 615 10.5056/jnm16201 28554984 PMC5628994 · DOI
  16. [18]Traub RJ Tang B Ji Y Pandya S Yfantis H Sun Y A rat model of chronic postinflammatory visceral pain induced by deoxycholic acid Gastroenterology 2008 135 6 2075 2083 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.051 19000677 PMC2782449 · DOI
  17. [19]Odunsi-Shiyanbade ST et al Effects of chenodeoxycholate and a bile acid sequestrant, colesevelam, on intestinal transit and bowel function Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 8 2 159 165 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.10.020 19879973 PMC2822105 · DOI
  18. [20]Barkun AN Love J Gould M Pluta H Steinhart H Bile acid malabsorption in chronic diarrhea: pathophysiology and treatment Can J Gastroenterol 2013 27 11 653 659 10.1155/2013/485631 24199211 PMC3816948 · DOI
  19. [22]Wahlström A Sayin SI Marschall HU Bäckhed F Intestinal crosstalk between bile acids and microbiota and its impact on host metabolism Cell Metab 2016 24 1 41 50 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.05.005 27320064 · DOI
  20. [23]Chiang JY Bile acid metabolism and signaling Compr Physiol 2013 3 3 1191 1212 23897684 PMC4422175
  21. [24]Gälman C Arvidsson I Angelin B Rudling M Monitoring hepatic cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase activity by assay of the stable bile acid intermediate 7alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one in peripheral blood J Lipid Res 2003 44 4 859 866 10.1194/jlr.D200043-JLR200 12562858 · DOI
  22. [25]Sayin SI et al Gut microbiota regulates bile acid metabolism by reducing the levels of tauro-beta-muricholic acid, a naturally occurring FXR antagonist Cell Metab 2013 17 2 225 235 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.01.003 23395169 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [26]Walters JR Tasleem AM Omer OS Brydon WG Dew T le Roux CW A new mechanism for bile acid diarrhea: defective feedback inhibition of bile acid biosynthesis Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 11 1189 1194 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.04.024 19426836 · DOI
  24. [27]Camilleri M et al Measurement of serum 7alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (or 7alphaC4), a surrogate test for bile acid malabsorption in health, ileal disease and irritable bowel syndrome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry Neurogastroenterol Motil 2009 21 7 734 e43 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2009.01288.x 19368662 PMC2705747 · DOI · Paper page
  25. [28]Johnston IM et al Characterizing factors associated with differences in FGF19 blood levels and synthesis in patients with primary bile acid diarrhea Am J Gastroenterol 2016 111 3 423 432 10.1038/ajg.2015.424 26856750 · DOI
  26. [29]Sadik R Abrahamsson H Ung KA Stotzer PO Accelerated regional bowel transit and overweight shown in idiopathic bile acid malabsorption Am J Gastroenterol 2004 99 4 711 718 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.04139.x 15089906 · DOI
  27. [30]Wong BS et al A Klothoβ variant mediates protein stability and associates with colon transit in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhea Gastroenterology 2011 140 7 1934 1942 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.02.063 21396369 PMC3109206 · DOI
  28. [31]Camilleri M et al Genetic variation in GPBAR1 predisposes to quantitative changes in colonic transit and bile acid excretion Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2014 307 5 G508 G516 10.1152/ajpgi.00178.2014 25012842 PMC4154122 · DOI
  29. [32]Collins SM A role for the gut microbiota in IBS Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 11 8 497 505 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.40 24751910 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [33]Pittayanon R et al Gut microbiota in patients with irritable bowel syndrome-a systematic review Gastroenterology 2019 157 1 97 108 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.049 30940523 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [34]Mearin F et al Bowel disorders Gastroenterology 2016 150 6 1393 1407.e5 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.031 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [36]Ridlon JM Kang DJ Hylemon PB Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria J Lipid Res 2006 47 2 241 259 10.1194/jlr.R500013-JLR200 16299351 · DOI · Paper page
  33. [37]Rizzo G Renga B Mencarelli A Pellicciari R Fiorucci S Role of FXR in regulating bile acid homeostasis and relevance for human diseases Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocr Metabol Disord 2005 5 3 289 303 10.2174/1568008054863781 16178789 · DOI
  34. [38]Lew JL et al The farnesoid X receptor controls gene expression in a ligand- and promoter-selective fashion J Biol Chem 2004 279 10 8856 8861 10.1074/jbc.M306422200 14684751 · DOI
  35. [39]Bajor A Gillberg PG Abrahamsson H Bile acids: short and long term effects in the intestine Scand J Gastroenterol 2010 45 6 645 664 10.3109/00365521003702734 20334475 · DOI
  36. [40]Colecchia A et al Ursodeoxycholic acid improves gastrointestinal motility defects in gallstone patients World J Gastroenterol 2006 12 33 5336 5343 10.3748/wjg.v12.i33.5336 16981264 PMC4088201 · DOI
  37. [42]Valentin N et al Potential mechanisms of effects of serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin/protein isolate therapy in patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome Physiol Rep 2017 5 5 e13170 10.14814/phy2.13170 28275113 PMC5350178 · DOI
  38. [43]Hofmann AF Mangelsdorf DJ Kliewer SA Chronic diarrhea due to excessive bile acid synthesis and not defective ileal transport: a new syndrome of defective fibroblast growth factor 19 release Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 11 1151 1154 10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.026 19665580 PMC2850200 · DOI
  39. [44]Walters JR Bile acid diarrhoea and FGF19: new views on diagnosis, pathogenesis and therapy Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014 11 7 426 434 10.1038/nrgastro.2014.32 24662279 · DOI
  40. [45]van Tilburg AJ de Rooij FW van den Berg JW van Blankenstein M Primary bile acid diarrhoea without an ileal carrier defect: quantification of active bile acid transport across the ileal brush border membrane Gut 1991 32 5 500 503 10.1136/gut.32.5.500 2040472 PMC1378925 · DOI
  41. [46]Bajor A et al Normal or increased bile acid uptake in isolated mucosa from patients with bile acid malabsorption Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 18 4 397 403 10.1097/00042737-200604000-00013 16538111 · DOI
  42. [47]Dawson PA Karpen SJ Intestinal transport and metabolism of bile acids J Lipid Res 2015 56 6 1085 1099 10.1194/jlr.R054114 25210150 PMC4442867 · DOI · Paper page
  43. [49]Marion S et al In vitro and in vivo characterization of Clostridium scindens bile acid transformations Gut Microbes 2019 10 4 481 503 10.1080/19490976.2018.1549420 30589376 PMC6748637 · DOI
  44. [51]Mueller M et al Ursodeoxycholic acid exerts farnesoid X receptor-antagonistic effects on bile acid and lipid metabolism in morbid obesity J Hepatol 2015 62 6 1398 1404 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.12.034 25617503 PMC4451470 · DOI
  45. [52]Sun L et al Gut microbiota and intestinal FXR mediate the clinical benefits of metformin Nat Med 2018 24 12 1919 1929 10.1038/s41591-018-0222-4 30397356 PMC6479226 · DOI · Paper page
  46. [54]Zhang JH et al Potent stimulation of fibroblast growth factor 19 expression in the human ileum by bile acids Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2013 304 10 G940 G948 10.1152/ajpgi.00398.2012 23518683 PMC3652069 · DOI
  47. [55]Zhang Y LaCerte C Kansra S Jackson JP Brouwer KR Edwards JE Comparative potency of obeticholic acid and natural bile acids on FXR in hepatic and intestinal in vitro cell models Pharmacol Res Perspect 2017 5 6 e00368 29226620 PMC5723701
  48. [56]Ipharraguerre IR Pastor JJ Gavaldà-Navarro A Villarroya F Mereu A Antimicrobial promotion of pig growth is associated with tissue-specific remodeling of bile acid signature and signaling Sci Rep 2018 8 1 13671 10.1038/s41598-018-32107-9 30209339 PMC6135865 · DOI
  49. [58]Vijayvargiya P Camilleri M Shin A Saenger A Methods for diagnosis of bile acid malabsorption in clinical practice Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013 11 10 1232 1239 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.04.029 23644387 PMC3783593 · DOI
  50. [59]Vijayvargiya P et al Analysis of fecal primary bile acids detects increased stool weight and colonic transit in patients with chronic functional diarrhea Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019 17 5 922 929.e2 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.050 29902647 PMC6291372 · DOI
  51. [61]Tap J et al Identification of an intestinal microbiota signature associated with severity of irritable bowel syndrome Gastroenterology 2017 152 1 111 123.e8 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.09.049 27725146 · DOI · Paper page
  52. [62]Shin A Preidis GA Shulman R Kashyap PC The gut microbiome in adult and pediatric functional gastrointestinal disorders Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019 17 2 256 274 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.08.054 30153517 PMC6314902 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [63]Zoetendal EG et al Isolation of DNA from bacterial samples of the human gastrointestinal tract Nat Protoc 2006 1 2 870 873 10.1038/nprot.2006.142 17406319 · DOI
  54. [64]Li J et al An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome Nat Biotechnol 2014 32 8 834 841 10.1038/nbt.2942 24997786 · DOI · Paper page
  55. [65]Liu R et al Gut microbiome and serum metabolome alterations in obesity and after weight-loss intervention Nat Med 2017 23 7 859 868 10.1038/nm.4358 28628112 · DOI · Paper page
  56. [67]Lin CY et al Spexin acts as novel regulator for bile acid synthesis Front Physiol 2018 9 378 29692737 PMC5902714
  57. [68]García-Cañaveras JC Donato MT Castell JV Lahoz A Targeted profiling of circulating and hepatic bile acids in human, mouse, and rat using a UPLC-MRM-MS-validated method J Lipid Res 2012 53 10 2231 2241 10.1194/jlr.D028803 22822028 PMC3435556 · DOI
  58. [69]Parséus A et al Microbiota-induced obesity requires farnesoid X receptor Gut 2017 66 3 429 437 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310283 26740296 PMC5534765 · DOI
  59. [70]Xie G et al Profiling of serum bile acids in a healthy Chinese population using UPLC-MS/MS J Proteome Res 2015 14 2 850 859 10.1021/pr500920q 25581415 · DOI
  60. [71]Yano JM et al Indigenous bacteria from the gut microbiota regulate host serotonin biosynthesis Cell 2015 161 2 264 276 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.047 25860609 PMC4393509 · DOI · Paper page
  61. [72]Zhao L et al Saturated long-chain fatty acid-producing bacteria contribute to enhanced colonic motility in rats Microbiome 2018 6 1 107 10.1186/s40168-018-0492-6 29903041 PMC6003035 · DOI
  62. [73]Zhang Y Limaye PB Renaud HJ Klaassen CD Effect of various antibiotics on modulation of intestinal microbiota and bile acid profile in mice Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2014 277 2 138 145 10.1016/j.taap.2014.03.009 24657338 PMC5533088 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhao, L., Yang, W., Chen, Y., Huang, F., Lu, L., Lin, C., Huang, T., Ning, Z., Zhai, L., Zhong, L. L. D., Lam, W., Yang, Z., Zhang, X., Cheng, C., Han, L., Qiu, Q., Shang, X., Huang, R., Xiao, H., Ren, Z., Chen, D., Sun, S., El-Nezami, H., Cai, Z., Lu, A., Fang, X., Jia, W., & Bian, Z.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Baptist University (HK)
  • Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
  • BGI Genomics (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
  • Fang, Xiaodong
  • Jia, Wei
  • Bian, Zhaoxiang
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2019-12-09
Volume
130
Issue
1
Pages
438-450
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2993103758
Cited by
202
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • the Innovation and Technology Fund, HKSAR (ITS-148-14FP)
  • Guangdong-Hong Kong Technology Cooperation Funding Scheme (2016A050503039)
  • Guangzhou Science and Technology Program Key Projects (201604020005)
  • Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Grant (JCYJ20160331190123578, JCYJ20170413170320959)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome, bile acids, Clostridia, Clostridium scindens, gut dysbiosis, bile acid metabolism, 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, FGF19, bile acid conjugates, vancomycin, fecal microbiota transplantation, gut microbiota
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Bile Acids and Salts, Clostridium, Diarrhea, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Irritable Bowel Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review